Ron Paul: what will he be able to do at the convention?
|
|
|||||
|
55 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
11 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
70 votes
|
|
42% | |||
Over the weekend, reports came in from Examiner.com (Wilmington, DE and their National
edition). They showed Ron Paul winning delegates in Missouri, Colorado
and Minnesota that everyone thought would go to Romney or Santorum.
Santorum then quit the race last week, and never said how he expected
“his” delegates to vote. The two Examiners seemed to think that many of
them would vote for Ron Paul and not for Mitt Romney. In any
event, Ron Paul knew that caucuses would select delegates, because
primaries were non-binding. Not only are those primaries non-binding;
they have no influence on what caucuses do.
The Colorado results are most interesting. Caucuses chose 36
delegates. Sources did not seem to agree on how they would vote. But
those who investigated the matter closely, realized what had happened. RealClearPolitics, for instance, says
that Mitt Romney had the most delegates. In fact, he “won” 13
delegates, against 6 for Santorum. The caucuses chose 17 others who did not pledge their votes. But where do their loyalties lie? Tom Mullen at The Washington Times thinks he knows. Todd King of Lewis, CO, one of those “unpledged” delegates, told Mr. Mullen this:
13 unpledged delegates, including me, will vote for Ron
Paul on the first ballot. One unpledged delegate will vote for Santorum.
The remaining three unpledged delegates, also known as the ‘delegates
at large,’ are the state GOP Chairman, the state GOP National
Committeeman and the National Committeewoman. Those three will likely
vote for Romney. They usually vote for the frontrunner so as not to make
waves.
So Ron Paul can count on as many delegate votes as Mitt Romney can,
or almost as many, depending on how the super-delegates vote.
Missouri Republicans changed their caucus rules,
under pressure from many who felt that the Republican “establishment”
wanted them to shut-up and let them do things their way. Ron Paul hopes
to “dominate” in Missouri when Republican voters there meet in caucus
this Saturday and in June.
The Ron Paul campaign flatly disputes the AP/New York Times delegate tally. In March they showed the true delegate strength as:
- Mitt Romney: 425
- Rick Santorum: 361
- Ron Paul: 225
- Newt Gingrich: 165
One commenter on that page explained how Ron Paul’s supporters get delegates:
This isn’t for sissies. You have to go to the meetings,
meet people and tell them your name so they’ll remember you when it
comes time to vote in delegates, etc. And frankly, it’s boring. I
listened to a long speech tonight and there were a million other things I
would’ve rather been doing (like reading on here or griping with my RP
friends on Facebook).
If those who support the other three candidates are less willing to
listen to “boring…long speech[es]” and forgo their “million other things
[they'd] rather [do],” then of course they’re losing delegates. They
leave the field to Ron Paul.
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/04/16...






















"A GOP rule for the convention states that “each candidate for nomination for president of the United States and vice president of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination."
http://www.newsmax.com/Politi...
But Ron Paul's position in the party will be determined by how many delegates he will have.
Here's how I have it
0-100 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul, Romney would have won nomination handily
100-200 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul
200-300 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul
300-400 delegates= Short speech at Convention (10-20 mins)
400-500 delegates= Medium-lengthed speech at convention (20-30 mins)
500-600 delegates= Long speech at Convention (30-60 mins)
600-700 delegates= Influence platform
700-800 delegates= Influence multiple positions on platform
800-900 delegates= Change platform (not completely)
900-1000 delegates= Administration position
1000-1100 delegate= VP
1142+= nomination
Now I'm not a fool, in order for Ron Paul to secure the nomination, it will take a win in every remaining state. But I'm hoping in these next few states he can capture momentum on Santorum leaving and hit the 500-700 mark.
But I do urge Republi...
But Ron Paul's position in the party will be determined by how many delegates he will have.
Here's how I have it
0-100 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul, Romney would have won nomination handily
100-200 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul
200-300 delegates= Nothing for Ron Paul
300-400 delegates= Short speech at Convention (10-20 mins)
400-500 delegates= Medium-lengthed speech at convention (20-30 mins)
500-600 delegates= Long speech at Convention (30-60 mins)
600-700 delegates= Influence platform
700-800 delegates= Influence multiple positions on platform
800-900 delegates= Change platform (not completely)
900-1000 delegates= Administration position
1000-1100 delegate= VP
1142+= nomination
Now I'm not a fool, in order for Ron Paul to secure the nomination, it will take a win in every remaining state. But I'm hoping in these next few states he can capture momentum on Santorum leaving and hit the 500-700 mark.
But I do urge Republicans, although Ron Paul maybe irrelevant at the convention.
He's very relevant in the general election, Ron Paul probably has between 1 and 3 million supporters, supporters who will not vote traditional big government, bad on civil liberties, Republican line.
So if Republicans want to beat Obama they must find a way to bring in Ron Paul supporters, and not ostracize them.
I know many republicans are stupid enough to vote for an Obama as long as he has an R by his name, but I never said "vote for Obama". I said voting for Obama is no different than voting for Romney.
I'll vote for real change with a third party if the republicans nominate Obama.
Only a fool would continue to live in this two party dictatorship.
Unless silly letters next to their name or skin color matters.
You're a fool.
Realistically, if you dont like Obama, you're a fool for voting for Romney, and same for if you dont like Romney.
If you hate them both, then you go for the 3rd party, and not vote for either fraud.
see I see it as beating Obama will continue spreading the message of liberty.
Did you know under NDAA if you're even "suspected" of terrorism you can be indefinetely detained, which means no trial. Which means how are you proven to be a terrorist.
The government is growing larger every day.
just not as many people were listening. I know I wasn't.
Ron Paul certainly was against the patriot act while Bush was president.
We have some trolls here using commie names!
But anyways I predict his finished R-primaries with close to 2 million votes, and then i'd say nearly 1M voters couldn't vote now.
So 3M people in the election only is about 3% of voters, but where those voters go can make or break an election. But I hope those voters go Republican. because that's the party that has accomodated classical liberals the most.
See all of these supporters are hearing the message, and wanting to spread it. So even if Ron Paul loses, he could have influenced the careers of many future politicians.
We seeing right now, more and more people are using the message of liberty to become politicians.
And it won't be just about one guy any more, it will be about many people.