Quantcast

September 11, 2001. Conspiracy or Terrorists?

Des 2007/11/13 22:24:24
Terrorists, because....
Conspiracy, because...
I have seen justifiable evidence of both, but here is what I think...
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I'm sure there are varying opinions on here, especially if any of you have seen Loose Change. Don't get all emotional about it or anything. Simply give your answer and why.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • ronin 2008/09/12 20:18:00
    I have seen justifiable evidence of both, but here is what I think...
    ronin

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • DEEP Dusty 2007/11/14 22:03:38
  • jon Dusty 2009/07/16 06:36:09 (edited)
    jon
    There have been several attempts which were foiled after the implementation of waterboarding was used against the mastermind of 9/11. A plan to hit the tallest building in L.A. was targeted but the cell was caught before they were able to carry out the plan. There were a couple others but I can't remember off the top of my head.

    ETA: Here is a link to a story on the L.A. biz: http://cnsnews.com/public/con...
  • Spider20 B4Real2Me 2007/11/14 05:49:08 (edited)
    Spider20
    Hi, B4real.....airport security is much stronger now........I have flown recently and can tell you for fact that security has definitley been beefed up......and there are security forces all over the place at out little town's airport......where we used to have only a light contingent.....and I really don't see shopping malls as being terrorist targets just yet....I don't think we're that far along.....I would imagine we have forces/resources hard at work trying to disrupt terrorist plans as much as possible, and that we don't hear about their work that much, for an obvious reason......
  • B4Real2Me Spider20 2007/11/14 21:24:03
    B4Real2Me
    Your airport is just one airport in this country, even this morning they released a report concerning airport security and the report said that most security inspections aren't accurate because someone in authority knew of the inspection prior to them actually coming that day to perform the inspection. Not to mention I too have flown since 9/11 and yes I've seen and noticed stronger presence of cops and other authority figures within the many airports that I've been in. However I have also seen unsecured luggage sitting around in the airports with no person there to claim it. I have seen people walk around the metal detective machines. I have seen people sneak stuff onto planes. Heck, I once and reported this dude to the authorities at an airport because this dude walked around the security machines and my gut feeling was something wasn't right with that dude.

    Thanksgiving is suppose to be the busiest traveling period with more people traveling than as oppose to any other time. All those people coming and going, all those luggage and bags for the airlines to keep up with, folks tired, planes running late, folks fussing, airline employees stressed and thinking that they’re not getting paid enough for all their headaches and now factor in some terrorist plot. I don’t think it’s going to happen but who would have thought that 9/11 would have happened prior to it actually happening? History tend to repeat itself… Vietnam than and Iraq now.
  • Spider20 B4Real2Me 2007/11/14 21:28:22
    Spider20
    Then you should know by now that this whole thing will be an imperfect system.....why? Because humans are involved and the threats don't seem as serious now......and know it will be this way until either the next terrorist attack on American soil, or we get into a major war, as in a world war.......
  • sweetpe... Spider20 2007/11/16 18:14:10
    sweetpeachie
    Read this. I think we need to take a step back and assume that no place is safe, no matter how much security there is in an airport.

    http://www.gjsentinel.com/new...
  • Spider20 sweetpe... 2007/11/21 23:18:35
    Spider20
    +1
    I agree, I don't mean to give the impression that I think flying is totally terrorist proof, because it isn't.....I don't think many of these new TSA agents have had either adequate training or experience.....they got rushed through to get somebody into the position, best qualified candidate or not.....when I recently flew, I got tagged for extra screening at every stop......I was going to a funeral, short notice flyer, light baggage.....and I keep thinking that while I'm getting the 3rd degree, a potential terrorist might be getting through......because human error is such a key factor in this issue, don't take it for granted that any place is safe.....my bottom line is this - I have no doubt that security at many locations is better than what it used to be, I have seen it........but I also have no doubt that there are still weaknesses in these systems....nonetheless, if I have to travel via the airlines, I am going....but I do keep a sharper lookout these days......
  • ANTI NWO Spider20 2009/05/03 15:13:50
    ANTI NWO
    Security is stepped up for you and me not terrorists....simply stepping up the police state
  • Spider20 ANTI NWO 2009/05/03 17:30:14
    Spider20
    Yeah, right....
  • DEEP B4Real2Me 2007/11/14 22:02:28
  • B4Real2Me DEEP 2007/11/15 20:27:34
    B4Real2Me
    Not to mention, they have no intentions of protecting the borders because who would maintain their lawns, cook their food, watch their children, do their laundry and all the other many things that all the illegal immigrants do for them?
  • mik 2007/11/14 00:21:21 (edited)
    Conspiracy, because...
    mik
    +1
    its all air pressure......air pressure is a conspiracy to cover it up. Ok done with joking it was all (prisedant before bush) fault, he never warned anyone.
  • COMALite J mik 2008/09/11 23:58:22
    COMALite J
    Mik, you're absolutely right! Clinton never warned us about bin Laden, al-Qaeda, or the Islamofascist threat in general.

