Should Churches lose their tax exempt status......

by Brandon Posted 2012/06/02 14:33:41

Related Topics: homosexual, Pastor, Dollar, status, Tax, News, Political

12 votes
Read all 22 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes, they should have it....	2 votes	17%
	No, they should not have it...	5 votes	42%
	Other...	5 votes	42%

With all the latest news coming out across the country of Pastors at Churches bidding for the death of homosexuals, using their multi-million dollar mega Churches as political forums....what say you??

Add a comment above

voice_matters 2012/06/02 22:51:00

No, they should not have it...

way to go libby. at least he will get the pollling data he wants. he asks a quesion but his answers are no means yes and yes means no.

reply
Brandon to voice_m... 2012/06/03 14:51:16

I'm not looking for polling data lol. It's pretty simple.

Yes, they should keep there tax exempt status

No, they should not keep there tax exempt status.

This comes from an argument that I have witnessed on the internet as well as have had with friends. Was just looking for opinions, since this is an opinion website. Quit over thinking things.

reply
voice_m... to Brandon 2012/06/03 17:55:03

you question is should churches lose their tax excempt status. if you answer yes then they keep it and if you vote no they lose it

in order to give your correct answer that you want you need to overthink it or you are voting yes when you mean no..

reply
Brandon to voice_m... 2012/06/03 23:32:33

That would be correct if the awnsers were simply yes and no. Then I would agree with your point. However I clearly defined what yes meant as well as what no meant. I understand if you think I was skewing poll results, but I'm just a 25 year old Alabama retail worker lol.

reply
voice_m... to Brandon 2012/06/04 15:19:20

you question is should churches lose their tax excempt status. if you answer yes then they keep it and if you vote no they lose it

in order to give your correct answer that you want you need to overthink it or you are voting yes when you mean no..

reply
Brandon to voice_m... 2012/06/04 15:55:08 (edited)

Now, your just being an ass. I kindly explained it to you and the answers are clearly defined. If you want to read into it then that is your problem not mine. Everyone else seems to be taking it for what it's worth.....

As well you also had another option of OTHER which you clearly ignored....

reply
voice_m... to Brandon 2012/06/05 12:59:02

you question is should churches lose their tax excempt status. if you answer yes then they keep it and if you vote no they lose it

in order to give your correct answer that you want you need to overthink it or you are voting yes when you mean no..

reply
Brandon to voice_m... 2012/06/05 17:35:16

That would be correct if the awnsers were simply yes and no. Then I would agree with your point. However I clearly defined what yes meant as well as what no meant. As well, you also had another option of OTHER which you clearly ignored....

reply
voice_m... to Brandon 2012/06/05 18:06:02

you question is should churches lose their tax excempt status. if you answer yes then they keep it and if you vote no they lose it

in order to give your correct answer that you want you need to overthink it or you are voting yes when you mean no..

reply
Brandon to voice_m... 2012/06/05 18:17:14

That would be correct if the awnsers were simply yes and no. Then I would agree with your point. However I clearly defined what yes meant as well as what no meant. As well, you also had another option of OTHER which you clearly ignored....

reply
voice_m... to Brandon 2012/06/05 19:49:43

i am done with ignorant libs.

reply
jackolantyrn356 2012/06/02 21:10:03

Other...

Before the 1960s when the Democrats impossed these unrighteous L:aws no one had even thought of it.

reply
Waldorf 2012/06/02 15:55:36

No, they should not have it...

Most of their money comes from congregational member income that has already been taxed. There may be fund raising activities that are questionable as perhaps outright retailing or receiving funds from outside the congregation.

reply
Mark P. 2012/06/02 15:26:19

Other...

+2
Then so should Unions, not just churches.

reply
Brandon to Mark P. 2012/06/03 14:52:02

Completely agree.

reply
DJPanicDC 2012/06/02 15:10:44

No, they should not have it...

+1
They want to play in the political system pay the cover charge

reply
Rusty Shackleford 2012/06/02 14:54:16

Yes, they should have it....

+1
I support a flat tax where there are no tax exemptions, tax credits or tax loopholes and every American pay the same tax rate.

reply
lm1b2 2012/06/02 14:50:52

Yes, they should have it....

Definitely,anyone opposed to people like you should have it!

reply
Brandon to lm1b2 2012/06/03 14:52:30

People like me? What does that even mean?

reply
Woody 2012/06/02 14:50:05

Other...

As long as they start with Reverend Wright's Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC), in Chicago...

reply
Christy 2012/06/02 14:45:12

Other...

There are many that should lose that status, but not all. Superchurches, churches that that contribute to political campaigns or legislation changes, churches where the pastors are telling people how to vote....absolutely! But I believe there are probably some churches still around that don't get involved in politics, and actually spend time helping the community...those shouldn't be punished for the actions of others.

reply
Rebel Yell 2012/06/02 14:38:20

Other...

If they are becoming lobbyists for certain causes,( pretty obvious they are) they are making political issues a part of their tenets. As such, they should be taxed.

reply