Should Eric Holder be allowed to conduct the investigation into the White House security leaks?
Walt
2012/06/09 04:12:17
|
|
|||||
|
11 votes
|
|
7% | ||
|
116 votes
|
|
76% | ||
|
25 votes
|
|
16% | ||
Holder Appoints Two Prosecutors to Probe Security Leaks:
http://www.newsmax.com/Advertise/Holder-prosecutors-security-...
Do you think Eric Holder should be the person in charge of those who will be investigating the security leaks coming from the White House?
http://www.newsmax.com/Advertise/Holder-prosecutors-security-...
Do you think Eric Holder should be the person in charge of those who will be investigating the security leaks coming from the White House?
Top Opinion
-
themadhare ~IJM 2012/06/09 04:18:25
The top executive in charge of justice in the United States.
Embarrassing!
Aside from Obama, I choose Geithner the Tax Cheat Head of IRS as the most embarrassing.
Certainly counts, just not one of Obama's picks really.
I was also incorrect about Geithner being one of Bush 43's people, he was part of the later half of Clinton's second term, although he was always involved with the Fed in some way. He also probably would have been Secretary of the Treasury under a McCain presidency.
There are a lot of connections between many of these powerful people, which considering the nazi like attitude toward nepotism on regular people's levels with government or business, it is a double standard to say the least with the preference for Ivy Leaguers. Some of the poorest ideas seem to come from our "best and brightest," that is for sure. Bill Buckley said he would rather have the first 100 people in the local phone book running the country than the faculty of Harvard.
What troubles me most about this particular guy is his incompetence to file his federal taxes correctly, and what his position is in the federal government. Imagine the head of some parking authority in some town or city having not paid for his parking pass for four years, that would cost a regular guy his job.
The more one learns about the corrupt machine the more of Earth it covers. If we'd had desktop computers 20 or 30 years before the early 80s would they have come this far? The more I learn the more invasive NWO is.
Was it Woody Allen who said blow up DC and replace government with the first 3000 names from the NYC phone book? Of course I'd have chosen a significantly more conservative state, but you knew that already.
The NWO types like the Rockefellers, and the endless examples of Ivy League graduates have never really done much good. FDR's brain trust was over in Russia fawning over Stalin's government before WW II started, and it has all been down hill from there it seems.
I am not so worried about the NWO types if people in this country would wake up and embrace their freedom, then it would not be so much of an issue. Hell, the NWO types have so f****d up the EU, I think if we can get Obama out, an undo all of his policy, we could stay out of the entanglement that is a centrally controlled world government body. I know there are plenty of threats, but if people start embracing their God given rights, and Constitutional guaranteed rights, it would be one Hell of a struggle to drag us into a NWO clusterf**k.
USA is the crowning achievement in the NWO takeover and they are determined not to lose.
Hillary is not president because the Clintons refused to destroy the economy and they were punished severely for that, proving that those who would rule Earth will stop at nothing at this point.
Already we see citizens rebelling against this but the crooks we're dealing still have plenty of nastiness up their sleeves because they've practiced on every other country first. Our lives mean nothing to them (UN Agenda 21 and 1974's CLUB OF ROME
Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy).
Your well-turned thoughts are soothing. Sorry to say I doubt it'll turn out that way.
LOL
That my friend is a instant classic!
The problems with the UN Agenda 21 and 1974's CLUB OF ROME
Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy is that they are aimed at countries that are already below birth rate replacement levels, and 21 in particular with its gun grabbing agenda is not going to fly in the United States. Long story short, if they population control people were serious about it, they would be doing something in South America, and Asia, and they are not going to confiscate the guns of Americans without all Hell breaking lose. I agree the plan is there, but like all other left wing nonsense, it will not work, it will just result in death and destruction. I know I will fight these dirtbags to my last breath, an I suspect you and plenty of other people will do the same.
You're only looking at the rotten apples in the top of the barrel. They started in Africa, South American and everywhere else before we were born.
What I am saying is, there are enough freedom loving Americans to make a difference on what happens here. That is my hope, and my belief.
If they wanted to they could do anything and call it terrorism. No matter how many guns citizens buy it's hard to defend against surprise attacks.
What I wish for is what you say. I am playing devil's advocate here because others as convincing as you are plenty pessimistic and I have read enough to find them credible.
And how do inner-cities that would have unrest vote?
Once again, the left would shoot itself in the foot.
That is what they do.
Think the good citizens of Mayberry are going to hand over their firearms? Think Peoria is going to welcome blue helmeted U.N. "peace keeping" forces? Think outside of inner-city Cincinnati, the rest of Hamilton County, Ohio (which is very Republican) people are going to bow down to a police state? I think the "unenlightened" folks of Pennsylvania (those who do not live in Philthyelphia or Pittsburgh will keep clinging to their guns and religion and reject the overlords. I think that the populations of Chicago, NYC and L.A. might go for it, maybe, but the vast majority of counties all over the United States are not going to stand for it for a second.
Is there a plan like you are suggesting? Would not surprise me one bit. The problem is with the details. Look at Obama's green energy plan; invest tons of money into green energy, and it gives green energy a start, and then lots of jobs are created in that sector. It did not work, the economy did not rise, the money went down a hole to never be seen again, and the green energy companies are filing for bankruptcy and going out of business.
I will leave you w...
And how do inner-cities that would have unrest vote?
Once again, the left would shoot itself in the foot.
That is what they do.
Think the good citizens of Mayberry are going to hand over their firearms? Think Peoria is going to welcome blue helmeted U.N. "peace keeping" forces? Think outside of inner-city Cincinnati, the rest of Hamilton County, Ohio (which is very Republican) people are going to bow down to a police state? I think the "unenlightened" folks of Pennsylvania (those who do not live in Philthyelphia or Pittsburgh will keep clinging to their guns and religion and reject the overlords. I think that the populations of Chicago, NYC and L.A. might go for it, maybe, but the vast majority of counties all over the United States are not going to stand for it for a second.
Is there a plan like you are suggesting? Would not surprise me one bit. The problem is with the details. Look at Obama's green energy plan; invest tons of money into green energy, and it gives green energy a start, and then lots of jobs are created in that sector. It did not work, the economy did not rise, the money went down a hole to never be seen again, and the green energy companies are filing for bankruptcy and going out of business.
I will leave you with something the Japanese knew, that our left-wing wanna be overlords do not seem to grasp.
There have always been people trying to conquer other people. Ideas have fomented, conquering concepts recorded and accumulated across millenia.
Rothschild famously started this crap in the 17th century and continue to this day in world finance. For example Libya was one of very few Rothschild-independent banks on earth. Now it's not.
That is one group. You know about Bilderberg Group, Roman clubs, WTA, UN, George Soros, Maurice Strong, Adbusters,etc. They and way too many others to mention have conspired for decades.
When you want to rule Earth, you take on the easiest ones first. They've experimented and learned control techniques all over the globe (example: Mengele lives in spirit).
US is the crowning achievement and they are loaded for bear. If they think we have sufficient fire power to shoot back they'll just drop a bunker buster, poison the water, burn the county. They can do anything they want.
Stay alert.
We will beat these people, and they will scurry off to their caves, lick their wounds, and regroup, and plan.
The left will always implode by virtue of their own moral corruption. Always. But that does not mean we do not have to fight, we always will. It is those who uphold personally liberty who will always prevail in the end.
Nobody with a functioning brain could believe Holder could conduct an investigation.
A dog and pony show still must have dogs and ponies.
that was meant sarcastic .. !
SOON.