    Well, unless you count when Clinton specifically warned Bush that Osama bin Laden was the greatest threat to our security in the “exit interview” in which the outgoing President advised the incoming President about what’s what in the nation and world.

    But besides that, you’re absolutely right.

    Well, except for when Clinton retaliated against al-Qaeda for the 1994 WTC bombing and other terrorist acts. He might have done more, but, well, there was this Starr Chamber investigation going on that was supPOSED to be about Whitewater and financial improprieties, but somehow after spending tens of millions of taxpayer money turned into a sex scandal about some intern named Monica Lewinski instead. And when Clinton bombed the terrorists, do you remember what happened? Does the phrase “Wag the Dog” ring a bell? Yep. The REPUBLICANS in Congress (not to mention Rush Limbaugh and his ilk) accused Clinton of using the terrorist bombings and his response to them as an attempt to DISTRACT our attention from the FAR more important BLOW JOB in the OVAL OFFICE!

    But other than that, well, yes, you're right.
  • TeaDea 2007/11/13 23:39:09
    Terrorists, because....
    TeaDea
    +1
    No Because TERRORISTS
  • Spider20 2007/11/13 23:25:11
    None of the above
    Spider20
    It was terrorists conspiring to do harm to the USA....and I have news, they're still plotting and planning.....so, I guess you'd say I'm saying it was both of the above poll options combined......I have done and continue to do research, including a recent talk with an architect......and I don't believe our govt. conspired against the U.S. citizenry at all.......
  • ANTI NWO Spider20 2009/05/03 15:14:52
    ANTI NWO
    terrorists = globalists, not Islamic extreamists WAKE UP AMERICA
  • Regulus [99 - INSHALLAH] 2007/11/13 23:20:42
    I have seen justifiable evidence of both, but here is what I think...
    Regulus [99 - INSHALLAH]
    +3
    I've heard that Bush was warned by the CIA in August, but did not give the order to stop it.
  • Dusty Regulus... 2007/11/14 02:29:56
    Dusty
    +2
    I heard the plans were landed and the people murdered by members of the CIA, would you beleive that too? Just as crazy. If he knew, he would have stopped, why wouldn't he?
  • Linda54 Dusty 2008/01/06 02:29:27
    Linda54
    Hey Dusty, thanks for all your good comments, or should I say all the truths. I did not vote for Bush, I may not even like him and I am not going to go into a big political debate with these people but I cannot understand how any one can even think to blame 911 on our Government. How can someone claim to be an American and hate Americans?
  • mommaD Linda54 2008/09/11 20:13:34
    mommaD
    Your question evades me. Do you believe someone seeking truth of the events of 911 does so simply and only because they hate Americans? Do you ever consider that because they are Americans they question? What happened on 911 was preplanned and evil. The victims as well as every American deserves justice for who was in control of this treachery. Maybe it's not about destroying America rather it's preserving our America. The one who honored the Geneva Conventions.
  • hybrid ... Linda54 2008/09/13 02:19:18
    hybrid rogue
    +1
    What does noting that the gansters took over the gavernment have to do with, "Hating America"?

    America was born of dissent..."Those who prefer a bit of temporary security and give up essential liberty deserve neither,"
    --Ben Franklin
  • ANTI NWO Linda54 2009/05/03 15:16:57
    ANTI NWO
    It is hard to believe but look at the facts and then start asking questions. If you want some talking points, message me and i will provide you with many
  • hybrid ... Dusty 2008/09/13 02:14:58 (edited)
    hybrid rogue
    FACTS for you Dusty, that you obviously DIDN"T learn in your supposed physics classes:

    Kerosene burns at roughly 875 degrees under optimum conditions (oxygen source) Hardened steel such as that used in the WTC beams and girders needs temperatures of approximately TWENTY-EIGHT HUNDRED (2,800) degrees to actually melt, and temperatures approaching 2,000 degrees to turn bright red and soften.

