
Should America Adopt a Fat Tax?
SodaHead News
2012/05/21 16:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
142 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
285 votes
|
|
67% | |||
Several months ago, Denmark became the first country in the world to adopt a "fat tax." The tax increased the price of certain fatty foods based on the fat content, kind of like the excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco that are already in place. Don't worry, there's currently no legislation in America threatening to tax fatty foods, but researchers are making a case for it in terms of fighting obesity.
Dr. Eric Wright, head of Indiana University School of Medicine's Department of Public Health, told RTV6, "We've applied tax to alcohol and tobacco and that has definitely shown through very many studies that it actually decreased use. So, the logic has been applied to fatty foods and preliminary evidence in Europe is that it’s very effective." The study suggests a 20 percent tax on cheeseburgers, but doesn't give any other examples. It expects to cut obesity rates by 3.5 and prevent 2,700 deaths. Do you think America should adopt a "fat tax"?

Dr. Eric Wright, head of Indiana University School of Medicine's Department of Public Health, told RTV6, "We've applied tax to alcohol and tobacco and that has definitely shown through very many studies that it actually decreased use. So, the logic has been applied to fatty foods and preliminary evidence in Europe is that it’s very effective." The study suggests a 20 percent tax on cheeseburgers, but doesn't give any other examples. It expects to cut obesity rates by 3.5 and prevent 2,700 deaths. Do you think America should adopt a "fat tax"?

Top Opinion
-
The Libertarian 2012/05/21 17:32:36






















for skinny folks-
Here is the reality in America. The poorer you are the fatter you are. Raising taxes on fatty food means that the poor Americans are less capable to buy food. Since this tax would directly affect the poor in this country and poor are classified under minority (blacks, Hispanics, whites but mostly blacks), it would be direct assault on minorities.
I assume that such tax would be seen in our country as a tax on poor rather than a fatty tax. Don't forget the diabetics, minority, they are fat too and protected by the ADA.
How about instead of fatty tax, like in Denmark, we implement a politician tax since they are being paid from taxpayer's money anyway. Let's say all the public officials pay 50% tax on their income. It is our money anyway? We pay for half of their SS, Medicare, almost all of their pension and healthcare, unemployment insurance. Why not impose a fatty tax on the people who are getting fat on your tax dollars instead on food they eat.
They have a choice to eat a salad or burger; the taxpayers don't have a choice to pay for one or the other.
rose
I have to disagree.
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/ch...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/r...
If the government is collecting such data, if scientists (funded by the government) are collecting such data, such data is collected for the government to:
A. Recognize a problem
B. Analyze the problem
C. Find optimum solution to the problem
D. Implement the solution to the problem
If collected data shows that minorities are the low-income population and obesity plaques low-income population, wouldn’t it mean minorities are obese?
Therefore; if the government wants to implement a fatty tax, it would be a direct assault on minorities done knowingly and with purpose.
I had this crazy idea of tying the politicians, public servants compensation to nation’s average compensation of workers in public sector. Same salary of $42,000 a year same health insurance and same 401K plan as everyone else. My gut tells me that this simple rule would save the taxpayer a lot of money that we have to borrow from China or the Fed. It would weed out carrier politicians and maybe put people in the office who actually care about the USA rather than their own asses.
Just a thought.
Or we could tie the politician’s salaries and benefits to those in military. They both serve the country right? Why there is a difference?
You get more flies with honey, people.
I get "it's the not governments job to tell me what I can eat" and I agree, if you are paying for your own healthcare bills.