As we have all heard by now Rush Limbaugh has issued an "apology" to Sandra Fluke for calling her a "slut" and a "prostitute". It isn't surprising that the basic translation of this "apology" works out to "I have to say something because the sponsors are crawling up my butt, so I'm sorry I used the words "slut" and "prostitute" even though that's what you are." What he glosses over and fails to mention is the ENTIRE WEEK he spent glorifying in what he said in a constant diatribe in which he attacked and insulted her and the women of Georgetown University no less than 46 times. This, however comes as no shock considering his long history of hostile and misogynistic remarks concerning women.
Rush Limbaugh's recent barrage of sexist attacks on Sandra Fluke are being described as a "new low" for the radio host, which is a remarkable feat given Limbaugh's decades-long resume of misogynistic smears and attacks on women. http://mediamatters.org/blog/201203010012 , http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/101308/rush-limbaugh-ca...
To provide a proper understanding of just how far Limbaugh has sunk, here's a worst-of list of sexist attacks from the man who recently defined "misogynist" as "a man who hates women almost as much as women hate women." http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203020012
13-Year-Old Chelsea Clinton As The "White House Dog." As reported by the late columnist Molly Ivins, during an episode of his television show in the early years of the Clinton administration, Limbaugh "put up a picture of Socks, the White House cat, and asked, 'Did you know there's a White House dog?' Then he put up a picture of Chelsea Clinton, who was 13 years old at the time and as far as I know had never done any harm to anyone."
Ivins added:
When viewers objected, he claimed, in typical Limbaugh fashion, that the gag was an accident and that without his permission some technician had put up the picture of Chelsea--which I found as disgusting as his original attempt at humor. http://motherjones.com/politics/1995/05/lyin-bully
The "Testicle Lockbox." One of Limbaugh's (many) running attacks on Hillary Clinton is that she is in possession of a "testicle lockbox" that represents, in Limbaugh's retelling, "the worst characteristics of women ... totally controlling, not soft and cuddly. Not sympathetic. Not patient. Not understanding. Demanding, domineering, Nurse Ratched kind of thing." He boasts of having invented the concept, and deploys it whenever he perceives weakness by men (Clinton need not have any connection to the story). http://mediamatters.org/research/200802150004 , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910090036
Are Cain's Accusers Appearing Together Because "They Want To Synchronize Their Menstrual Periods?" During a November 2011 discussion of sexual harassment allegations against Herman Cain, Limbaugh wondered: "I did ask yesterday, what's the big deal with the panel here? Do they want to synchronize their menstrual periods? Why appear together? What, does it give added weight?" http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201111100010
Presidential Limo "Weighs Eight Tons Without" Michelle Obama. Michelle Obama's nationwide anti-obesity campaign has rankled Limbaugh and other conservatives, who have responded to the fitness drive with a barrage of nonsensical attacks on Mrs. Obama's weight -- Limbaugh is fond of referringto the First Lady as "Michelle, my butt," and has said"it doesn't look like Michelle Obama follows her own nutritionary, dietary advice." Last September, commenting on the size of the presidential limousine, Rush said: "The beast weighs eight tons without Michelle in it. Eight tons. Sixteen thousand pounds." http://mediamatters.org/blog/201102140015 , http://mediamatters.org/research/201012140031 , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201102210011
"Translating" Obama Statement On Clinton: "I Don't Know Why The B-I-Itch Is Staying In."On his March 31, 2008, show, Limbaugh discussed comments by then-candidate Barack Obama that "Senator Clinton can run as long as she wants." Limbaugh responded:
LIMBAUGH: Can I translate that for you? "I don't know why the B-I-itch is staying in. I feel like a damn hostage here. But I can't say it because she's a woman. And if I say that, they're going to jump down in my throat for being a sexist." http://mediamatters.org/research/200803310010
Feminism "Was Established To Allow Unattractive Women Easier Access To The Mainstream." Anyone who has listened to enough Rush Limbaugh knows that he holds feminism in low regard and will often refer to feminists as "feminazis," a term he proudly takes ownership of. Last June, in trying to explain attacks on Sarah Palin, Limbaugh declared that feminism "was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream." He elaborated, saying the "feminazis" were "trying to reorder human nature because of how unkind it was to them." http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202070009 , http://mediamatters.org/research/200506240002
Women Think, "Cheat On Me, Just Don't Tell Me About It." In March 2009, Limbaugh discussed a poll showing support for President Obama despite respondents saying Obama is likely to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000. Limbaugh commented: "They know [Obama is] lying through his teeth and they still support him. It just means this: what women have always known, 'cheat on me, just don't tell me about it.' " http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200903260024
The following day, Limbaugh told listeners: "[W]hile my closing comment yesterday was certainly a comment containing a large element of truth, it still perhaps was inappropriate and so for that, I apologize." http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200903270013
"Everybody Knows It Was The Vacuum Cleaner That Liberated Women More Than The Pill." In March 2009, Limbaugh discussed a claim that the washing machine was "more liberating [to women] than the pill":
LIMBAUGH: This continual playing to stereotypes must stop. It must be challenged, and it must be swept aside. Women face enough tough decisions each and every day particularly during this recession. We all know that during economic downturns women and minorities are hardest hit, and it's no different now. And in this time of economic challenge, downturn, hopelessness, where is the next car coming from, the next job for the husband? The husband! Where is the husband coming in? Where is the next man coming? To sit here and pretend that you are a comedian and to say that the washing machine was more liberating than the pill according to the Catholic church, this has gone far enough. Besides, everybody knows it was the vacuum cleaner that liberated women more than the pill. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200903090019 , http://webtest1.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030909/conte...