    Got it?
  • ANTI NWO Regulus... 2009/05/03 15:15:40
    ANTI NWO
    +1
    Warned by the FBI, not the CIA. FBI officials were told to back off the Bin Laden trail
  • <--That guy 2007/11/13 22:55:59
    I have seen justifiable evidence of both, but here is what I think...
    <--That guy
    +1
    It was both. Terrorists conspired to hijack commercial airplanes and use them as weapons agaisnt us on our own turf. So it was a conspiracy: a conspiracy made by terrorists who were driven by islamic fundamentalism.

    The U.S. government wasn't in on it though. Not only do I not believe that our government would stoop that low, but I also don't think our government is competent enough to pull it off. We couldn't even get the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections down correctly, especially in 2000. If our government can't even count votes correctly, I wouldn't expect them to pull off such an elaborate scheme as some claim they did.
  • Des <--That... 2007/11/13 23:07:54
    Des
    +2
    You are correct. I suppose I should have titled it "U.S. Governmental conspiracy..."
    Anywho. I think the votes were meant to be a disaster. How else could they get away with it? But I do agree with you on the competency of our government, particularly our president. But out of curiosity, have you seen Loose Change? It explains that the size of the hole in the Pentagon was not even a close match to the diameter of the plane, much less the damage it should have caused. Also, there was no metal shrapnel matching the plane, no physical evidence of the plane at all. That's just one small part of the entire documentary. I'm still undecided myself, but the documentaries certainly raise questions.
  • Cale Des 2008/09/11 22:56:54
    Cale
    Almost everyone who answered B, C and D thinks the official story is incorrect.

    The problem with this survey is that it splits all the people who think the official story is Bull into separate categories debating the details, making it look like we don't add up to almost half of the population.
  • jon Des 2009/07/16 06:29:18
    jon
    "It explains that the size of the hole in the Pentagon was not even a close match to the diameter of the plane"

    Remember they had explosives on the plane. A vest with a bunch of C4 is enough to level a city block if planted correctly. If distributed across the plane properly it would have caused massive damage beyond what was expected. And if it hit a bunch of file cabinets you would have shredded aluminum - not from the plane - twisted beyond recognition hurtling through the building.

    The author of "The Hurt Locker" was with a EOD (Explosive Ordinance Disposal) unit when they blew a car bomb. Shrapnel was traveling fast enough to go *through* a truck a mile away two feet from the author while motor oil splashed next to him on the truck.
  • hybrid ... <--That... 2008/09/13 01:44:03
    hybrid rogue
    +2
    But "not counting the votes correctly" WAS the scheam! They stole the election and got away with it. It is not imcompetence to be able to steal an election, it is extreme unmitigated political power.
    And they got away with 9-11 the same way. Impunity is what it is called, not incompetence
  • BUTCH hybrid ... 2008/09/17 13:32:24
    BUTCH
    +1
    Just think how much money our government has WASTED since this whole 911 incident! You know, the Soviet Union crashed not because the people got sick of communism, but because THAT government too was spending so much on their military and SECURITY that the people almost in total DEMANDED a change because life on a daily basis was getting too hard. Look at what is happening to our ECONOMY. This is a DIRECT result of 911. Planned or not, it has cost, in all the tentacles that have come from it, so much that our government now has an impossible debt and is really insuring everyone that everything is alright. Bush and the Administration are praying that saying that "everything is Ok", will be enough to keep everyone happy.
    But let's put the blame for the WHOLE mess where it lies- BUSH, CHENEY, WOLFEWISCZ (SP??) AND ROVE.
    Obama is right in saying that a REPUBLICAN VIEW OF ECONOMY created this mess. Remember-It was the hero of the Republican's, RONALD REGAN, who brought on the great wave of deregulation and the drastic laizzez faire of world economics. Sure times were good during the Clinton years. People had money because of the deregulation. But over time, if you leave the deregulation go-you have things like the Housing Market collapse and the domino effect to the fin...
    """""""
    """"

