Quantcast

"Russia is our number one foe" claims Romney. Should we be rightfully concerned?

flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 01:57:57

Mitt Romney cannot possibly be serious. To call Russia “our
number one foe”
this week was a step back in time. But that’s one time
machine Russian leadership doesn’t want to travel in.


People in their 30s and early 40s probably remember Flavor Flav from the rap
group Public Enemy. He wore a clock around his neck because he knew what time it
was. Someone has to get the former Massachusetts governor one of those.


Romney told Wolf Blitzer on Monday that, “Russia, this is, without question,
our number one geopolitical foe. They fight every cause for the world’s worst
actors.”


Romney was referring to the fact that Russia has been against U.N. sanctions
on Libya, Iran, and Syria. And joined with China (and others) against the war in
Iraq.


But to say Russia was America’s biggest geopolitical foe was a stretch. And
not how Washington sees it. On Monday, President Barack Obama met with Russian
president Dmitry Medvedev at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, who said that
the two countries have never been closer.


So after hearing Romney’s comment, Medvedev said from Seoul, “This ‘number
one foe’ type of phrase smacks of Hollywood.” Then he issued a warning to
Washington White House contenders: “I would advise all pretenders to the U.S.
presidency…to use their heads. This is not a bad thing for a presidential
candidate.”


Romney was trying to appear like a real opposition candidate to Obama, who
said Monday that he could be more flexible after the elections with regards to a
NATO missile defense near the Russian border. Russia is against the proposal.
Romney called out Obama for appearing weak. Because apparently flexibility is a
sign of weakness for some right-thinking politicians.


“The idea that he has more flexibility in mind for Russia is very, very
troubling indeed,” Romney said on CNN.


But Medvedev, who steps down after four years in the Kremlin in early May,
told Romney to check the time.


“It’s 2012, not the middle of the 1970s,” he said. “Pay attention to
political realities.”

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • oldlady 2012/05/22 14:03:58
    oldlady
    He's using the "good ol' boy" fear tactic now because he's desperate to win the Presidency. It worked for Bush as it has all republicans in the past. I'd like to think that America has grown up enough by now and can see through the dark veil and vote accordingly.
     FEAR 5 cents
  • robbt1 2012/05/22 06:26:09
    robbt1
    +1
    Russia, a bigger threat than China? Oh Romney... you so silly.
  • JCD aka "biz" 2012/05/22 05:16:13
    JCD aka "biz"
    +1
    This is ridiculous.
  • Prime Time Lime 2012/05/22 04:56:36 (edited)
    Prime Time Lime
    +1
    I still remember of the delusion of a commie under every bed and every closet when a child.Nothing happened then.
  • John Galt jr or Ron/jon 2012/05/22 04:19:06
    John Galt jr or Ron/jon
    +1
    If they are our number one foe, we don't need a military anymore
  • flaca BN-0 John Ga... 2012/05/22 04:25:11
    flaca BN-0
    pls expand
  • Rebel Yell 2012/05/22 03:41:44
    Rebel Yell
    +1
    Who can take anything Bain in the Butt says? First , he created hundreds of thousands of jobs. Then it was tens of thousands. Now it is thousands. Willard was no job creator. He was a job executioner, one of the worst.

    What else does he have. Okay, we'll give him the Olympics he talks non stop about, although he had lots of help. He was a one term governor. We know how that played out. The best thing he came up with was Romneycare , now Obamacare, which he now seems to have memory lapses about how well it was received.

    Foreign policy? Sure. He knows how to hide money in the Caymens. Romney knows something after all. But Russia? Bar Har Har Har Har!
  • flaca BN-0 Rebel Yell 2012/05/22 03:58:26
    flaca BN-0
    Romney was only a one term governor? WOW. I love it.... gonna think about that.
    Thanks................ LOL
  • David Lindner 2012/05/22 03:38:22
    David Lindner
    I agree to an extent, Russia is our number one geopolitical enemy for sure.
  • flaca BN-0 David L... 2012/05/22 04:00:11
    flaca BN-0
    OK bt what do you base that on? Have you been to Russia. Do you know many Russians?
    Can you speak any Russian? Is you whole understanding of Russians based upon American media, or something wider?
  • David L... flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 04:23:55
    David Lindner
    hmm that's a common sense question.
  • john Kills 2012/05/22 03:11:04
    john Kills
    +1
    As a patriotic American, I feel our own government is the largest threat to liberty and freedom.
  • Disko Pickle 2012/05/22 02:42:21 (edited)
    Disko Pickle
    +6
    That's funny. I could have sworn that the GOP's #1 foe was the United States of America.
  • Schläue~© 2012/05/22 02:37:56 (edited)
    Schläue~©
    And he would be 100% correct. Our number one geopolitical foe

    Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and Muslim terrorists are just that .... terrorists.
    Iran, N Korea, Syria, Yemen..... all of which we could squash like a bug if need be.

    The only formidable foes we have on the planet are China and Russia.
    China hasn't been involved in a war for quite a while and has no intention of taking aggression against us. They need us to keep Russia in check and vice versa.

    Russia, has been leading 0bozo around like he's got a ring through his nose.

    They're on the rebound and Putin has never left power no matter what people think about Medvedev.
    He's Putin's puppet and you'll notice who showed up at Camp David because Putin doesn't give a sh!t about what 0bozo thinks.

    He knows his real background and has him by the balls. Oops.... I meant raisins.
  • flaca BN-0 Schläue~© 2012/05/22 02:40:03
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    please give examples of why Russia is out number one foe? Whether Putin is in control or not, please show how Russia is out number one foe. Thank you. (btw have you ever been to Russia?)
  • Schläue~© flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 02:54:39
    Schläue~©
    Many times. Ukraine as well... before and after the fall of the Soviet Union.

    Russia (Putin) dictated to 0bozo that we would cancel our missile defense system that was planned to be based in Poland and the Czech Republic. What did Russia give up in return? ZILCH.

    Their entire defense system is mobile, and all they had to do is roll the vehicles away from the borders while the cameras were filming and bring them back after the press went home.

    Putin is still pissed about the 10 year Afghan war that we supplied the weapons and training against them, per the directive Carter signed in 1979.
    He even got more pissed when Reagan effectively ended the cold war and the wall came down in Berlin.

    Shortly afterward, the USSR crumbled and Putin has been biding his chance to rise to the top no matter what the cost. Although he wasn't their leader at the time, he's a very bitter and ruthless man and despises that his country was embarrassed on the world-wide arena.

    The smaller rogue nations can cause us many headaches.... Russia could match us blow for blow in an all out global war.
  • flaca BN-0 Schläue~© 2012/05/22 03:20:39
    flaca BN-0
    but what has Putin done against the US in recent years?
  • Schläue~© flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 12:53:22
    Schläue~©
    He hasn't 'done' anything because Russia is in a rebuilding phase.
    I'm not saying they're going to fire on the U.S. but Putin would like nothing more than to regain control of the 'territories' who split off from the USSR and remake the region, especially taking Georgia, the gateway to Turkey and the Mediterranean Sea.
  • flaca BN-0 Schläue~© 2012/05/22 03:33:28
    flaca BN-0
    the deployment of nuclear weapons was mirrored. Russia downgraded their old and defunct weapons ad did we. Can you prove otherwise please. You make claims, but the reporting from the Beeb is different from what you claim.
  • Schläue~© flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 13:00:40
    Schläue~©
    Of course there aren't any Internet links that speak of this. It's true that both the U.S. and Russia decommissioned some of the old toys because those were not compatible with advanced delivery systems, considered obsolete but don't think for a moment that the warheads were just tossed in the trash.
    That material is still quite usable and the whole charade was nothing more than propaganda.

    There are enough nukes around the world to end it as we know it 20 X over so the number of weapons is really not a factor..... who gets hold of the material and has no qualms about using it is a HUGE problem.

    I like Putin.... not his politics but one has to admit.... he has balls and sticks to his convictions.
  • ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2012/05/22 02:31:38
    ὤTṻnde΄ӂ
    +3
    The only thing we should be concerned about is Willard getting elected.
  • john Kills ὤTṻnde΄ӂ 2012/05/22 03:14:15
    john Kills
    Tell me about it. The only thing that would be just a little bit worse would be barry getting re-elected.
  • flaca BN-0 john Kills 2012/05/22 03:22:21
    flaca BN-0
    +2
    why? has the unemployed rate gone down or up? Are gas prices $5 a gallon?
    Is the financial system collapsed or making money? Has Obama made anything worse by legislation? If so, pls cite legislation and widespread effects. Thank you.
  • john Kills flaca BN-0 2012/05/22 03:32:18
    john Kills
    You are purposely refusing to accept facts so I won't even bother to debate you. You are definitely in a fantasy world that is going to come tumbling down around you.
  • Gloria 2012/05/22 01:59:40
    Gloria
    +2
    Really?
    we will bury your children
    When he wakes up I hope the voting public has woken up.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 23:41:44

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals