Question News & Politics

Sarah Palin's 6-Year-Old Daughter Giving The Middle Finger: Can Palin Control The Country When She Can't Even Control Her Kids?

Grace W. Bush October 14, 2008 19:34:02

Sarah Palin's little daughter sticking out the middle finger. You know what that means?? Yes. This Question will hit front page SodaHead in 5...4...3...2...1...

sticking middle finger hit sodahead 5 4 3 2 1

sticking middle finger hit sodahead 5 4 3 2 1
 Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!
No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +46 Bill - McGee - 2012 "I am a... October 15, 2008 03:58:01 (edited)
    Bill - McGee - 2012 "I am a Terrorist "

    Undecided

    neither, that picture's a fake.. just another lame ass attempt by Obama supporters to slam Sarah palin because they are scared to death of the fact that she's a head and shoulders above Obama..



    just think about that for a second.. when your opposition's #2 pick is better than your own #1 pick, wouldn't you be scared too?????



    here's the original picture, not the photoshopped one posted here.



    obama oppositions 2 pick 1 pick scared picture photoshopped posted

    Clearly "2" fingers, not one.....


    and here's the link to the site that shows them both...



    http://www.museumofhoaxes.com...

    good day
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +5
    renee September 26, 2009 23:26:09
    renee

    Undecided

    moderated...
  • +1
    Diomedes April 16, 2009 22:56:08
    Diomedes

    Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!

    I don`t care if she did or not,though if she did,I think it`s funny as Hell,and I hope it was the media she was doing it to ha ha ha.
  • Shylee March 24, 2009 18:38:35
    Shylee

    Undecided

    well as a mother not as a sarah palin fan,we can do it all and so what see flipped the bird,lol,yawl need to leave the kids out of this no matter whos kids they are,personaly i thought it was funny shes a child for god sakes not an adult like this one,peace yawl kids arepersonaly funny shes child god sakes adult onepeace yawl
  • Crazzy January 12, 2009 23:16:17
    Crazzy

    No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.

    that just shows that sara pain uses the finger a lote. which isn't a vary good thing for poitions.
  • +1
    ELROY November 15, 2008 22:48:07
    ELROY

    Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!

    moderated...
  • +1
    Heptarch November 15, 2008 22:07:59
    Heptarch

    No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.

    She should get an education and shed her Fundamentalist trappings too.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 20, 2008 13:44:55
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    ...and perhaps YOU should get an education in how low Obama supporters will go. Start with this FAKE picture. Are you proud of your side?
    I've got a better idea than her "shed(ing) her Fundamentalist trappings". Why don't you try respecting someone's FREEDOM OF RELIGION? I believe that's in the current version of the Constitution. Maybe you should acquaint yourself with that document.
    Schmuck!
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 20, 2008 16:53:54
    Heptarch
    I know it's a fake picture. I was just talking about Palin, not her child.

    I respect her freedom to believe what she wants. She doesn't respect MINE. That's why I say she should shed her Fundie trappings. Because she brings her religion into secular government. THAT'S against the Constitution.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 20, 2008 17:28:21
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    I didn't hear Palin telling anyone to convert. I did see you advising she shed her religion. That doesn't sound too respectful.

    Every POTUS has brought along their religion into office. It's a part of your morality base and one of the things that make you who you are. THAT IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
  • +1 / -1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 20, 2008 19:50:04
    Heptarch
    Some of her policy positions have to do with her religious beliefs. There's no room for that in America. We have a secular government.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 21, 2008 14:15:55
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    I know she's anti-abortion. That's one, not some. Bush is also anti-abortion. SO WHAT?
    As POTUS he had no influence on that. Sarah Palin was running for VP. She would have had even LESS of an effect.
    Should we examine your candidate and the religious teachings that he learned at his church? Do I really need to post Rev. Wright's teachings?
    Get a legitimate point or don't bother replying.
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 21, 2008 17:14:03
    Heptarch
    He had no influence on that? You mean aside from appointing far-right justices for the Supreme Court, the only way that Roe v. Wade can be overturned?
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 21, 2008 18:12:18
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    ..and yet they didn't did they? Hmmm?
    Could the fact that 60% of Americans favor abortion have an effect? How about the fact that they have no legal cause to overturn it in the first place?
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 21, 2008 18:38:50
    Heptarch
    Nope, not yet. I imagine the radical right is pretty upset with them over that.