    Just think how much money our government has WASTED since this whole 911 incident! You know, the Soviet Union crashed not because the people got sick of communism, but because THAT government too was spending so much on their military and SECURITY that the people almost in total DEMANDED a change because life on a daily basis was getting too hard. Look at what is happening to our ECONOMY. This is a DIRECT result of 911. Planned or not, it has cost, in all the tentacles that have come from it, so much that our government now has an impossible debt and is really insuring everyone that everything is alright. Bush and the Administration are praying that saying that "everything is Ok", will be enough to keep everyone happy.
    But let's put the blame for the WHOLE mess where it lies- BUSH, CHENEY, WOLFEWISCZ (SP??) AND ROVE.
    Obama is right in saying that a REPUBLICAN VIEW OF ECONOMY created this mess. Remember-It was the hero of the Republican's, RONALD REGAN, who brought on the great wave of deregulation and the drastic laizzez faire of world economics. Sure times were good during the Clinton years. People had money because of the deregulation. But over time, if you leave the deregulation go-you have things like the Housing Market collapse and the domino effect to the financial institutions.
    Now we add in the HUGE spending on our military during the Bush terms, the added spending of Homeland Security, the "spending of so called "surplus money" collected from Social Security Taxes and you have a recipe for disaster. Oh, the super wealthy that made money and "got out" in time will be laughing it up on easy street. But now how funny is this to those without a job, without money and no money from our "government" to provide for them.
    All this "government assurance" of the Housing industry(Fannae Mae and Freddy Mac) and now AIG is really "worthless paper"!
    Bush and his buddies need to be tried and convicted and put into POVERTY, with their families, for the rest of their lives. Let the Father and Barbara go to inadequate nursing facilities where they will stay permanently. Let them feel the REAL pain that they have caused by their neglect of our countries well being!
    It is an outrage that we should be here and we should demand accountability!
    (more)
  • LAW BUTCH 2008/11/13 11:58:34
    LAW
    I agree with you, Butch, as well as with John Nichols at "The Nation" weekly who's been calling for impeachment for quite some time. Vincent Bugliosi's recent book, "The Trial of George W. Bush for Murder" has recently spurred Vermont legislators to call for the Constitution's stipulated procedure for handling "high crimes and misdemeanors," IMPEACHMENT!, as well.
  • heavyst... BUTCH 2008/12/10 08:09:07
    heavystarch
    sorry but laizzez faire economics did not cause the housing bubble and subsequent collapse. Fannie/Freddie contributed heavily. Clinton AND Bush both were to blame - they each wanted to "increase home ownership among poor and lower middle class americans" - that reads; get unqualified folks into houses they cannot afford so we can brag about home ownership is at an all time high. Congress deregulated the market. Not the president. Blame congress for that bit of shit. They never should have passed any of that.

    Then the Federal Reserve kept dropping interest rates lower and lower and lower.

    Here you have government coersion and market manipulation that caused the bubble. If the market was truly free then we would not have a Monopoly running the banking system arbitrarily setting interest rates. We also would not have government intervention practically forcing lenders to allow unqualified individuals to take on homes.

    yes there certainly was aspects of greed that can be present in a laizzez faire market that got out of hand. however if the government and monopoly bank (the fed) had not setup the field for this kind of greedy irrational behavior the bubble would not have formed at all.
  • heavyst... <--That... 2008/12/10 08:03:33
    heavystarch
    The whole government was NOT in on it. Only certain key power players with the right influence, control and those who stood to gain the most money/power/control.

    Look at WTC 7 and tell me that terrorists got in there, planted bombs (all around CIA guards and such) and then forgot to hit it with a plane but still managed to turn WTC 7 into dust.
  • ANTI NWO <--That... 2009/05/03 14:58:54
    ANTI NWO
    Those election were staged and our govt is capable of staging these events....they are staging a swine flu epidemic right now, they even staged the Gulf of Tonkin Incident which is why we entered the Vietnam War, and it is now declassified information that the incident never even occurred. Here are 3 topics for you to research and if you do your homework you will wake up to the shadow government that runs things.....1) False Flag Terror Attacks 2) Eugenics 3)Private Federal Reserve

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 18:43:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals