Should Facebook Take Down Aurora Shooter's Fanpages?
SodaHead News
2012/07/28 20:30:27
|
|
|||||
|
674 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
321 votes
|
|
32% | |||
The name James Holmes will forever live in infamy after the accused criminal murdered 12 people with gunfire and wounded many more during a midnight screening of "The Dark Night Rises" in a theater in Aurora, Colorado. Based on various reports following the shootings, it seems as though Holmes planned to become a real life comic book villain. As for other details, those are still scarce and getting inside a psychotic, cold-blooded man's head will be tough for prosecutors.
But getting rid of tasteless content in support of the Colorado shooter; that should be easy for Facebook, right? Not according to a report by CNN.com, which states that there are multiple fanpages for the killer, including one with more than 800 followers [or "likes"]. Facebook isn't like YouTube or message boards, where one can be anonymous. So unless they're using fake aliases and lack profile pictures, Holmes supporters are making themselves known publicly on the fanpage. Maybe they're Internet trolls. They could even be people with the same mental state as Holmes.
Regardless, Facebook won't remove the pages. Company spokesman Fred Wolens explained that the most popular Holmes fanpage "while incredibly distasteful, doesn't violate our terms." In order to be removed, it would have to post credible threats against specific people or intend to incite violence. We agree that free speech should be protected. But this lenient policy seems pretty inconsistent with the numerous stories we've heard over the years of everyday people having photos/content flagged and taken down, at times unfairly.
What do you think SodaHeads? Should Facebook remove the Colorado shooter's fanpages?


Read More: http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/25/tech/social-media/fa...
Top Opinion
-
thomas.fox.54 2012/07/28 21:24:17No+221st amendment. these people are sick, disgusting animals but they have the right to the 1st amendment. i hate censored websites anyway. people need to realize that they share a country with these people and they need to deal with it not pretend that these sick people dont exist






















If you are blocked, you are not allowed to post at all on any of the question pages that person puts up. You are not allowed to reply to that person's posts. You might not even say anything to that person, but they just don't like your tone, or whatever, & they block you.
There are a lot of big-talking pussies on SodaHead who love to act like middle school hall monitors. They feel high & mighty & powerful with their mouse clicking finger... likely the same one they use to dig the boogers out from way deep in the back of their noses.
Just know that speech on SodaHead's a hell of a long way from being free.
There's nothing wrong with cussing, in my opinion. It's part of life. Everyone has his/her own way.
If I offend someone, that's their problem. Life does not guarantee one not be offended... & sometimes the best way to get one's point across is by cussing.
You know what offends me? Bad grammar & spelling. ...shows laziness & ignorance... especially since we have spell check when using computers.
You do as you like. I do as I like. Prove yourself through your opinions & beliefs & how you handle attacks from people who oppose you. Don't worry too much about the rest.
OK I get the Church and State thing, but there is no denying that these were basic laws that Statutes and Legal Codes are modeled after.
If nothing else they should be historically included as one of the first recorded group of laws.
Instead we get people making fun of victims and supporting a chump killer who would have probably wet himself if someone shot back.
Way to go Facebook.
True,there is a certain demographic who will display idolatry,which is irresponsible,but this bumps into 1st amendment issues.Remember,1st amendment was designed to protect offensive speech,as any other pesuasion,
just saying
i cant believe this
Of course, I agree 100% with your principle, however.
http://www.facebook.com/pages...
It's got only 142 likes. Too bad he didn't get only 142 votes.
...& if you want to out yourself as a fan of a psycho, then I encourage you full-heartedly.
...it's a hell of a lot easier to protect one's self from psychos when they identify themselves publicly as being psychos.
I mean, sites like this exist, right?
I agree that it is parents' & families' responsibility to teach children. But I also believe it takes a village.
Moreover, I would argue that in life, there are good good examples & good bad examples. A good teacher is able to teach using the good bad examples as well as the good good examples.
But it would seem that we're already going down the sewer. Look who our two main candidates are to run our nation... both liars, both bad for our nation & the world. Both have no credible character... I wouldn't leave either of them alone with my kids. We know every single time our government does something in our name that is wrong, yet we allow them to get away with it & continue. Our society is already spinning down the toilet bowl. We point guns at each other simply because we disagree. We call each other vile, filthy names & think it's funny & okay. We allow our children to watch TV shows & play video games filled with vulgarity & extreme violence, yet shield their eyes when there is the slightest threat of nudity. Our priorities are completely upside-down.
So, though I agree with you, it seems to me that the last bit of good in our society is threatened... not by fans of the latest whacko, but by our apathy & lack of common sense as a people.
I've seen you around on here for the last year & I always pay attention to your posts as well. I find your posts generally quite sound, logical & well thought out. We tend to agree on many things.
Thanks again for your kind words. It's always a pleasure to read what you have to say, but today was especially gratifying. You made my day.
All the best,
~Grammar~