Democrats may be surprised to learn that Barack Obama officially
DOES NOT officially support Gay Marriage and as of now DOES NOT OFFICIALLY support Gay Marriage.

In fact, president Obama vocally opposed it when he was running for president.
"President Barack Obama’s campaign manager on Wednesday backed away from calls for the Democratic Party to revise its platform to endorse the legalization of same-sex marriage.
“There is a process to go through this discussion,” said campaign manager Jim Messina. By the end of the September convention, he said, “we will have a platform,” but did not say whether it should include a marriage stance."
Should Barack Obama support Gay Marriage?
Everyone. Even the past, current and future president can't know everything and have their very own stupid moments, thus inevitably, they're ignorant too. No one has the best possible answer, but this guy has a good idea.
The fact of the matter is that the country and all it's people have incurred a multi-TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT. There's no immediate relief. It's going to suck for a long time. Sort your priorities out.
Who do you think burdened the country with that debt? Do you think they want to pay it back? They are either dead, aka JFK's mission to the moon, or diverting funds to warcrimes, aka terrorism.
www.drugwarfacts.org/causes.h...
The burden on the medical system for 1 JUNKY OVERDOSE is 10k a DAY, specifically meth lab accidents (source: Drug Inc).
Oboma bashers, if your going to mock someone's drapes make sure it's not your own house burning to the ground. YOU are responsible for YOUR PROBLEMS while he's responsible for the ACCUMULATED PROBLEMS.
Canada welcomes gay marriage, move if you disprove so much. The federal government should not interfere with consensual adult monogamy. Canadian politics have adjusted to meet the democratic action of it's people and as such have officially recognized gay marriage.
He needs to stick with what he campaigned on or stand up and admit he lied to get Christians to vote for him.
His ethics are in the toilet.
However, if the president were to be true to (what I suspect to be) his actual moral beliefs, he would endorse gay marriage. Few believe his stated view reflects his true beliefs on that subject (or really - when you think about it - on a variety of subjects) anyway.
2. Obama betrays whoever he needs to betray for power. Sadly, the liberals like to be abused.
and who is Obama betraying?
Obama knows homo-activists will vote for him no matter what and this is why homo-marriage is not on his platform.
Once again, the gays take it right up the mud-pipe from Obama.
Some people consider this a negative thing.
Why just 2 people? Why not 3, 4, 5? Why is there a limit on the number?
Why the hate?
Who are you to tell two people in love they cannot marry?
Are you not aware of the rates of death and disease among gay men?
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT to tell others if they can marry. BY YOUR definition you are a bigot.
Nobody said anything about under 18 and yes the homosexual activists lobbied to lower the homosexual age of consent in the UK under 18 so you are wrong there too.
Your assertion that health problems from homosexual males is quite false. Any sources to back up that claim?
And how am I a bigot for not getting in peoples sex lives?
Corpses from here to Africa sonny, open your eyes.
You really are poorly informed aren't you?
There is no movement by any elected official to do this. This is no slipery slope.
Are you speaking of aids? Most aids are spread by female prostitutes in Africa!
Namecalling? What name did I call you?
>Are you speaking of aids? Most aids are spread by female prostitutes in Africa!
Sorry son but you are very poorly informed. Homosexual men have the highest rates of STD's in the USA. If you are going to argue against incest on health rules, you need to ban homosexuality among men.
Be consistent instead of just blindly following liberal dogma.
Even if your argument is true how does legalizing gay marriage result in more STD's being spread?
You first. It's an old liberal technique:
1. Offer no evidence
2. After rebuttal demand evidence
3. After receiving evidence, dismiss as right-wing propaganda
"Even if your argument is true how does legalizing gay marriage result in more STD's being spread?"
You have to understand that it is tedious chatting with somebody simple.
YOU said that you oppose incest on health grounds.
I said that if you oppose on health grounds then homosexuality among men should be illegal.
I am bored with this.
Good day.
Woulden't marriage create more stable relationships and allow for less STD's to be spread?
*sigh*
This is so boring.
What a poor, foolish child.
So sad how the government schools have damaged children.
Find another person to talk to.
1) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/af...
2) http://southafrica-pig.blogsp...
WE THE PEOPLE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
www.kony2012.com/
To name an example > www.drugwarfacts.org/causes.htm
A second example > http://www.cdc.gov/Features/D...
It's very interesting stuff when you take the time to verify facts.
Do you even read your own links?
Certainly been called worse today.
http://images.sodahead.com/pr...
Homosexuals enjoy rights like other citizens and therefore don't need minority status and special civil rights. As Americans, homosexuals are entitled to equal rights, not special rights. Their behavior-based lifestyle does not qualify for privileged minority status under U.S. law.
All individuals; good, bad, homosexual or heterosexual are protected under the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. As a class, the courts have repeatedly denied homosexuals their claim to "insular and discreet" minority status, quotas and affirmative action. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a race. Homosexuality is defined by the act of sodomy. This behavior is not constitutionally protected as per the Supreme Court ruling in Bowers vs. Hardwick.