"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto to Ogata Taketora on January 9, 1942.

Posted on: 9:13 am, June 28, 2012, by Richard Holden, updated on: 11:28am, June 28, 2012
(CBS News) In a historic decision, the Supreme Court on Thursday
upheld the critical piece of President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, the
individual mandate.
By upholding the individual mandate, the requirement for all
Americans to acquire health insurance, the court kept what many
described as the “heart” of the law.
The decision creates some certainty surrounding federal health care
policy, allowing federal and state rule makers to, for now, implement
the law.
The decision was 5 – 4, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the liberal justices and writing the majority opinion.
The court ruled that the federal government does have the power to
require all Americans to acquire insurance if the “fine” imposed on
those who don’t is considered a tax.
The court found fault with one major provision of the law, which would have expanded Medicaid coverage.
Currently, Medicaid is a joint federal-state program that provides
health care to certain poor Americans, such as children and the elderly.
In 2014, the Affordable Care Act would have opened up Medicaid to anyone with an income under 138 percent of the federal poverty line.
Several states argued the expansion of the program would have placed
an undue burden on the states, and the court agreed, writing in its
opinion that the provision was like a “gun to the head of the states.”
If a state had chosen not to expand the program as the law required, it
would have had to opt out of Medicaid completely, something no state
could afford to do.
The court ruled that the federal government’s ability to revoke a
state’s Medicaid funding is limited, thus, the states can opt into the
expansion, but they don’t have to.
The high court’s move hardly ends the political controversy
surrounding the law; if anything, the decision to uphold most of the law
is sure to renew calls for lawmakers to repeal the Affordable Care Act
legislatively.
Both President Obama and his Republican rival Mitt Romney are expected to address the court ruling later today.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor in a statement called the court’s
decision a “crushing blow” to patients and promised that the House would
once again vote to repeal the law. “During the week of July 9th, the
House will once again repeal ObamaCare, clearing the way for
patient-centered reforms that lower costs and increase choice,” he said.
In a written statement, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell
said, “Today’s decision makes one thing clear: Congress must act to
repeal this misguided law. Obamacare has not only limited choices and
increased health care costs for American families, it has made it harder
for American businesses to hire.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor, “Our
Supreme Court has spoken. The matter is settled. It’s time for
Republicans to stop fighting yesterday’s battles.”
The ruling inspired emotional responses from both liberals and
conservatives across the country, illustrating how politically explosive
the issue is.
Upon learning the news, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi first
left messages for the president and the vice president, according to a
top Pelosi aide. Then she called Vicki Kennedy, the wife of the late
senator and health care reform champion Ted Kennedy. “Now, Teddy can
rest,” Pelosi told Kennedy.
The Democratic leader — wearing her lucky purple pumps — called her husband after that and then celebrated with her staff.
On the steps of the Supreme Court, before it was clear what the
ruling was, Tea Partiers and other opponents of the law cheered and
waved signs, initially thinking the law was struck down. The cheered,
“Constitution wins!” A few minutes later, after the news was cleared up,
they started chanting, “this is not over,” and “repeal it now.”
Supporters of the health care law, meanwhile, danced in front of the court and shouted, “Yes we can! Yes we can!”
Meka Sales, a public health professional from Charlotte, N.C., told
CBS News that at a meeting of the American Public Health Association
there, people were crying tears of happiness when they heard the news.
“We were totally unprepared for such a favorable decision. I think
tears were on deck for a disappointment but what an incredible
surprise,” she said. “The room was filled with complete joy and a sense
of justice for those that will have access to health care in the future.
“
THIS MEANS IS HIGHER TAXES......Something which Obama 'promised' wouldn't happen on February 24, 2009.......

he probably had soros find the dirt on roberts and threatened exposure.
From "1984", O'Brien talking to Winston Smith in explaining the society that INGSOC is building...
There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a BOOT STAMPING on a human face — forever.
There is more and I think of Obama when I read and re-read it. O'Brien is speaking to Winston...
The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake… We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. Others came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquis...
From "1984", O'Brien talking to Winston Smith in explaining the society that INGSOC is building...
There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a BOOT STAMPING on a human face — forever.
There is more and I think of Obama when I read and re-read it. O'Brien is speaking to Winston...
The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake… We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. Others came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.
-- John Adams, Letter to Thomas Jefferson [November 13, 1815]
The Obamacare decision created what is essentially "unlimited sovereignty" in our federal government.
Let's prevent INGSOC from ever occurring.
The first time I saw Sowell was on a PBS show called "The Advocates". It was a simulated court room scene in which the advocates of certain positions would ask questions of guests on the stand. (William Rusher was the conservative advocate, he was publisher of National Review.) The liberal advocate was trying to push Affirmative Action and asked Sowell if he didn't think that by forcing and increase minority participation in certain fields wouldn't be a good lesson for the U.S. because of the perception of different racial groups in the mainstream.
Sowell replied (paraphrasing) "I think the stock market crash of 1929 was a good lesson but I wouldn't want to go through it every day."
Point well made by an utterly brilliant man.
Question: Could Matthews, Maddow, Olbermann, Schultz, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, etcetera be considered RACIST if they disagreed with Sowell and Williams? I think that would have to be the case since anyone who disagrees with Obummer is a racist.
Thanks for your service also.
A buddy of mine was a cook on the U.S.S. Enterprise. Great ship.
I also heard Jack Lew...WH Chief Of Staff, over the weekend trying to Spin The TAX Word as well...and the Media playing back to Him, ODUMBO's Not A Tax statement on ABC, and The SCOTUS Decision of It Is A TAX....Jack Lew, Just Kept up the Spin...Made Him look More The Fool...
Also this Morning it was indicated that 1/3 of the ObamaCare Tax Increase will affect those making less than $250,000 per year...that Is a Crime..
I am On Part A of Medicare. because I do not want anymore of my SS lowered to pay for Part B....Which means I am Covered for Catistrophic Only....Even Though I have been Paying Into this All these years thru SS Deductions from my Pay....As have you...
She is such a soft-spoken liar, isn't she?
Welcome to Nazi Socialism!
Investors Business Daily
By: Terry Jones
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.
The poll contradicts the claims of not only the White House, but also doctors’ own lobby — the powerful American Medical Association — both of which suggest the medical profession is behind the proposed overhaul.
It also calls into question whether an overhaul is even doable; 72% of the doctors polled disagree with the administration’s claim that the government can cover 47 million more people with better-quality care at lower cost.
The IBD/TIPP Poll was conducted by mail the past two weeks, with 1,376 practicing physicians chosen randomly throughout the country taking part. Responses are still coming in, and doctors’ positions on related topics — including the impact of an overhaul on senior care, medical school applications and drug development — will be covered later in this series.
Two-thirds, or 65%, of doctors say they oppose the proposed government expansion plan. This contradicts the administration’s claims th...
Investors Business Daily
By: Terry Jones
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.
The poll contradicts the claims of not only the White House, but also doctors’ own lobby — the powerful American Medical Association — both of which suggest the medical profession is behind the proposed overhaul.
It also calls into question whether an overhaul is even doable; 72% of the doctors polled disagree with the administration’s claim that the government can cover 47 million more people with better-quality care at lower cost.
The IBD/TIPP Poll was conducted by mail the past two weeks, with 1,376 practicing physicians chosen randomly throughout the country taking part. Responses are still coming in, and doctors’ positions on related topics — including the impact of an overhaul on senior care, medical school applications and drug development — will be covered later in this series.
Two-thirds, or 65%, of doctors say they oppose the proposed government expansion plan. This contradicts the administration’s claims that doctors are part of an “unprecedented coalition” supporting a medical overhaul.
It also differs with findings of a poll released Monday by National Public Radio that suggests a “majority of physicians want public and private insurance options,” and clashes with media reports such as Tuesday’s front-page story in the Los Angeles Times with the headline “Doctors Go For Obama’s Reform.”
Nowhere in the Times story does it say doctors as a whole back the overhaul. It says only that the AMA — the “association representing the nation’s physicians” and what “many still regard as the country’s premier lobbying force” — is “lobbying and advertising to win public support for President Obama’s sweeping plan.”
The AMA, in fact, represents approximately 18% of physicians. . .
And no, the figure of uninsured is 30 million, and the majority of them are young, under 40, and uninsured by choice. What is it hat you believe, that government-enforced health care coverage is free? Tell us this, how can a program that creates a new bureaucracy of 159 boards and commissions actually save money on health care? http://www.saveyourrights.com...
And Obamacare doesn't even touch one of Obama's biggest contributors, and one of the largest drivers of health care costs: Trial Attorneys! Surveys show that between 35% and 40% of diagnostic tests are ordered by doctors as defensive medicine, because they are aftraid of being sued for malpractice. That drives up the cost of health care, and it drives up the overhead for a practicing physician because of the astronomic cost of malpractice i...
And no, the figure of uninsured is 30 million, and the majority of them are young, under 40, and uninsured by choice. What is it hat you believe, that government-enforced health care coverage is free? Tell us this, how can a program that creates a new bureaucracy of 159 boards and commissions actually save money on health care? http://www.saveyourrights.com...
And Obamacare doesn't even touch one of Obama's biggest contributors, and one of the largest drivers of health care costs: Trial Attorneys! Surveys show that between 35% and 40% of diagnostic tests are ordered by doctors as defensive medicine, because they are aftraid of being sued for malpractice. That drives up the cost of health care, and it drives up the overhead for a practicing physician because of the astronomic cost of malpractice insurance.
Just assume Obamacare is fully implemented and we have 30,000,000 more Americans with insurance, and assume that only 10% of the 45% of physicians who say they will leave the practice of medicine actually go through with it - do you even have a clue as to the rationing of medicine, the waiting times for treatment, that will result?
