Should Courts Scrap the Affordable Health Care Act?
SodaHead News
2012/03/28 19:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
192 votes
|
|
18% | |||
|
130 votes
|
|
13% | |||
|
717 votes
|
|
69% | |||
For the last two days, the Supreme Court has been poring over the 2010 Affordable Health Care Act to determine whether or not the individual mandate, which would require U.S. citizens to purchase health care, should stand. Going into the debate, supporters had high hopes. Now it seems unlikely the mandate will survive. At this point, the judges need to find a "limiting principle," or clear limit to Congress's power in requiring Americans to to have health insurance, or it might fall flat.
However, some believe striking the entire bill dead would do more harm than good. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, "There are so many things in the act. Why make Congress redo that? Why should we stop and start from scratch?" Of course, there's the issue of who will go through the 2,700-page bill and decide which provisions can stay, and Rep. Michele Bachmann warns, "The individual mandate would be the funding stream that makes all of the rest of the act work." Do you think the courts should scrap the individual mandate and try to make it work, kill the entire thing and start from scratch, or just let it stand? You can read more information on this complex act here.

However, some believe striking the entire bill dead would do more harm than good. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, "There are so many things in the act. Why make Congress redo that? Why should we stop and start from scratch?" Of course, there's the issue of who will go through the 2,700-page bill and decide which provisions can stay, and Rep. Michele Bachmann warns, "The individual mandate would be the funding stream that makes all of the rest of the act work." Do you think the courts should scrap the individual mandate and try to make it work, kill the entire thing and start from scratch, or just let it stand? You can read more information on this complex act here.

Top Opinion
-
Kill it+41Get the government out of healthcare all together. I don't want anyone between me and my doctor! This unconstitutional law - if upheld - will be the end of freedom as we know it. We have been on this slippery slope for 50 years or more and are about to go over the cliff. It will not be healthcare or affordable. What a misuse of those two words.





















There are only a few things that will reduce costs -- 1) increase competition, 2) reduce regulations, 3) Tort reform and 4) change the thought that "INSURANCE" is anything other than for catastrophic illness...it is NOT for everyday ailments or problems like a broken leg.
People act like if they have insurance they personally do not pay. Insurance is not for going to the doctor if you have the flu, or cut your arm or have poison ivy. What is wrong with going to the doctors -- not filling out spending an hour filling out 3 pages of insurance paperwork? Why do I have to be subject to the BS when I go to the doctors to get a prescription for poison oak? Why would I need a f******* blood test or MRI?
Essentially people that have insurance abuse it and go to the doctors for every little damn thing there is for no reason simply because the insured doesn't think they pay for the doctors visit. THERE IS NOTHING THAT IS FREE. AND GOVERNMENT CAN ONLY TAKE YOUR MONEY FROM YOU IN ORDER TO GIVE IT BACK TO YOU AND THEN PROCLAIM IT TO BE A "BENEFIT".
The government uses other people's money and resources.
That, and Jesus tended to be selfless while government tends to be selfish. Its best not to trust government with "charity" for that reason.
Think he also said not to work on the Sabbath ( to include cooking), but almost none hold that commandment lol.
Just saying.
Insurance companies need reeled in, too, on their overpriced premiums and the drug companies need to quit robbing folks, too. There are many avenues that we could start with to help out those with no care.
Insurance companies and Drug companies are capitalist they are not in the business of helping people they are in the business in making money.
Right again on insurance and drug companies-and I am for capitalism all the way, but there is no use in robbing people who need healthcare or meds at times.
http://www.realclearpolitics....
Don't be so naive and use your head.