If I found it at a yard sale or flea market for a quarter----I might. I'm a historian and Antiquarian Bookman---I might read it?? I might not. We are also involved in the domestic violence, criminal field. After watching some of the trial and what led up to it------should have been hanged, horse whipped or thrown in a plain cell until she died-----miserably. When she get there I hope she is properly informed.
So, it's not written yet!! So what. If it is my answer still applies. I'm not tolerant enough for you?? My position----we judge them here-----the Lord judges them there. Hanged. Then she can talk with the Lord.
She's like that Sil......just pass on it....It matters not if the book is written or in the planning stages......let's hope that no one would be interested enough to back it financially.....Until JOHN EDWARDS.....trial....She was in the Number one position of the most HATED person ...and in good company!!!
I would, in fact, buy the book. Number one, would want to see what spin she's trying to foist upon us. Number two, that's money I choose to put in her pocket to help feed eight kids as opposed to the gov needing to take more out of my taxes. Number three, not sure she can ever get a job that will enable her to be able to raise all those children without government help. So she needs the sales.
Well, Sister Jean, isn't that just graphic. So you would rather we all contribute to this offensive young lady for her lifetime as opposed to spending $10 and her being able to live on her own? Not fair, and we all think she didn't get what she deserved, but I would rather not support her for her entire life. I can always use the book as a doorstop, I don't have to read it.
Well, just excuse the heck out of me. I went and got my glasses. This is not OctoMom. Being able to see sure helps. I still might buy this gal's book just to see the spin. Again, if it helps keep her off the dole and it only costs me the price of a book to do that, I'd spend the money gladly. Let's see, $10 for a book or a lifetime of paying more in taxes to the gov because she has no choice but to take government handouts. Doesn't mean I have to read it if I choose not to do so.
..............." Lou............................. You're An Idiot " ...........and a Liar!.........as well............... stop trashing, thought provoking sensible posts........ with Your Garbage.......
No I will not buy her book, just not for the self-righteous reasons most of the people here give. I am not going to buy it simply because I'm not interested, but it has nothing to do with my feelings about her guilt or innocence.
As for her guilt or innocence, a Jury found her not-guilty. Regardless of reason, right or wrong, we are nation of laws and those laws apply to everyone. Nor do I take public opinion in these matters seriously, as the public tends to be a bunch of idiots who act on their emotions rather than facts/logic. If necessary, people will create their own facts.
Since I have not been given some divine insight as to what happened, I accept the Jury's verdict as is and have long moved on from this case. If she is guilty, then she will answer for that in another life.
CF, I only know of just one instance of that (fortunately), but I'm aware of her CONSTANT desire for all of the other "specialties" that she avails herself of all the time.
No - obviously. Guilty without a doubt in a criminal court. Even if one juror had a doubt it could sway the jury. That is all it takes. The juror is more powerful than a judge. Do you feel the same way as the media trying the defendant in George Zimmerman's case?
The jury system is the only system we have and I support . If Zimmerman is exonerated then that's the decision of the court. The important issue is that he be held to account in a criminal court as a matter of fairness. What happens after that is up to the jury. That is what it's there for.
I do agree. The Jury is the only system and I do support the constitutionality of this fair system. It is true. The media has even led me to judge people. It has the unfortunate taint of the killing of an innocent child. And I wasn't there to hear any testimony. Point taken.
deranged individual.
As for her guilt or innocence, a Jury found her not-guilty. Regardless of reason, right or wrong, we are nation of laws and those laws apply to everyone. Nor do I take public opinion in these matters seriously, as the public tends to be a bunch of idiots who act on their emotions rather than facts/logic. If necessary, people will create their own facts.
Since I have not been given some divine insight as to what happened, I accept the Jury's verdict as is and have long moved on from this case. If she is guilty, then she will answer for that in another life.
CF, I only know of just one instance of that (fortunately), but I'm aware of her CONSTANT desire for all of the other "specialties" that she avails herself of all the time.