"A bunch of rubber glovers who disregard their Hippocratic Oath and are only in medicine for the money and to have a lucrative practice."
You've shown you true colors with this statement - you believe that men and women who have given up seven years of their lives, plus internships, owe it to you and others to treat you, and that they have no right to their individual aspirations of a "lucrative practice." Good luck with the "best and brightest" wanting to be doctors any more, with a screwed-up federally run system.
You seem to feel the doctors in your family are a group of saints, which I seriously doubt.. Doctors who are ordinary human beings and want the best for themselves and their families look at things quite differently. http://www.nationalcenter.org...
"If ObamaCare passes, you may lose your family doctor. Oh, and good luck finding a new one.
"That's the stunning conclusion of a new study by the Medicus Firm, as reported by Recruiting Physicians Today, a newletter published by the publishers of the New England Journal of Medicine. Medicus, a national physician search firm, surveyed 1,195 practicing physicians about the health reform plans pending in Congress. The doctors, representing a wide range of specialties and career levels, were asked to asses...
You seem to feel the doctors in your family are a group of saints, which I seriously doubt.. Doctors who are ordinary human beings and want the best for themselves and their families look at things quite differently. http://www.nationalcenter.org...
"If ObamaCare passes, you may lose your family doctor. Oh, and good luck finding a new one.
"That's the stunning conclusion of a new study by the Medicus Firm, as reported by Recruiting Physicians Today, a newletter published by the publishers of the New England Journal of Medicine. Medicus, a national physician search firm, surveyed 1,195 practicing physicians about the health reform plans pending in Congress. The doctors, representing a wide range of specialties and career levels, were asked to assess the possible impact of ObamaCare on their careers, including "income, job satisfaction, and future career plans.". . . .
"What many people may not realize is that health reform could impact physician supply in such a way that the quality of health care could suffer. The reality is that there may not be enough doctors to provide quality medical care to the millions of newly insured patients.. . . "
My Dr. will Close His Practice as well as My Sisters Dr. ...
Do the physicians in your family take Medicare patients? If so, do they do so exclusively?
http://www.hrsonline.org/poli...
Congress Passes 10-month “fix” to Medicare Physician Payment Cuts (02/17/2012) On Friday, February 17, Congress passed a 10-month “fix” to the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula, averting the 27 percent cut slated to go into effect on March 1.
***
Eventually, those cuts will come. Will the physicians in your family accept that or be mean and turn them down, our elderly, our most vulnerable, our poor, those without, those that don't mind paying for treatment that they get at a huge discount, if they pay anything at all.
***
http://www.healthreform.gov/r...
Imminent Doctors’ Payment Cut will Limit Access. Because of a flawed system for paying physicians, Medicare is scheduled to reduce its fees next year. This means a 21 percent cut in payments beginning on January 1, 201...
Do the physicians in your family take Medicare patients? If so, do they do so exclusively?
http://www.hrsonline.org/poli...
Congress Passes 10-month “fix” to Medicare Physician Payment Cuts (02/17/2012) On Friday, February 17, Congress passed a 10-month “fix” to the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula, averting the 27 percent cut slated to go into effect on March 1.
***
Eventually, those cuts will come. Will the physicians in your family accept that or be mean and turn them down, our elderly, our most vulnerable, our poor, those without, those that don't mind paying for treatment that they get at a huge discount, if they pay anything at all.
***
http://www.healthreform.gov/r...
Imminent Doctors’ Payment Cut will Limit Access. Because of a flawed system for paying physicians, Medicare is scheduled to reduce its fees next year. This means a 21 percent cut in payments beginning on January 1, 2010.According to a recent survey by the American Medical Association, if Medicare payments are cut by even half that amount – or 10 percent – 60 percent of physicians report that they will reduce the number of new Medicare patients they will treat, and 40 percent will reduce the number of established Medicare patients they treat. In addition, more than two-thirds of physicians will forgo investments in their practice, including the purchase of health information technology.24 This all translates to decreased access to needed services for our nation’s seniors.
***
Happy Going Out Of Business Day to the physicians in your family.
A percentage of your SS Paid Into goes to Medicare Benefits...
When You collect SS, a Percentage is Deducted from your Monthly Payment, for Medicare, if you Chose Part B....which covers Dr. Visits, Meds etc...
Part A....Covers Catestrophic Only.....no Dr. Visits, No Meds...
So Not Free...
BTW, I used to pull Recon in Vietnam in the II Corpse in Binh Din and Pleiku province. Some real Indian Territory out there.
YOU Did Pay for It...with your Service To This Country and The Injuries You Sustained Doing That, While The LIB's Took Off and Demonstrated Against US....
That Area you were in was a Bad area, My Friend...Glad You Made it Back...
I served before VN was Declared....I pulled My Time Along the Mekong River between Laos and Cambodia, before we were Officially There..
Attached to a MACSOG Unit out of Ft Naari in Thailand..Part of the MAAG sent by JFK in '62...Most of My Patrols were LRRP Support and Intel with the Spooks..