San Francisco May Ban Public Nudity: About Time?
Fef
2012/11/19 06:15:21
|
|
|||||
|
275 votes
|
|
58% | |||
|
200 votes
|
|
42% | |||
Nudists in San Francisco may have strutted their stuff a bit too much. Now San Francisco lawmakers will consider a law against public nudity.
McCray Winpsett said, "A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us. It's my time to come out now to present myself in a light and show what true nudity is all about so people can separate the difference between what a nudist is and an exhibitionist is." Winpsett said he disagrees with the law because the nudist tradition "keeps San Francisco weird."

McCray Winpsett said, "A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us. It's my time to come out now to present myself in a light and show what true nudity is all about so people can separate the difference between what a nudist is and an exhibitionist is." Winpsett said he disagrees with the law because the nudist tradition "keeps San Francisco weird."

Read More: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NUDITY_B...
Top Opinion
-
Liz 2012/11/20 03:40:43Ban Nudity




















Bet ya we'll find people complained about them strolling around , so some equal rights organization , made an issue about women being allowed & men not allowed ,... so no one can do it anymore .
Thanx guys .
On any other basis, I could care less about how you view clothes. For one thing, you were designed to be naked - even the Bible recognized this, when it described Adam and Eve fashioning clothes for themselves after eating the apple. For another, nudity =/= sex crimes, or you'd be charged with one every time you stripped down to take a shower. For a third thing, a good portion of work from the Renaissance and ancient times focuses on the human form without clothes on, and I doubt you approve censoring huge portions of the human race's past.
will have nightmare for the rest of my life
And you do realize pedophiles already attack in places where clothes are mandated, like schools and on the street and so forth... right? Clothes aren't the same thing as armor.
Besides, why should we not do something just because it's extremely difficult? I could argue that we shouldn't have police forces because hunting fugitives down is difficult, but the benefits of having police forces outweighs the drawbacks.