Accidentally Attacking A (Male) Journalist As A "Stupid Babe." In Limbaugh's world, the media are under constant threat of "chickification" and women journalists are not news professionals, but rather "info babes." Limbaugh's ardor for sexist attacks on female reporters has backfired on him, however, like when he (wrongly) assumed that reporter Sasha Abramsky was a woman and attackedthe decidedly un-female journalist for his analysis of Obama's political style, saying: "This is what this stupid babe at Salon believes. This is what she wants! Sorry, 'stupid.' Take it back. Ignorant, hopeful, uninformed -- this is what she thinks! This is what she wants!" http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201109280017 , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202080011 , http://mediamatters.org/blog/201011150020 , http://www.salon.com/2010/11/14/obama_good_government_abramsk...
NOW Are "A Bunch Of Whores To Liberalism." Limbaugh often channels his disdain for feminists and feminism into attacks on the National Organization For Women, which he has charmingly renamed "NAGS, the national association of gals." In October 2010, Limbaughdeclaredthat the "the NAGS are a bunch of whores to liberalism, and that they are not faithful to women, and they never have been about women's issues." http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910010032 , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201010140029
Attacking Danica Patrick's Statement On Contraceptive Coverage "What Do You Expect From A Woman Driver?" Late last month, professional auto racer Danica Patrick was asked her opinion of the Obama administration's mandate that employers provide health plans that cover contraceptive care. Patrick responded: "I leave it up to the government to make good decisions for Americans." Limbaugh attackedPatrick, saying that her answer "sums up the Democrat mindset perfectly," adding: "What do you expect from a woman driver?" http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/21/danica-patrick-on-contracep... , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201202270006
Justices Kagan And Sotomayor Discuss "Life Experience" Because "They're Women -- That Means They're Victims." Limbaugh, as one would expect, opposed the nominations of both Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Rush said that both were "not qualified," adding: "The whole point of talking about life experiences -- who are we talking about here? Sotomayor and Kagan. What are they? They're women -- that means they're victims. That means they're minorities. That means they've been discriminated against. That means we owe them!" http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201007220045
"There Are Plenty Of Lard-Ass Women In Politics, And They Get A Total Pass On It." During an October 2011 discussion of politicians' weight, Limbaughsaidthat female politicians "get a pass on every aspect of their appearance":
LIMBAUGH: Let me just tell you point-blank, folks, I don't care what Ruth Marcus said, the truth and the fact of the matter is that female politicians get a pass on every aspect of their appearance. You would never have stories about how some female politician is fat like there are stories about Christie being fat. You wouldn't have those stories. When's the last time you saw a story on Barney Frank being fat? When's the last time you saw -- well, it fits, it still fits. When is the last time -- you don't have it, but all these stories about Christie being fat, they're all over the place. "Will he have the stamina? Will he have the energy? Will he have the health?" You don't have those questions. There are plenty of lard-ass women in politics, and they get a total pass on it. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201110040019
Female politicians certainly haven't received "a pass" from Limbaugh about their appearances. Limbaugh has targeted prominent politicians such as Hillary Clintonand Nancy Pelosi. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200909230026 , http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200901230011 ,
We Can Say Scozzafava Is "Guilty Of Widespread Bestiality; She Has Screwed Every RINO In The Country." During his November 2, 2009 program, Limbaugh attackedformer New York Republican congressional candidate Dede Scozzafava:
LIMBAUGH: Scozzafava has screwed every RINO in the coun -- we can say that she's guilty of widespread bestiality. She has screwed every RINO in the country. Everyone can see just see how phony and dangerous they are. You know, 2010 might be a nightmare for PETA. Two animals may become extinct; RINOs and Blue Dog Democrats. Pelosi's gonna kill off the Blue Dogs, and the conservatives are gonna finally get rid of RINOs. The American people have had enough. http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911020022
Limbaughlater defended his remarks, claiming it "was a fabulous line."
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200911030024
What Rush said was the kind of hateful, vile speech that I would expect out of none other than the infamous Westboro Baptist Church
What Rush said is nothing more than divisive rants that add nothing to the informed public view on an issue
Rush's "apology" was little more than clarification and downright justification and continuation for his shameful behavior.
I really didn't care too much about this issue before his "apology" but that really fired me up against him. He should be begging to stay on the air.
