Sheriff Joe offers evidence in Florida
|
|
|||||
|
65 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
64 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
7% | |||
The case of Voeltz v. Obama is simple. Mike Voeltz is a
registered Democrat and lives in Florida. He says that the Democratic
Party cheated him of his vote by having on the ballot the name of a
candidate who may not run. Specifically, Voeltz says that Barack Obama
may not run for President because he is not a natural born citizen.
Judge Terry Lewis in Leon County, Florida, scheduled a hearing for Monday, June 18, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. Voeltz asked Larry Klayman, of Judicial Watch
fame, to plead his case. Klayman sent in a brief saying in detail what a
natural born citizen is, and is not. The Constitution (Article II,
Section 1, paragraph 5) says that only a natural born citizen may even run for President. Klayman cited a case (Minor v. Happersett, 1875) that is the only case
that defines a natural born citizen in any detail. That case describes a
natural born citizen as a person born in the country to two citizen parents. That is the only place in the opinion where that phrase “natural born citizen” shows up.
Klayman said further that the Framers used the phrase natural born citizen for a reason:
The framers were not stupid. They understood that a
president with divided loyalties could present a security and other
risks for our nation.
The White House lawyers say that anyone born in-country is a natural born citizen, wherever the parents were born. But while Klayman cited a case to back him up, the White House legal team did not. So Judge Lewis ordered the White House to back up their idea of what a natural born citizen can be. He also ordered them to show original documents to prove that Obama is a natural born citizen.
Sheriff Joe comes to testify

Alvin
T. Onaka, the Hawaii registrar, seems to be whimsical: he turned the
capital "A" of his signature into a "smiley face." Note also that he
misspells "THE" as "TXE" on what should be a rubber stamp. Now Sheriff
Joe Arpaio says that someone pasted this stamp in, and that gives him
probable cause to suspect forgery. Photo: CNAV
Early this morning, WND reported that Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, swore
to his role in investigating Obama eligibility in his State. The leader
of his Cold Case Posse, former New Jersey detective Mike Zullo, swore to his own role, as did WND reporter Jerome Corsi. Arpaio and Corsi both appeared before their notaries yesterday; Mike Zullo saw a notary the day before.
“Sheriff Joe” says that the Obama long-form birth certificate is not
a copy of a paper document. Instead, says the sheriff, someone built it
on a computer. Worse, someone copied a picture of the “registrar’s
stamp” from somewhere else and pasted it in. (CNAV has already shown that the file is full of mistakes. Among other things, that “registrar’s stamp” spells the word THE as TXE.) That is why Arpaio found “probable cause” that the White House file is a forgery.
Mike Zullo went further. He said that Hawaiian officials have told
different stories over the last five years on whether Barack Obama even has a birth certificate.
Klayman also introduced a copy of Jerome Corsi’s book, Where’s the Real Birth Certificate? as evidence. Corsi needed to swear in writing that his book was accurate.
In other news, Hawaii officials still treat the Obama eligibility question as if it were radioactive. Ask yourself why should they, if there's nothing left to dispute?
And now the question for all of you: is this great? A yawner? Or what?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/06/13...
Top Opinion
-
SmittenKitten 2012/06/14 02:07:39Yawn! We've been over this before.




















IF, ODUMBO were a Legal Candidate, Why all the Delays, The Atty Gen, appealing on his Behalf to have Documents Dismissed, Transcripts Not Provided when requested, etc...???
Does THIS sound as if he Has Something To Hide...YOU BET...
CBS, NBC and ABC are all BS reporting...
I Like Fox Business News, BBC, Forbes, Bulls and Bears .etc...
Morning Joe on MSNBC.
When one come out feeling BOTH sides WINS and BOTH sides LOSE, then it's pretty balanced. That's what Morning Joe does for me.
I also like Jon Stewart, even though he is liberal, he gets on the 24 hour news networks for their obvious bias, expecially Fox News
But it's funny also when Joe goes on one of his binges...
He's funny!
and poor Mika... LOL
Jon Stewart is da bomb... nuff said.
For having both sides represented...Megan Kelly on FOX
Mika's dad has to be one of this planets smartest humans. He actually ties it all together... Mika not's the dumb blonde you may think she is.
I do NOT Like Either Of them and never have...
Some of the attempts at humor aren't humorous. But I do like the panels they pick.
We do agree on the BBC though...
I Like Fox Business News More than Fox News...
Just asking... does it have a conservative spin to it?
Just the Constitution and the Laws that it governs and the abuse of those laws..doesn't matter which side is abusing...
What time is it on?
The ONLY accurate journalist I have seen in years is Ben Swann channel 19 in Cincinnati
so what does it matter when about 2 dozen cases have been dismissed or ruled in Obama's favor and you birthers just continue to come with more and more crap. wasting more and more taxpayers money on frivolous suites
But, NOT In My Mind...
Even the So Called Verification from HI to the Sec of State in AZ, has inconsistancies...
For instance..this Verification Does NOT show Date of Birth..Only Time...
The Case in FL has NOT been resolved yet..not until next week when it will be heard...
that is the answer to the questio put forward to the Sec of state because he asked if it was a valid Birth Certificate and he sent a copy to Alvin Onaka. so It does not matter if he added the date of birth, He asked for a verification that Obama was born in HI. and that is what he got.
and I am not a lib. I just know this birther crap is Bullshi
http://www.azcentral.com/news...