RUSSIA TO AMERICA - YOUR MEDIA IS PROPAGANDA, YOUR PRESIDENT IS A FRAUD, AND YOUR CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN GUTTED
Annette
2012/04/03 03:07:42
Pravda asks: What happened to American media?
Accuses U.S. press of 'deliberately hiding evidence' of Obama's 'fraud'
"The American Press is protecting the President, pushing the
fraud upon both America and the world, supporting a man who may well
have usurped the office.”
It’s a twist of irony: The Russian news website Pravda has published an accusation that the American
media is “tame,” afraid to publish news and is “deliberately hiding
the evidence published on the internet about [President Obama's]
defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of
the Constitution of the United States.”
In a March 7 Pravda column, “Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential
qualifications forged,” Dianna Cotter, a senior at American Military
University, blasts America’s mainstream media for their virtual silence about Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s six-month investigation into the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate and his constitutional eligibility for office.
Read the rest of the article here:
http://www.alipac.us/content/pravda-asks-what-happened-americ...
It is a pretty sad state of affairs when our own press needs to be called out for suppressing what is potentially the biggest scandal to have ever touched the office of president in 236 years. What are they all so afraid of? The news media? The House and Senate? The military? What are they so afraid of that it has caused all of them to remain completely mum on the subject of the usurper's unanswered questions? Mum on the forgeries found on many of the documents put forth by the White House as valid proof of his eligibility? What is the real problem behind the silence???
Accuses U.S. press of 'deliberately hiding evidence' of Obama's 'fraud'
"The American Press is protecting the President, pushing the
fraud upon both America and the world, supporting a man who may well
have usurped the office.”
It’s a twist of irony: The Russian news website Pravda has published an accusation that the American
media is “tame,” afraid to publish news and is “deliberately hiding
the evidence published on the internet about [President Obama's]
defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of
the Constitution of the United States.”
In a March 7 Pravda column, “Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential
qualifications forged,” Dianna Cotter, a senior at American Military
University, blasts America’s mainstream media for their virtual silence about Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s six-month investigation into the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate and his constitutional eligibility for office.
Read the rest of the article here:
http://www.alipac.us/content/pravda-asks-what-happened-americ...
It is a pretty sad state of affairs when our own press needs to be called out for suppressing what is potentially the biggest scandal to have ever touched the office of president in 236 years. What are they all so afraid of? The news media? The House and Senate? The military? What are they so afraid of that it has caused all of them to remain completely mum on the subject of the usurper's unanswered questions? Mum on the forgeries found on many of the documents put forth by the White House as valid proof of his eligibility? What is the real problem behind the silence???
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form and combination of education with industrial production.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?... (You only have to watch half of it to hear them say he was born there and call him a "son of their soil".
And this link is to Lord Monckton. http://obamareleaseyourrecord...
Well now here is a publication Pravda (not to mention Voice of Russia and a few other not-so-right-wing publications around Europe) that you can't exactly call right-wing, running with this story. Hilarious.
But, I already know how the reaction will be... "State run media!!! It's a smear campaign!!! It's a plot by the evil Russian government!!!" Which again, is hilariously ironic. This issue might even bring back the Red Scare with liberals. Can you imagine that? "Have you now or ever been a member of the Russian communist party?" "No... I'm a member of the American one." "Uh... you're good to go."
This should be a prime time special. "When half-baked demagogic ideologies collide!!! Putin vs. Obama! In a no brain cells barred babbling match!"
Hilarious.
Just out of curiosity, according to conservatives, when exactly did Pravda stop publishing propaganda and start publishing "the truth"?
I do find it quite ironic that Pravda would claim that US media is propaganda, US President is a fraud, and US Constitution to be gutted and not mention how it compares with Russian media, president, and state of Russian Constitution. Guess Putin keeps Pravda on pretty tight leash.
The article kind of reminds me of a Russian joke that Reagan told,
It sounds like you've never even read any Russian sources and are completely ignorant in what light US is presented in them. And if you think that Reagan would side with Pravda and its propaganda or with a corrupt authoritarian like Putin against US you are simply deluding yourself. And if that's who your priorities tell you to serve then it seems to me you are in the wrong country.
So far all you've demonstrated is that you are consumed with hatred for Obama. That is your personal issue that has nothing to do with me. What concerns Reagan he wasn't consumed with hatred the way you are even towards murderous dictators like Saddam, so it seems he wouldn't share in your hatred of Obama.
I'm not the topic of the discussion, nor do I suck up to others the way you are doing to Reagan or Pravda, because you believe that Reagan would be siding with it. I see no difference between corruption of Reagan and Obama administrations.
What concerns your paranoid fantasies about US being turned into Cold War East Germany so far you've brought zero evidence to support them from your alternate reality. Though if you are really worried about it, why not check out your newly trusted propaganda-free source of news called Pravda on what it had to say on the topic?
--William Shakespeare
I sincerely hope that you'll find peace of mind sooner rather than later. Hate and fear aren't conducive to rational thought and those who are gripped by either of the negative emotions are easily susceptible to propaganda, which exploits the sentiments.
Have a nice day.
So why don't you go play with your little friends and leave grown-up conversations to the grown-ups.
Guess Elbert Hubbard had someone like you in mind when he said,
"If you can't answer a man's arguments, all is not lost; you can still call him vile names."
Neither Annette, nor Evan, nor you have so much as attempted to answer the questions. If it wasn't clear, I wasn't soliciting replies from individuals whose idea of argument is dodging questions and name-calling.
I don't particularly care whether you or anyone else considers me important. And considering your sole contribution to the discussion has been making personal attacks on me I don't really understand why you think that anyone would view that in positive light. Though since you are so eager to spend a few moments of your time insulting me, I'll leave you to it.
Have a nice day.
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.
Here is a model separation agreement:
--Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
--We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them.
--You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.--Since you hate guns and we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military.
--We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar ...
Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.
Here is a model separation agreement:
--Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy! Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.
--We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them.
--You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.--Since you hate guns and we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA and the military.
--We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar and biodiesel.
--You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them.
--We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street.
--You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers, food stamps, homeless, homeboys, hippies, druggies and illegal aliens.
--We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks.
--We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood
--You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.
--You can have the peaceniks and war protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security.
--We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.
--You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. but we will no longer be paying the bill.
--We'll keep the SUV's, pickup trucks and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Volt and Leaf you can find.
--You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors.
--We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right.--We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem."
--I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya" or "We Are the World".
--We'll practice trickle-down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot.
--Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our flag.
ne talk show caller speculated Obama's birth certificate might list him as "white" as his mother was and that wouldn't go well in the black community.
It turns out that the stalling on the birth certificate was likely a red herring, to keep opposition distracted from the real issue, that Obama is ineligible because he is not "natural born" as defined in SCOTUS case Minor V. Happersette 1874.
"The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
One lawyer claims he has used thewayback.com to prove Justica.com, a major paid legal referrence service had deliberately delted all referrence to "Minor" months before the 2008 election.
http://naturalborncitizen.wor...
Yup, Barry's use of the media as tools certainly isn't new.... it’s just TODAY.
But it is the first time such blatant violation of our Constitution is ignored by those who are vested with the responsibility to be America's watchdogs.