Sheriff Joe offers evidence in Florida
|
|
|||||
|
65 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
64 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
7% | |||
The case of Voeltz v. Obama is simple. Mike Voeltz is a
registered Democrat and lives in Florida. He says that the Democratic
Party cheated him of his vote by having on the ballot the name of a
candidate who may not run. Specifically, Voeltz says that Barack Obama
may not run for President because he is not a natural born citizen.
Judge Terry Lewis in Leon County, Florida, scheduled a hearing for Monday, June 18, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Voeltz asked Larry Klayman, of Judicial Watch
fame, to plead his case. Klayman sent in a brief saying in detail what a
natural born citizen is, and is not. The Constitution (Article II,
Section 1, paragraph 5) says that only a natural born citizen may even run for President. Klayman cited a case (Minor v. Happersett, 1875) that is the only case
that defines a natural born citizen in any detail. That case describes a
natural born citizen as a person born in the country to two citizen parents. That is the only place in the opinion where that phrase “natural born citizen” shows up.
Klayman said further that the Framers used the phrase natural born citizen for a reason:
The framers were not stupid. They understood that a
president with divided loyalties could present a security and other
risks for our nation.
The White House lawyers say that anyone born in-country is a natural born citizen, wherever the parents were born. But while Klayman cited a case to back him up, the White House legal team did not. So Judge Lewis ordered the White House to back up their idea of what a natural born citizen can be. He also ordered them to show original documents to prove that Obama is a natural born citizen.
Sheriff Joe comes to testify

Alvin
T. Onaka, the Hawaii registrar, seems to be whimsical: he turned the
capital "A" of his signature into a "smiley face." Note also that he
misspells "THE" as "TXE" on what should be a rubber stamp. Now Sheriff
Joe Arpaio says that someone pasted this stamp in, and that gives him
probable cause to suspect forgery. Photo: CNAV
Early this morning, WND reported that Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, swore
to his role in investigating Obama eligibility in his State. The leader
of his Cold Case Posse, former New Jersey detective Mike Zullo, swore to his own role, as did WND reporter Jerome Corsi. Arpaio and Corsi both appeared before their notaries yesterday; Mike Zullo saw a notary the day before.
“Sheriff Joe” says that the Obama long-form birth certificate is not
a copy of a paper document. Instead, says the sheriff, someone built it
on a computer. Worse, someone copied a picture of the “registrar’s
stamp” from somewhere else and pasted it in. (CNAV has already shown that the file is full of mistakes. Among other things, that “registrar’s stamp” spells the word THE as TXE.) That is why Arpaio found “probable cause” that the White House file is a forgery.
Mike Zullo went further. He said that Hawaiian officials have told
different stories over the last five years on whether Barack Obama even has a birth certificate.
Klayman also introduced a copy of Jerome Corsi’s book, Where’s the Real Birth Certificate? as evidence. Corsi needed to swear in writing that his book was accurate.
In other news, Hawaii officials still treat the Obama eligibility question as if it were radioactive. Ask yourself why should they, if there's nothing left to dispute?
And now the question for all of you: is this great? A yawner? Or what?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/13...
Top Opinion
-
SmittenKitten 2012/06/14 02:07:39Yawn! We've been over this before.





















Let me guess... your a member of flatearthsociety.org too, right?
Alen West will always be the better man. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you deal with it.
OBSTRUCTION SINCE BUSH LEFT OFFICE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.pfaw.org/media-cen...
http://politicalhumor.about.c...
http://apps.detnews.com/apps/... Obstructionism
WHATEVER OBAMA IS FOR, THE GOP IS AGAINST!
http://www.salon.com/ne... GOP IS AGAINST
http://politicalticker.blogs....
http://articles.boston.com/20...
http://www.frumforum.com/can-...
http://swampland.time.com/201...
GOP HOSTAGE TAKING
http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09...
http://videocafe.crooksandlia...
http://themoderatevoice.com/1...
http://mykeystrokes.com/2011/...
http://www.eclectablog.com/20...
http://www.chron.com/opinion/...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0...
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/...
http://fdlaction.firedoglake....
http://georgemiller.house.gov...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/...
GOP WANTS THE ECONOMY TO FAIL
http://www.washingtonmonthly....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.politicususa.com/e...
http://tech.mit.edu/V112/N5/c...
http://thinkprogress.org/romm...
http://m.lasvegassun.com/news...
http://crooksandliars.com/joh...
http://mydd.com/2010/1/7/what...
http://www.businessinsider.co...
http://www.inthesetimes.com/a...
h...
OBSTRUCTION SINCE BUSH LEFT OFFICE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.pfaw.org/media-cen...
http://politicalhumor.about.c...
http://apps.detnews.com/apps/... Obstructionism
WHATEVER OBAMA IS FOR, THE GOP IS AGAINST!
http://www.salon.com/ne... GOP IS AGAINST
http://politicalticker.blogs....
http://articles.boston.com/20...
http://www.frumforum.com/can-...
http://swampland.time.com/201...
GOP HOSTAGE TAKING
http://www.sacbee.com/2011/09...
http://videocafe.crooksandlia...
http://themoderatevoice.com/1...
http://mykeystrokes.com/2011/...
http://www.eclectablog.com/20...
http://www.chron.com/opinion/...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/0...
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/...
http://fdlaction.firedoglake....
http://georgemiller.house.gov...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/...
GOP WANTS THE ECONOMY TO FAIL
http://www.washingtonmonthly....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
http://www.politicususa.com/e...
http://tech.mit.edu/V112/N5/c...
http://thinkprogress.org/romm...
http://m.lasvegassun.com/news...
http://crooksandliars.com/joh...
http://mydd.com/2010/1/7/what...
http://www.businessinsider.co...
http://www.inthesetimes.com/a...
http://robertreich.org/post/3...
http://www.hermes-press.com/s
http://theweek.com/bullpen/co...
http://www.expressmilwaukee.c...
Hows it working for you so far Bubba Monkey?
The trouble with radicals is that they only read radical literature, and the trouble with conservatives is that they don't read anything.
The two pillars of 'political correctness are: a) willful ignorance, b) a steadfast refusal to face the truth.
It is amazing how many conservatives who consider themselves "thinking people" respond automatically to words the way Pavlov's dog was conditioned to respond to certain sounds.
I love this! So true!
I have no desire or responsibility to prove your conspiracy theory that has never been proven or has any legs. I am a satisfied customer that Obama was born in Hawaii, and is a qualified U.S. citizen, so why would I want to run around in circles like you half-wits are doing? If you keep doing the same thing and keep getting the same results, who is it that runs on ideologies that bear only a tangential relationship to reality? Is this a kind of conservative rationalized irrationality? Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha!
I love bitch-slapping you little half-wits around. So consider yourself gotten back to Neanderthal. What is it that you think you have proven as I didn't see one FACT or TRUTH that demonstrates you have proven anything? You claim I have no rebuttal for the facts? WHAT FACTS? You must live in your own little world, because conservatives live in an impervious bubble that never lets a fact in? Show the facts you think you have pr...
I have no desire or responsibility to prove your conspiracy theory that has never been proven or has any legs. I am a satisfied customer that Obama was born in Hawaii, and is a qualified U.S. citizen, so why would I want to run around in circles like you half-wits are doing? If you keep doing the same thing and keep getting the same results, who is it that runs on ideologies that bear only a tangential relationship to reality? Is this a kind of conservative rationalized irrationality? Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha!
I love bitch-slapping you little half-wits around. So consider yourself gotten back to Neanderthal. What is it that you think you have proven as I didn't see one FACT or TRUTH that demonstrates you have proven anything? You claim I have no rebuttal for the facts? WHAT FACTS? You must live in your own little world, because conservatives live in an impervious bubble that never lets a fact in? Show the facts you think you have proven Bubba?
You really do have a intelligence deficit. The definition of "MOOT" is "Of no practical importance, irrelevant. Irrelevant or insignificant describe you perfectly! I understand that this would be a better debate if it were on a more level playing field, and I wish I had a lower I.Q., so that I could enjoy your company. I have this big old heart and can forgive you for your mental illness, but having this ability for those in need like yourself, I will hold your hand and help you through the scary parts. Bubba let me be your teacher because education is learning what you didn't even know -- you didn't know.
Half-wit, you must always think about things, and you must think about things as they are, not as your private opinions and myths think they are. Do you get the distinct feeling that your in way over your head half-wit? Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha! You are the kind of gift that just keeps on giving. Your racism is showing!
MITT ROMNEY'S HILARIOUS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS!
http://www.landoverbaptist.or...
http://www.artipot.com/articl...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
MITT ROMNEY ON PRINCIPLES AND VALUES
http://www.issues2000.org/201...
http://www.realchange.org/rom...
MITT ROMNEY'S FLIP FLOPS
http://www.politifact.com/tru...
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/...
http://www.mittromneysflipflo...
I'm pretty sure he was manufactured on the island of assh*les and was fashioned out of torn off bits of the Communist Manifesto and pasted together with Kenyon yak dung.
In that case he ought to burn just fine ... a Nov 06 barbeque sounds good. All you leftys are invited too! Conservatism is a huge tent.
:-)
Together, you and your buddy above you make a wit.
Have you considered upping your ante to 3cents, maybe? ...... :-)
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
Anyone born inside the United States *
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition:...
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
Anyone born inside the United States *
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law — the person must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example.
No where does it specifically state that each rule both parents have to be US citizens to qualify. Please read this and understand Obama is a US citizen.