I hope that didn't sound vulgar or offensive but it's what I think.
Well said. Grab a sponsor and tell it what you think. :)
If he had spouted that vitriol about my daughter, lets just say it wouldn't be pleasant. I didn't hear the whole video until today, I'm shocked that anyone would stand up for such filth.
Number one she wasn't even talking about birth control pills for sex, but medical reasons.
A couple of people wrote that they'd opened accounts (a couple wrote that they were cancelling them too).
"Hey, maybe your left-wing "gentlemen" can talk about you that way. It's OK because they like Obama."
Is it nice to make assumptions to/about people you don't know?
When Mat Taibbi said:
“When I read [Malkin’s] stuff, I imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a BIG, HAIRY SET OF BALLS IN HER MOUTH."
Where was the outcry from the Left, NOW, Feminists in General, Fluke, Hillary, Pelosi? Where was it against Maher? And I am not talking about lip-service (Tsk Tsk)
I am talking about a daily condemnation of them, as with Rush.
Anyone can say "That doesn't apply to me." but what are you doing about it? Boycotting? Writing letters of outrage? I think not. It just goes by and everyone hopes the Left won't get in trouble or they just ignore it.
I am a conservative Republican but I get pulled in with Rush and am forced to share the blame. Why not you too? Unfair, isn't it.
Let me get this straight; instead of being the bigger person, you want to go around and generalize others. That isn't mature, I'm not a Liberal for one and this is exactly why nothing will change.
The Left and Right both have suffered from freedom of speech, so there isn't a double standard. Both sides just won't tale responsibly for their own actions. It's like two little kids pointing fingers at each other. Ed was suspended for a week, for calling a Conservative woman a derogatory name. Bill Maher lost all of his sponsors from ABC and was fired tears ago.
The Dixie Chicks were tarnished and their CD's boycotted for years, after comments they made about Bush. This list goes on and on. The same thing has happened to people on the Right. Don Imus was fired for his 'Nappy Headed Ho' comment, Glenn Beck was tarnished to a certain degree for talking about Obama kids and now Rush is being boycotted for his slut and prostitute remarks.
Once again, enough is enough. I frankly don't care what anyone has to say. Accountability is the key, and this childishness needs to end; both sides get it, this isn't anything new.
My assertions pertain to the "indefinite part" of that (liberal) class. It seems that when liberals attack conservatives, it pertains to the WHOLE class of Republicans. Watch Schultz sometime. "Republicans want you to die." "Republicans want to take away your civil rights." Ridiculous.
It's a matter of degree when liberals (most Democrats, Pelosi, etc.) go on the attack. They go on and on. Schultz had at least seven shows an the "War on Women", "The war Against Women", "Republicans Hate Women".
One does not see that vitriol coming from the right; not in that degree.
Sure. both sides have their problems but what I am saying is that with all the excessively vile things that I demonstrated in their writings, no one on the Left attacks them as viciously as they do Rush. No calls for boycotts. No calls for firings. If anything, there occasional display of anger is tepid and then dropped. If publicized to heavily, what they said makes the Left look bad and they do not want that to interfere with their ideology.
Imus was an OPPORTUNITY for Sharpton. Al got himself...
My assertions pertain to the "indefinite part" of that (liberal) class. It seems that when liberals attack conservatives, it pertains to the WHOLE class of Republicans. Watch Schultz sometime. "Republicans want you to die." "Republicans want to take away your civil rights." Ridiculous.
It's a matter of degree when liberals (most Democrats, Pelosi, etc.) go on the attack. They go on and on. Schultz had at least seven shows an the "War on Women", "The war Against Women", "Republicans Hate Women".
One does not see that vitriol coming from the right; not in that degree.
Sure. both sides have their problems but what I am saying is that with all the excessively vile things that I demonstrated in their writings, no one on the Left attacks them as viciously as they do Rush. No calls for boycotts. No calls for firings. If anything, there occasional display of anger is tepid and then dropped. If publicized to heavily, what they said makes the Left look bad and they do not want that to interfere with their ideology.
Imus was an OPPORTUNITY for Sharpton. Al got himself in the limelight again. Remember Tawana Brawley? He milked that until the charges were disproved.
I hate boycotts. I hate demands for firing. I hate demands for censorship. This is what they want for Rush, never their own.
I am for truth, no matter who speaks it. - Malcolm X
Let's just have free speech and get over it, election or not.
As for Imus, what he said was stupid; but I didn't think he deserved to be fired. That was an opportunity for Al to get into the public eye again.
If it were something more egregious, say, Hitlerian, I would boycott and urge others to do o also. Same for KKK stuff (not free speech but advocacy of violence against Blacks), anti Semitic stuff (same conditions), let's just say any group advocating violence or deprivation of civil rights, through actions, I would boycott.
Thanks for your response.
But you forgot the 'caller abortions' he used to perform on any caller who had the temerity to disagree with him and do so skillfully. That was when he was still in the backwater of Sacramento, CA.