Quantcast

Should certain things be censored on the internet?

HAHAJKDOTCOM 2012/11/08 17:24:09
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Australia is shifting its plan to censor the internet.

HAHAJK.COM reports:
In an official release yesterday, the Australian government said it has finally backed down on its plan for a controversial mandatory internet filter, and will instead rely on major service providers to block ''the worst of the worst'' child abuse sites.
internet filter rely major service providers block child abuse sites

Read More: http://hahajk.com/entertainment/krikie-australia-a...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • The Bantam Seditioner 2012/11/08 18:40:40
    No, because where will it stop?
    The Bantam Seditioner
    +17
    The Internet is supposed to belong to the people, as a free and open forum for the unfettered exchange of ideas, information, and entertainment. Keep the government's filthy paws off of it.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • La 2012/11/29 10:39:49
    No, because where will it stop?
    La
    As an Australian, that idea was rubbish and I'm glad they finally backed down.
  • Jrogers 2012/11/22 00:12:50
    No, because where will it stop?
    Jrogers
    +1
    Censorship is the parents job - let's not give up our freedom of speech
  • Transquesta 2012/11/18 09:49:12
    No, because where will it stop?
    Transquesta
    Shhh! Maybe if we put on mandatory blinders the cockroaches will go away.
  • Johan Mohamed 2012/11/18 09:47:51
    No, because where will it stop?
    Johan Mohamed
    +1
    Internet is a revelation.
  • Transqu... Johan M... 2012/11/18 09:49:31
    Transquesta
    Tower of Babel. :-)
  • Karl 2012/11/12 19:53:18
    Yes, if it is hateful or pornographic
    Karl
    The only types of pornography that should be banned is non-consensual and child pornography. The vast majority of speech, however, should be protected. Regardless, I'm not very comfortable with the idea of the government filtering the internet.
  • Mya Faire 2012/11/12 17:35:24
    Yes, if it is hateful or pornographic
    Mya Faire
    +4
    Child and snuff pornography should be banned. Other than that, it's up to parents to monitor their children and adults to monitor themselves. If you have a scatalogical fetish and liked "Two Girls and a Cup", by all means enjoy yourself. You won't be bumping into me on those sites, though.
  • Transqu... Mya Faire 2012/11/18 09:51:10
    Transquesta
    +1
    Child and snuff pornography should be banned.

    They already are.
  • BIG BAD JOHN R. 2012/11/12 17:13:26
    No, because where will it stop?
    BIG BAD JOHN R.
    +2
    NO! That's all we need is someone wanting to inflict their views on the rest of the world> The internet is world wide not just here in the US..so who are you going to have make the rules NATO!
  • 2468 2012/11/12 16:55:24
    No, because where will it stop?
    2468
    +2
    An alternative would be rather than restricting sites is to have some kind of "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval."

    Porn sites could be required to have XXX in their domain name or extension making sorting those as off limits as a tool for parents.

    If you clamp down it will only find other ways to boil up to the surface.

    However, I am strongly against any kind of sex with minors by an adult. There is a power differential that is being abused. The larger truth seems to be that the more you go to war with drugs, sex and other issues the more power it gets. Harm reduction means thinking outside of the "ideal box" and working more in the reality zone.
  • Watermusicranger 2012/11/12 15:52:35
    No, because where will it stop?
    Watermusicranger
    +5
    Freedom of Speech
    Freedom of Speech
  • Syl 2012/11/12 15:43:58
    No, because where will it stop?
    Syl
    +3
    You can put age requirements on websites with adult content.
  • overdog001 2012/11/12 15:21:16
    No, because where will it stop?
    overdog001
    +4
    Censorship of any kind, anywhere, is an erosion of liberty. Never volunteer to give away more of your rights. They steal our rights away fast enough as it is.
  • Anarchico Anthony 2012/11/12 14:37:33
    No, because where will it stop?
    Anarchico Anthony
  • Sumātogai 2012/11/12 14:06:47
    No, because where will it stop?
    Sumātogai
    +3
    Censorship divides the world and causes death to free speech.
  • We are making Financial His... 2012/11/12 13:10:07
    Yes, if it is hateful or pornographic
    We are making Financial History
    +2
    The fed violate the fourth admenment and bring thier problems into every one screen to spy. The horrible thing they still fail to protect every one.
  • Transqu... We are ... 2012/11/18 09:52:41
    Transquesta
    Your answer doesn't match your text. :-)
  • We are ... Transqu... 2012/11/18 12:11:25
    We are making Financial History
    +1
    the answer doesnt spell out the infotmation, if u need a text translation then research The 4th admenment judicial review being discuss now in the supreme courts.

    4th admenment
  • Larre 2012/11/12 12:20:01
    No, because where will it stop?
    Larre
    +4
    Indeed.. Why censor a free internet?
  • mike j 2012/11/12 11:50:11
    No, because where will it stop?
    mike j
    +3
    Every Nation in the World has the right , in my opinion to run their internet the way they think is best for their People, but for the United States , the only way is the uncensored, unhindered , unfiltered way.
  • Maulidi Antony 2012/11/12 10:46:11
    No, because where will it stop?
    Maulidi Antony
    +3
    y be unfair to the majority
  • TheTruth1313 2012/11/12 07:12:44
    No, because where will it stop?
    TheTruth1313
    +3
    Not at all. Technology now offers enough ways to secure you own computers without infringing upon the rights of others.
  • LaiLaiHart 2012/11/12 05:43:12
    No, because where will it stop?
    LaiLaiHart
    +3
    No, because if thats the case, then the whole internet should be extincted.
  • SykPuppy 2012/11/12 05:01:42
    No, because where will it stop?
    SykPuppy
    +3
    No, it's a slippery slope. Parents need to take some responsibility and monitor their kids' access or set up a whitelist if they're time-poor or just plain lazy.
  • C4TSMILEY 2012/11/12 02:04:06
    No, because where will it stop?
    C4TSMILEY
    +4
    It is up to the person to filter what they do and don't want to see.
  • Mike 2012/11/12 00:02:21 (edited)
    No, because where will it stop?
    Mike
    +1
    Its not about where it stops, its about where it begins. Where it begins is where it ends. You limit one part of the internet and the liberalism will infect it just like it has infected America's freedom of religion and right to bear arms. Its like entirely removing a biological defense mechanism of the human body, like the skin, or white blood cells -- we all know, once they are gone, it is a ticking clock.
  • paul 2012/11/11 23:07:28 (edited)
    No, because where will it stop?
    paul
    +4
    Nope leave it as it is....thank you man on pc
  • tikiteek 2012/11/11 22:58:47 (edited)
    Yes, if it is hateful or pornographic
    tikiteek
    Alot of people care what thier children are exspose to!
  • Mike tikiteek 2012/11/12 00:00:59
    Mike
    +4
    Then they should take care to pay attention to parental controls on their child's PC and watching them instead of using the damn thing as a babysitter.
  • NoName tikiteek 2012/11/12 00:02:23
    NoName
    +2
    Considering there are ways for the parents to control access, why not just leave it at that?
  • Maurice... NoName 2012/11/12 04:13:17
    Maurice Tillman
    Parental control is way too easy to hack. I know there is the concern about when the sensorship going to stop. However, some things are not appropriate. The net is filled with it. How far are people going to go with their abuse? Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak in the appropriate time and forum. It doesn't give people the right to be offensive. At any rate, if the government has to get involved it's out of hand.
  • Centris... Maurice... 2012/11/12 05:05:14
    Centrist_Bill
    Not with my OS it isnt.
  • Sailor ... Maurice... 2012/12/16 03:33:30
  • Maurice... Sailor ... 2012/12/19 02:16:28
  • Gurney 2012/11/11 22:54:26
    No, because where will it stop?
    Gurney
    +3
    Dodgy sites can be used to track the sicko's.....
    the internet is the voice of the people, a great platform for learning and expression, there should be no contamination of pure raw people power.

    gagging
  • Thomas G Towns 2012/11/11 21:45:27
    No, because where will it stop?
    Thomas G Towns
    +1
    CBS.NBC,CNN,MSNBC,ABC. should be closed down for not reporting anything negative about the Oboman.Slanted news is worse then Porno hopno
  • Fred Fo... Thomas ... 2012/11/11 22:02:58
    Fred For All
    You should be informed that the teabaggers, Fox News, and the ReTHUGlicans ARE against censoring anti-christian themes on the internet. And what you are basically saying here is contradicting what you voted. Censor CNN, NBC, ABC? The hypocrisy!
  • Thomas ... Fred Fo... 2012/11/12 01:20:56 (edited)
    Thomas G Towns
    Not censor close the bastards down You young man have been BOONDOGGLED BAMBOOZELED HOODWINKED STOLEN FROM AND LIED TO and you don't even know it Go back to the mall and play with your little friends..blinders grtawywith
  • gerald.... Thomas ... 2012/11/12 17:45:16
    gerald.rice
    Ok, put that 100,000 dollars a year where your mouth is.
    Tell us how we've been hoodwinked.
    Lets say i have a job making 45,000 a year. Lets say my house is paid for and everyone in my family has a job. Lets say that one of my daughters is gay and another one has a boyfriend, has sex with her boyfriend but uses birth control.
    Now you tell me how is was fooled. Tell me how ANYTHING the republicans said during this
    Election cycle should have resonated positively for me.
    I'll let you know that ive asked this question numerous time in the last year. And although these people started my questions of them by being a loudmouth and then after the read my questions, they disappeared from the conversation.
    Dont be like them. Feed us some facts to back your words.
  • Thomas ... gerald.... 2012/11/14 03:57:47 (edited)
    Thomas G Towns
    What $100,000 a year?

    All the things you mentioned should not be a concern of the Federal Goverment
    What Obaman has given us is....................

    47,000,000 on food stamps, 8% unemployment.Taxes are not going to save the economy but private investment will. Now everybody is waiting on how the Oman is going to turn the economy around. If he has any brains he will and probably will extend the bush tax cuts. If he isn't a down right commie he will be like Clintons second term a closet Republican.Not try to take over industry like Hitler, Stalin,Chevis,Castro, and dozens of other failed socialist. commie
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/20 08:14:38

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals