SAVAGE: 'Don't believe the big lie of the latest Gallup polls'
|
|
|||||
|
93 votes
|
|
78% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
21 votes
|
|
18% | |||
To me personally it makes a perfect sense: the Gallup polls are not really reliable. Recognize the same 47% spread ?? Please read the M. Savage's article below.
What do you think, guys?
Savage looked back to the
notoriously inaccurate 1980 polls that predicted a solid victory for
Jimmy Carter and explained exactly why, time after time, such polls fail
to reflect what American voters are really thinking.
He reminded listeners that Gallup had Carter up four points against Reagan in September 1980, then added:
For those
of you who are starting to believe the big lie of Gallup (which is a
poll that exists only for the Democrat machine), for those of you who
are losing heart because of the liars in the media, let me reassure you.
Think about
that 1980 Gallup poll, which was just unearthed by Gateway Pundit
blogger Jim Hoft. It had Carter up over Reagan in mid-September, but it
gets even more instructive.
Later, according to Gallup, Carter was up over Reagan by eight points that October!
Then in the final Gallup poll before the election, it showed that Ronald Reagan only had 47% of the vote.
Doesn’t
that sound familiar? Ironically it’s the same figure – “47 percent” –
that the media is now using to spread lies about Romney.
Let’s look back at what happened during the actual 1980 election. Reagan won by 50.8 percent of the vote.
So listen: Reagan ended up winning by nine points and taking 44 states.
The reason
these polls are all wrong is because conservatives usually hang up on
people who call them with a poll question, or they’re never called at
all, or the pollsters load up the survey sample with Democrats and
illegal aliens.
The important thing to remember is: You have to vote and you have to get other people out to vote. Period.
Read More: http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2012/09/savage-do...
Top Opinion
-
texasred 2012/09/23 19:36:14I agree with M. Savage... it all makes sense+14Justice Dept. Gallup lawsuit came after Axelrod criticized pollsters
Internal emails between senior officials at The Gallup Organization, obtained by The Daily Caller, show senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod attempting to subtly intimidate the respected polling firm when its numbers were unfavorable to the president.
After Gallup declined to change its polling methodology, Obama’s Department of Justice hit it with an unrelated lawsuit that appears damning on its face.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/0...
I seriously doubt that Gallup wasn't intimidated. Look what's happened to Gibson Guitars.






















Gallup go to Hell. LOL
Let them show Obama 10 points .. only naive liberals will believe them as they are so damn gullible.
Most are skewed to favor the Incumbent, or the Favored in that State race...
The NBC Poll a week or so ago for Instance...The Ratio's Between DEM, REP and INDEP...Was so Skewed to the DEM Favor...
Many people voted for Obama in 2008 simply because he was the first black candidate in history. Just look back at the testimonials from celebrities during that campaign. They certainly weren't promoting his experience or record of accomplishment -- because there was nothing to speak of. Now that the novelty is a distant memory and reality has set in, how many of them will be back to vote in 2012? Even among those who still claim to be Obama voters, how many will stay home and watch TV on election day?
If the demographics of 2012 are similar to 2008, Obama has a good chance of winning. But if the turnout is more like 2000 or 2004, he's in trouble.
A re-election campaign is the incumbent's race to lose. But if he fails to build up a lead going into the final week, the challenger gets most of the undecided vote. All of the attack ads in the world won't change the fact that undecided voters tend to elect challeng...
Many people voted for Obama in 2008 simply because he was the first black candidate in history. Just look back at the testimonials from celebrities during that campaign. They certainly weren't promoting his experience or record of accomplishment -- because there was nothing to speak of. Now that the novelty is a distant memory and reality has set in, how many of them will be back to vote in 2012? Even among those who still claim to be Obama voters, how many will stay home and watch TV on election day?
If the demographics of 2012 are similar to 2008, Obama has a good chance of winning. But if the turnout is more like 2000 or 2004, he's in trouble.
A re-election campaign is the incumbent's race to lose. But if he fails to build up a lead going into the final week, the challenger gets most of the undecided vote. All of the attack ads in the world won't change the fact that undecided voters tend to elect challengers when the incumbent has not proven his case for a second term. The more attack ads Obama runs on TV, the more obvious his failure to prove the case for a second term.
If I was a sitting President who saw the handwriting on the wall and was simply angry about losing, I would run attack ads ever day and quietly look for a retirement property in Hawaii. Oh, wait... http://beforeitsnews.com/elec...
When you present the facts to them they get real upset and go into deniable chatter..
Wow the person below attacks me then blocks me so that I can't answer!! Coward or what??
Yea praise obama for 43 striate months of 11% or higher REAL UN employment..
Praise him for having the USA's AAA rating DOWNGRADED 3 times...
Praise him for having the middle class LOOSE over $4,000.00 income annually.
Shall I go on little girl ?? Are you ready to deal with FACTS ???
Solendra...ANOTHER epic FAIL..
the GM Volt...FAIL...
Auto bail out will COST taxpayer's 23.77 BILLION.....FAIL
LMAO got any more cute pictures little girl ???
This racist
Democrats are boycotting your commedian
Now who is laughing?
NOW show me PROOF that he is a racist and DO try using facts and not wishful thinking..
Last but not least show me where Obama has lowered the natl. debt.
Show me where the middle class is growing both in numbers and economical strength..
show me where the USA is safer today..
You can not because his every policy has failed to the max..
http://www.facebook.com/Boyco...
well, the left are just slaves of their totalitarian fuehrers - have always been anf probably will always be.
Templer, this a good example - the Reagan-Carter fake polls when Carter was shown way ahead. These polls mean nothing at all.
I went to the link why oh my gosh there is a whole 47 people going to block Mr. Eastwood's next movie.....to funny for words... Now be a good little Obam rodent and go play in traffic, I do hope that you will not breed, the human race needs people with working minds, not slaves..
He may end up being the winner, and will otherwise have a big impact on the outcome.
GOMITT
Even people like Glenn Beck draw parallels between 2012 and 1980, but none of them say the polls are wrong right now, they think Romney is going to make a surge. Mr. Savage seems to just not like facts that don't support his view 100%.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/0...
Sure makes you wonder.
As for current polling, it makes good fodder for the political pundits and for the party zealots. For the rest of us the only poll that counts is the one taken on election day. People who are going to vote or not vote based on current political polls should do us all a favor and stay home.