Ron Paul: what will he be able to do at the convention?
|
|
|||||
|
55 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
11 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
70 votes
|
|
42% | |||
Over the weekend, reports came in from Examiner.com (Wilmington, DE and their National
edition). They showed Ron Paul winning delegates in Missouri, Colorado
and Minnesota that everyone thought would go to Romney or Santorum.
Santorum then quit the race last week, and never said how he expected
“his” delegates to vote. The two Examiners seemed to think that many of
them would vote for Ron Paul and not for Mitt Romney. In any
event, Ron Paul knew that caucuses would select delegates, because
primaries were non-binding. Not only are those primaries non-binding;
they have no influence on what caucuses do.
The Colorado results are most interesting. Caucuses chose 36
delegates. Sources did not seem to agree on how they would vote. But
those who investigated the matter closely, realized what had happened. RealClearPolitics, for instance, says
that Mitt Romney had the most delegates. In fact, he “won” 13
delegates, against 6 for Santorum. The caucuses chose 17 others who did not pledge their votes. But where do their loyalties lie? Tom Mullen at The Washington Times thinks he knows. Todd King of Lewis, CO, one of those “unpledged” delegates, told Mr. Mullen this:
13 unpledged delegates, including me, will vote for Ron
Paul on the first ballot. One unpledged delegate will vote for Santorum.
The remaining three unpledged delegates, also known as the ‘delegates
at large,’ are the state GOP Chairman, the state GOP National
Committeeman and the National Committeewoman. Those three will likely
vote for Romney. They usually vote for the frontrunner so as not to make
waves.
So Ron Paul can count on as many delegate votes as Mitt Romney can,
or almost as many, depending on how the super-delegates vote.
Missouri Republicans changed their caucus rules,
under pressure from many who felt that the Republican “establishment”
wanted them to shut-up and let them do things their way. Ron Paul hopes
to “dominate” in Missouri when Republican voters there meet in caucus
this Saturday and in June.
The Ron Paul campaign flatly disputes the AP/New York Times delegate tally. In March they showed the true delegate strength as:
- Mitt Romney: 425
- Rick Santorum: 361
- Ron Paul: 225
- Newt Gingrich: 165
One commenter on that page explained how Ron Paul’s supporters get delegates:
This isn’t for sissies. You have to go to the meetings,
meet people and tell them your name so they’ll remember you when it
comes time to vote in delegates, etc. And frankly, it’s boring. I
listened to a long speech tonight and there were a million other things I
would’ve rather been doing (like reading on here or griping with my RP
friends on Facebook).
If those who support the other three candidates are less willing to
listen to “boring…long speech[es]” and forgo their “million other things
[they'd] rather [do],” then of course they’re losing delegates. They
leave the field to Ron Paul.
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/04/16...






















This is one of those times....yes it IS one of those times...that we CANNOT afford to elect another status quo, puppet politician.
Ron Paul supporters will abandon him once they realize there is only going to be 2 choices. The Devil or the nearly devil or non-angel whichever you prefer.
The only wasted vote will be the one for Obama which will be one in the same if you do something stupid like stack the deck or a third party ticket. Then my young friend, the blood will be on your hands. We'll have a whole 4 more years reprieve to find a viable president. Lose that however, your pretty much screwed.
This is a dictator ... and an example of the communist sheeple in this country.
Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.
~ James Madison
"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force"
~ Thomas Jefferson
The Constitution grants specific powers to the Congress.
Then it says that any power that the federal government does not have, the States and the people keep for themselves. Amendment X. Look it up.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
The people elect representatives to create laws and institutions that manage our country's infrastructure. The Department of Education is one of them, among others. Again, I'm not saying that I like the DOE, but because the language is so vague and can be interpreted in a number of ways, this is just one instance of one opinion verses another.
Then you encourage one aggrieved patriot after another to say, "I refuse to obey your regulations because they are unconstitutional!" Then come the arrests, and the counterclaims, and thus the controversies that percolate to the Supreme Court.
That would take a lot of time. Better to get a sympathetic House as well as a Senate, and then pass a CJR deeming these prior acts null and void.
While they're at it, they should investigate the Obama eligibility question, with a view to passing another CJR deeming all of Obama's acts null and void.
In the meantime, issue an EO declaring all prior EOs null and void. (Or at least those regarding activities other than those of the departments that the Constitution authorizes.)
I'll probably run to take some refresher courses in medicine, and prepare to run off to join the Machal Medical Corps in Israel.
On a side note- Uncle Sam sure as hell doesn't want us to lol.