    So far so good, though.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 21, 2008 20:32:54
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    so then it's a non-issue isn't it? Why bring it up? Oh wait. I forgot. Despite the fact that Roe v Wade is not in danger it is a rallying cry for all you to use against the right.
    Any other non-issues you wish to talk about?
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 21, 2008 20:41:40 (edited)
    Heptarch
    All I said was that he had influence in the only thing that could potentially change the country's legal position on abortion. The radical right has been agitating for the Supreme Court to reverse Roe v. Wade. It's not as if Bush didn't put the pieces into place. Thankfully the justices have acted appropriately.

    Roe v. Wade IS in danger as long as the Supreme Court is mainly composed of far right justices. Is it in IMMINENT danger? Nah, probably not. But that could change any time.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 24, 2008 14:19:12
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    I do not believe that Roe v Wade will be overturned regardless of who sits on the bench. Past experience shows that the Justices have often put politics aside and attempted to be sound and just. Did they not judge against Bush with regard to Gitmo? They know that Presidents come and go but their position is for life and act accordingly.
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 24, 2008 14:46:23
    Heptarch
    The point isn't whether they will, really, but that they might, based on their personal politics.

    I agree with you that the judges, historically, act appropriately. Further, they tend to be loathe to overturn their own decisions.

    I just get a little jittery when the Court isn't purple.
  • fuzzy K... Heptarch November 24, 2008 15:29:09
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    Anything's possible, I guess.
    Personally, I am pro-choice but feel that it is really a State issue just like Gay marriage rather than a Federal one.
    In cases of rape or incest or if the mother's health is at risk then it should be strictly a medical decision between the woman and her doctor. No government intervention at all.
    When it comes to voluntary abortion, the citizens of each state should vote on it and fund appropriately.
  • +1
    Heptarch fuzzy K... November 24, 2008 15:32:43
    Heptarch
    I don't know... on the surface that sounds fair, but then you'd have states like Alabama or Utah that would essentially enact draconian abortion law.
  • +1
    MeanGene November 14, 2008 17:49:20
    MeanGene

    Undecided

    I know this poll is old and all, but it's a fake picture.
  • +1
    betz November 14, 2008 16:33:26 (edited)
    betz

    Undecided

    This is a touched up picture. The child is absolutely adorable and has been raised in a lovely family with good values. By the way....I love Sarah's coat. She has such class. If John McCain had won ( :( ) Sarah Palin and Cindy MCain would never have worn a black dress with what looked like blood or ketchup all over the front of it!!!!! Did any of you see Obama's wife's dress????
  • +1
    Arel November 14, 2008 16:06:36
    Arel

    Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!

    Give me a break. No one can control their childrens every move and I would say that was photo shopped. Sarah Palin has come under more attack than anyone and it is a slap in the face to all working mothers. Women should be furious about what has happened during this election from Hillary to Sarah.
  • +1
    Ladydi November 12, 2008 20:58:05
    Ladydi

    Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!

    count on an Obama fan to doctor a picture, of all things, a child.. to dishonestly make the other candidates supposedly look worse. Birds of a feather...and even if the child were doing so, It has nothing to do with the qualifications of her mother to be a V.P. or even President. As far as I'm concerned, Bush wasn't any more qualified but was voted into office not once but twice.. I'd rather have her, a true American, who has a valid birth certificate, no ties to mobsters, muslim radicals, Russian socialist radicals, and a family preacher that was put in front of his children spouting racial hatred and Anti-American views as a role model , like Obama.
  • deana November 06, 2008 22:03:48 (edited)
    deana

    Undecided

    palin isn't qualified, but that's not why. even kids with the best parents do things like that sometimes. you can't keep your kids from being influenced by society.


    but that is really funny.










    and the pic with 2 fingers looks like the photoshopped one. look at her face. she looks pissed. i don't think she would have been making a peace sign
  • +1
    mac -Ho... deana November 14, 2008 15:10:46
    mac -Holding Fast


    No, this high res shot shows no sign of tampering. If you can find an equal or higher resolution photo with the middle finger, you might be able to make a case.

    (BTW, the old woman over the boy looks unconcerned for the manner in which they have been conversing. And Piper is holding a Target bag. Toys? I posit she is telling the boy how many toys or snacks she has in the bag to share. Her face looks like it's concentrating, not pissed.)
  • +1
    mac -Ho... deana November 14, 2008 15:11:26
    mac -Holding Fast
    If Piper is pissed, the girl next to the sax is about 2 seconds away from declaring Jihad.
  • fuzzy K... deana November 20, 2008 13:52:24
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    Dumb, dumb, dumb.
    Go to Alaska's website to see the original pic. http://gov.state.ak.us/large_...

    This info has only been posted on this poll a few dozen times.

    website pic httpgov ak uslarge info posted poll dozen times
  • AnnForT... fuzzy K... November 20, 2008 18:42:36
    AnnForTruth
    Can you say with certainty the picture retrieved from the link provided showing her sticking up two fingers is the original one? Because judging from her facial expression, she wasn't holding up a peace sign. Even if it is the original picture, she look more like she intended to use the middle finger only, but perhaps didn't know you use one finger instead of two. Whatever the case may be this is an old issue and who wants to talk about the Palin bunch any longer? They are in Alaska and where Sarah Palin should have remained from the beginning.
  • fuzzy K... AnnForT... November 20, 2008 18:56:24
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    With certainty? Yes. If the two finger photo is the fake then why use it on the sate website at all. It was one of many posted from the event.
    Maybe she was doing her impersonation of Obama. LOL

    finger photo fake sate website posted event impersonation obama lol
  • +1
    AnnForT... fuzzy K... November 27, 2008 16:33:36
    AnnForTruth
    In that case, ENJOY YOUR DAY!
  • Chocolate Barbie November 06, 2008 01:31:05
    Chocolate Barbie

    Undecided

    Sarah Palin was never fit to be a damn vice president so her daughter behaving like that just proves the point!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • fuzzy K... Chocola... November 20, 2008 13:54:35
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    ...and YOUR POST proves that you're a moron.
    (apologies to those who are mentally challenged due to birth defects or accidents)
  • MandyRN November 05, 2008 01:12:53
    MandyRN

    Yes. Sarah Palin can run the country. In today's world, kids do the darnest things!

    I think that is freaking funny. I think she has all the right to stick that little finger up. you didn't hear what the little boy said. He probly told her some lie about change or how he is going to give her some money she doesn't deserver... I don't know. I don't think that her knowing some American Sign Language is all that bad. Atleast she is bilingual....
  • laffy taffy November 04, 2008 22:17:43
    laffy taffy

    Undecided

    Well whether you believe it or not it looks like a middle finger to me and what you see is sometimes what you get these days
  • +1
    Zurahgak November 02, 2008 06:05:57
    Zurahgak

    No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.

    From her pregnant teen, to this little girl? Are you kidding me? I don't think Palin is even qualified to be a mother!
  • MandyRN Zurahgak November 05, 2008 01:17:32
    MandyRN
    No one is perfect, and honestly i can't judger her on the fact that her teenage daughter is pregnant. It happens the the best of them. My mom was pregnant at 17, my sister at 18, my brother had a child at 17. The funny thing is that I am 21 married and without a child. I think it is funny how now that have made my own way and am not in poverty, and that they never made a way, under Obama, they deserve my money that I make... I don't think so.
  • +1
    betz Zurahgak November 14, 2008 16:36:30
    betz
    Of course she's qualified to be a mother. ARe you a psychologist? Somehow I'm hoping if you have a daughter she comes home pregnant. LOL
  • +1
    Tam October 31, 2008 13:29:58
    Tam

    No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.

    That picture is exactly what it is...look at her facial expression to match!Hmm had this been Obama's kids would have been ALL over FOX News
  • +1
    deb October 28, 2008 18:40:39
    deb

    No. Sarah Palin should raise her kids first before stepping into office.

    Let's see Track may or may not have shoplifted liquor and vandalized buses however he for sure hangs out with boys who do. Bristol did not feel the need to have protected sex as a teenager. And then little Piper who has an attitude in every family photo and has not problem flipping off another child in public...I wonder what she does when no one is looking. Oh! my gosh! are these kids crying out for attention or what. Let's see that leaves two and one of them is a baby. I know our economy can sure support secret service agents for 5 children as well as nannies and all the extra things that precious
    baby needs. From the looks of it the kids would be better off if she was elected because than at least they might have nannies that will give them the love they are missing.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 78 Next » Last »
Hot on SodaHead

More Community More Originals

or
Cancel