Quantcast

Rush Limbaugh OR Rev. Al Sharpton?

jt 2012/06/27 18:35:04
Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
Rev. Sharpton is the voice just for the left with lot of lies...
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Who represents the mass with real facts, responsiblity and truth?

jt
+13
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Iamfree 2012/06/27 18:37:14
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Iamfree
    +15
    Rush is rarely wrong in his facts. Sharpton just doesn't bother with facts.
    >> See Replies

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • alonnas... KingdomNow 2012/06/28 00:33:55
    alonnastorm
    +2
    Following rush's lead...what if someone called ur mom a slut?
    reply
  • KingdomNow alonnas... 2012/06/28 04:24:12
    KingdomNow
    +1
    Since my mom's dead it would reflect more on the person who did the calling.

    In this case, after the truth was out, Rush was right.
    reply
  • alonnas... KingdomNow 2012/06/28 04:37:28
    alonnastorm
    +2
    The fact that ur mom is dead changes nothing... After what truth was out??? Evidence!!!???
    reply
  • KingdomNow alonnas... 2012/06/28 05:02:49
    KingdomNow
    +1
    The slut in question was no poverty-class victim, as portrayed by the left-wing media. She could easily afford her own over the counter birth control yet whined about how taxpayers should foot the bill for her free ride.

    Why?

    Fluke was portrayed as a 23-year-old student when she is a 30-year-old pro-abortion activist who later claimed that the story she used in her testimony wasn't her own but of "a student she knew". She intended to mislead Congress on the issue of forced coverage of contraception.

    Fluke was a fake.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/f...
    reply
  • JP alonnas... 2012/06/28 00:36:42
    JP
    +1
    You mean Sandra "wet swamp nine times a day" Fluke?
    reply
  • alonnas... JP 2012/06/28 01:57:52
    alonnastorm
    +1
    Right winged sheep
    reply
  • JP alonnas... 2012/06/28 02:08:58
    JP
    +2
    left wing moonbat

    You get your bounty yet for going after George Zimmerman?
    reply
  • alonnas... JP 2012/06/28 02:18:04
    alonnastorm
    +1
    Clown Republicans Clown Republicans
    reply
  • JP alonnas... 2012/06/28 02:19:54
    JP
    +2
    Nice one! I found the king of the clowns!

    joker obama
    reply
  • Space I... JP 2012/06/28 03:33:57
    Space Invader
    +1
    he's no Jack Nicholson or Heath Ledger jack as the joker heath as the joker
    reply
  • JP Space I... 2012/06/28 03:41:27
    JP
    +1
    No, cause they are just acting!
    reply
  • alonnas... JP 2012/06/28 04:42:39
    alonnastorm
    +1
    Clown Romney
    Go mittens
    reply
  • JP alonnas... 2012/06/29 15:53:04
    JP
    They are all brothers from different mothers, aren't they? pelosi joker
    reply
  • unclepat Space I... 2012/06/28 18:05:30
    unclepat
    +2
    One response....Rush thinks you use the pill EVERY TIME YOU HAVE SEX!!!
    reply
  • Maddog 2012/06/27 23:00:41
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Maddog
    +3
    I admit that Limbaugh can be obnoxious at times, but he always tries to back up his assertions with fact. Al Sharpton, on the other hand, is merely a "Johnny One Note" crying "racism!" at every incident involving an black person. In doing so, he has succeeded in trivializing a serious topic. Anyone remember Tawana Brawley?
    reply
  • DFA 2012/06/27 22:57:05
    Undecided
    DFA
    +2
    Neither please. Both are looney.

    looney tunes
    reply
  • WGN 2012/06/27 22:50:42
    Undecided
    WGN
    +2
    It is definitely NOT Rush, but Al isn't far behind. Neither of them has a real clue as to what is really happening as both are too caught up in the political rhetoric of his respective side.
    Rush is an idiot. Al is a loud mouthed buffoon.
    reply
  • Angie 2012/06/27 22:46:35
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Angie
    +1
    JT my friend, is this a trick question? Truth is not in Sharpton's vocabulary.
    reply
  • Flash,aka,Mr.Lightning 2012/06/27 22:36:58
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Flash,aka,Mr.Lightning
    +1
    Tawanna Brawley!
    reply
  • Radlad 2012/06/27 22:11:35
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Radlad
    +1
    nuff said
    reply
  • The Catalyst 2012/06/27 21:59:20
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    The Catalyst
    +4
    Sharpton is just a racist hate monger.
    reply
  • Brat 2012/06/27 21:50:04
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Brat
    +4
    Ha, Sharpton just sits around waiting for his next ambulance chasing opportunity so he deal out his race card.
    reply
  • AM 2012/06/27 21:42:37
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    AM
    +3
    Rush is an entertainer..controversial Yes .But if there was a match of wits between sharpton and Limbaugh My money is on Rush
    reply
  • Chukroast 2012/06/27 21:35:45
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Chukroast
    +2
    OK, maybe about 92% truth and 8% hyperbole.
    reply
  • wolf sloan 2012/06/27 21:32:27
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    wolf sloan
    +1
    Lesser of the choices, though both are a bit out there.
    reply
  • prosperhappily 2012/06/27 21:25:19
    Undecided
    prosperhappily
    +1
    Not a huge fan of either.

