Sheriff Joe Arpaio presented his case to the American people and stated that Barack Obama's long form birth certificate was forged. He called upon Congress to investigate. Should Congress investigate the alleged forgery?
Washington Times
2012/07/18 19:29:20
|
|
|||||
|
15,710 votes
|
|
94% | |||
|
625 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
315 votes
|
|
2% | |||
Top Opinion
-
BOUNTYQUEEN 2012/08/11 05:25:16Yes. It is the responsibility of Congress to investigate potentially criminal...
+3If it wasn't true Obama would just give the true proof. Since he won't it needs to be investigated. I think he's application to college should also be checked out...I think he lied on that too.
This is a new era and the one you lived in is gone and gone forever, so get use to your new life with fewer material things in it. Maybe they'll be replaced with morals.
Thank you all for taking the time to counter the left's lies.
1. Register to Vote!
2. Demand Congress depose and prosecute Obama, along with his co-conspirators! Any politician or judge refusing this duty in violation of their oath of office, should also be regarded as a co-conspirator and similarly deposed or voted out of office!
3. Boycott mainstream media advertisers for enabling the worst cover-up in American history. Money talks, tell them why you're buying from the competition!
Obama loathes our Constitutional republic and individual rights.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, ... that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, ... Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." - Declaration of Independence
Obama routinely omits 'Creator' when speaking of unalienable rights.
No 'Creator' = no unalienable rights!
Conservatives must stop omitting Art 2, Sec 1, of the Constitution when speaking of Obama!
"The usurper Obama is not eligible for multiple reasons:
1. Failure to be a "natural born citizen" as required by Article 2, Section 1.
2. Being born a British citizen pursuant to British Nationality Act of 1948.
3. Law enforcement investigators have concluded his birth certificate is fraudulent."[1]
1. www.ObamaBirthCertificate.net
But I will agree with you on one general point that you hold: one of the men from the two major parties that ran for president in 2008 wasn't born in the United States. It's just not the one you keep coming after. Now stop being a nitwit.
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
And no, the governor of Hawaii was not unable to find Obama's birth certificate.
http://www.thefogbow.com/birt...
JUDICIAL RESTRAINT
It’s important to note that the Supreme Court in Minor did not hold that all women born in the US were citizens. Only those born to citizen parents in the US were deemed to be citizens by the Court in Minor.
Since the Court was not required to construe the 14th Amendment – as to Mrs. Minor’s citizenship – the Court refrained from doing so. Instead, the Court construed Article 2 Section 1 as an independent ground by which the Court determined that Mrs. Minor was a natural-born citizen since she had been born in the US to parents who were citizens.
Chester A. Arthur - Not an NBC [Natural Born Citizen] maybe not even an Citizen (just like BHO). He was NOT an Article II NBC since he was born of before his father's naturalization some 14 years after his birth. (He was installed in the office of the president due to the assassination of President Garfield.) But based on the facts uncovered in later history, Arthur was unconstitutionally seated because he had falsified his nativity story and fraudulently held himself out as a Natural Born Citizen.
Chester Arthur's crime was not fully discovered and proven until long after his death as he had burned all his early family records to cover up the deceit. He was born in 1829, in VT(though this, too, is in question.)
Smells and tastes alot like Barack Obama--hiding facts and documents in SEALED records (not much different from BURNED, if the records are never un-sealed even one hundred years from now), disputed birthplace and born of alien father.
Barack Obama Sr., widely known, accepted and admitted by Obama, Jr. himself, was a Kenyan National/British Subject who returned to Kenya after his education in the US. He was NEVER a citizen of t...
Chester A. Arthur - Not an NBC [Natural Born Citizen] maybe not even an Citizen (just like BHO). He was NOT an Article II NBC since he was born of before his father's naturalization some 14 years after his birth. (He was installed in the office of the president due to the assassination of President Garfield.) But based on the facts uncovered in later history, Arthur was unconstitutionally seated because he had falsified his nativity story and fraudulently held himself out as a Natural Born Citizen.
Chester Arthur's crime was not fully discovered and proven until long after his death as he had burned all his early family records to cover up the deceit. He was born in 1829, in VT(though this, too, is in question.)
Smells and tastes alot like Barack Obama--hiding facts and documents in SEALED records (not much different from BURNED, if the records are never un-sealed even one hundred years from now), disputed birthplace and born of alien father.
Barack Obama Sr., widely known, accepted and admitted by Obama, Jr. himself, was a Kenyan National/British Subject who returned to Kenya after his education in the US. He was NEVER a citizen of the US, naturalized or otherwise. Therefore, Obama, Jr. was born of an alien father which disqualifies him for the office of president of the United States. (Per Vatel, in Law of Nations (1758) and codified into our jurisprudence by the US Supreme Court in Minor v Happerset (1875), one must be born in the country of two parents who are its citizens to be a natural born citizen. So, even assuming that Obama, Jr. was born in Hawaii, it matters not at all since he is NOT a natural born citizen by virtue of his father NOT being a US citizen at the time of his birth.)
There are counters to my line of argument that employ the 14th Amendment (1868) to the US Constitution, United States v Wong Kim Ark (1898) and others that have detractors and supporters among very astute and brilliant legal scholars.
Now, it is clear that the final arbiter of US jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of the United States must have the final word. Politics of the day should not influence so critical a Constitutional question.
L. Todd House, MD