    Given a choice I'd take Rush. I don't agree with a lot of the things he says. But, I agree with him sometimes.

    I have no respect for Al Sharpton at all. He's every bit as bigoted as those he condemns.
    reply
  • lm1b2 2012/06/27 21:24:51
    Undecided
    lm1b2
    +2
    I think these two should hook up,what a team.
    reply
  • prosper... lm1b2 2012/06/27 21:25:42
    prosperhappily
    +3
    Cage match at summerslam?
    reply
  • Sofahead 2012/06/27 21:08:24
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    Sofahead
    +4
    While this an over statement, it is a very easy answer compared to Al Sharpton, his being a "Reverend" doesn't do anything to enhance his standing.
    reply
  • Ozzyboy 2012/06/27 21:03:07
    Undecided
    Ozzyboy
    +3
    I can't stand 2 seconds of 'ol mushmouf Sharpless. He is such a liar. I also don't listen to Limbaugh. I get clips of both on occasion but I find less wrong with what Limbaugh says.
    reply
  • CAPISCE 2012/06/27 20:33:12
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    CAPISCE
    +1
    I don't like either to be honest
    reply
  • TuringsChild 2012/06/27 20:26:47
    Undecided
    TuringsChild
    +1
    One is an entertainer, the other is a hate-monger. Why should EITHER be expected to give 'real facts, responsiblity and truth'?
    reply
  • TheTruth1313 2012/06/27 20:24:29
    Rush is the voice of truth for all, entertainer and pundit...
    TheTruth1313
    +4
    This one was too easy to answer.
    reply
  • tblackb 2012/06/27 20:17:32 (edited)
    Rev. Sharpton is the voice just for the left with lot of lies...
    tblackb
    +3
    i suggest that people take a few moments and watch fox, msnbc, and ccn. Rush is just a different type of stupid! anyone listening to what he said about sandra fluke can tell that inside of a minute! Rush should know what takes place on college campus' across this country or he would have perhaps if he'd only graduated college!
    reply
  • Warren - Novus Ordo Seclorum 2012/06/27 20:10:53
    Undecided
    Warren - Novus Ordo Seclorum
    +3
    I'm not a fan of either, but Limbaugh is definitely more conspiratorial and untethered from reality. Truth almost never passes from his lips.
    reply
  • fuzzy K... Warren ... 2012/06/27 21:03:26
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    +3
    ...and Sharpton's assertion that Holder is being persecuted by Issa over Fast and Furious only because Holder is black is not "conspiratorial and untethered from reality"?
    reply
  • Warren ... fuzzy K... 2012/06/27 21:05:12
    Warren - Novus Ordo Seclorum
    +2
    I didn't come here to defend Sharpton, but that is nowhere near as bad as Limbaughs conspiracy fantasies about Fast and Furious.
    reply
  • Quietma... fuzzy K... 2012/06/27 22:18:38
    Quietman ~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    I'd say warren hasn't dealt with reality for awhile!
    reply
  • alonnas... fuzzy K... 2012/06/28 04:59:38
    alonnastorm
    +1
    The program started under bush...Rev is right
    reply
  • fuzzy K... alonnas... 2012/06/28 13:31:01
    fuzzy Ken "In G-d We Trust"
    +1
    You're half right.
    A similar program did start under Bush. That program had tracking devices in the guns. It was done with Mexico's knowledge and their cooperation. Some of the devices failed and the program was scrapped under Bush without anybody getting hurt.
    Fast and Furious was started under Obama with no tracking devices, no way to monitor the 2000 guns we handed to Mexican Drug runners and no disclosure to the Mexicans. Hundreds of people were murdered using the weapons we provided including a Federal Agent.

    See the difference?
    reply
«« First « Prev 1 2 3 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 14:17:59

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals