Ron Paul Supporters Show Their 'class' Once Again

by Balladeer-PWCM-POTL Posted 2012/05/14 14:44:01

Related Topics: Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, College, Romney, Mitt, Class

31 votes
Read all 73 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	" I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it"	5 votes	16%
	The Paulpukes will NOT be happy until Obama wins a second term	18 votes	58%
	Other: because I just want to take up blogspace	8 votes	26%

Well folks , the Paulpukes have once again showed just what sort of 'people' they truly are . Mitt Romney's son was speaking at a college in AZ..well the paulpukes did what they do best...

Add a comment above

Red Branch 2012/05/14 15:06:37

The Paulpukes will NOT be happy until Obama wins a second term

+9
Many of the Paulistas are Hard Left Liberal 5th columnists working to derail the Republican nominee.
Proof of this is in their Hard Left Liberal behaviors like the topic in this conversation.
Preventing someone from speaking has been a Hard Left Liberal strategy since the 1960s.
Proof is in the attacks on those that do not go along with their positions, demonize and destroy as directed by Alinsky.

As I see it, a true Libertarian would not object to someone exercising his or her First Amendment right of Free Speech. If you don't want to hear what they have to say, stay home.

Think about the most vocal and vicious Paulistas and the positions they supported before the campaign began. It was always the Obama position, unless they considered it too right wing.
>> See Replies

More polls by Balladeer-PWCM-POTL

DougE 2012/06/09 03:04:37

The Paulpukes will NOT be happy until Obama wins a second term

Paul Pukes are just plain ridiculous. Their argument for writing in their loser candidate and not voting for Romney makes not sense. Who can take these folks serious when they yell and scream like idiots!

reply
Ballade... to DougE 2012/06/09 18:27:40

very well put

reply
rogerkatrina 2012/05/17 00:50:46

Other: because I just want to take up blogspace

I love the biased labeling of your polling options. I have said repeatedly in Facebook, Google+ and here that although I was in favor of Ron Paul for the Republican nomination, (because he was the most intelligent and statesmanlike candidate), I will not support Ron Paul running on an independent ticket because it is a surefire way to divide the opposition to the current despotism and give them another four years. I think that most people who support Ron Paul will willingly support Romney once they realize he is not going to become President on the Republican ticket. Who knows? maybe he will bring his delegates into the Romney ticket by being tapped for VP.

reply
Ballade... to rogerka... 2012/05/17 01:08:50

as for how i word MY questions...if you don't like it...don't reply....ahhh but then paulpukes can't swarm a blog like they are want to do....as for Paul as veep Romney needs someone that will carry the south and there just 'ain't' enough of you kooks to do that...oh and before you deny there are kooks...let me share with you a quote from your fellow paulpuke...

" I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it"

reply
rogerka... to Ballade... 2012/05/17 01:52:41

Okay, for your information I was sent an invitation to view and give an answer to this poll. I could tell by the vitriolic, biased way you asked it that my opinion wasn't really desired. That's okay. You're entitled to your own opinion and I am too. The only thing I have to wonder is why you even asked the question if you weren't desiring real and honest answers from people. Then again, by the looks of it, you were only looking for affirmation from like minded Romney supporters. You'll never learn anything new that way, but maybe your comfortable in your complacency.
As for the allegation that there are "kooks" in the ranks of Paul supporters, I would have to agree with you, simply because there are "kooks" in the world. Those who support Ron Paul are not any more immune to their fair share of "kooks" than Romney, Gingrich, Santorum or Obama supporters are. Every group has them. The best thing for you and I to do is realize that we share a common goal. That goal is the REMOVAL of Barack Hussein Obama from the White House this November. I have no reason to fight with you or any Romney supporter. I DO think Ron Paul would make a better President than any of the other candidates or Obama. But I doubt there's any way to convince you of that. So let's focus on our common goal. Okay?

reply
Ballade... to rogerka... 2012/05/17 01:56:19

invited..is a great euphemism for swarmed....you paulpulkes pulled that on me over a year ago to drive me out of SH it didn't work..and it's not forgotten...your great presidential candidate lost Oregoin and Nebraska last night...as of right NOW...your Messiah has....

106 delegates

reply
rogerka... to Ballade... 2012/05/19 01:12:04 (edited)

My Messiah is Jesus. My favored candidate is ABO... 106 delegates or not, Paul would make a better President, but the lack of a capacity for logic and reason has blinded many people to that. the only thing I really think Paul should work on is his views on foreign policy, but that's something he could appoint good advisers to help him with. That is something he is much better at doing than the current occupier of the White House, for sure. I'm not here to fight with you. I'm not a Paul-puke either. I just have the ability to analyze a situation and see things the way they are. Take the blinders off and look at the situation America's in. We need some serious answers. I certainly hope that Mitt Romney is prepared to find some for us, because it looks like he's going to be the only alternative we will have to four more years of Obama. Are you really prepared for that?

reply
Ballade... to rogerka... 2012/05/19 05:38:38

and the slimy act of advancing the LegalWeeditarian agenda by allying with a Prince of Evil named Barney Frank...totally unimportant to you paulpukes...I am going to hold my nose and vote for romney...because i am NOT a paulpuke..paulpukes are going to help obama get a second term by throwing a temper tantrum

reply
rogerka... to Ballade... 2012/05/19 14:45:56

Well as I said I'm not a paulpuke and, although I think he would be the best man for the job I will vote for Romney if he's the Republican nominee. I think Paul has the smarts to not go in on an independent ticket...

reply
Ballade... to rogerka... 2012/05/19 15:27:49

no he doesn't...so we will see...with spooky Dude pulling the Quisling's strings anything can happen

reply
ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/05/15 16:55:29

The Paulpukes will NOT be happy until Obama wins a second term

+1
Face it folks, he's done.

reply
Ballade... to ScottyG... 2012/05/15 18:47:41

+1
they won't...and he is

reply
ScottyG... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 21:39:17

+1
I know and you know. Why don't they?

reply
Ballade... to ScottyG... 2012/05/15 21:53:32

+1
OUR brains are functioning and NOT clouded with weed, or kooky conspiracies spooned out every night on AM Coast To Coast. not clouded with FEAR like the paulpukes...but clear with a resolve that the REPUBLIC and it's survival is bigger then my own selfish feelings....BY THE WAY...i KNOW this as a fact because in 2008 I was ONE OF THEM...so selfish, so stupid, so petty...I voted Constitution party as a protest....i couldn't imagine the nightmare I was aiding...well NOT THIS TIME AROUND

reply
ScottyG... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 22:02:50

You got unplugged from the Matrix!

reply
Ballade... to ScottyG... 2012/05/15 22:04:52

+1
I guess...it's somethign I am STILL ashamed about hence my vitriol at the paulpukes and Weedtarians (libertarians)

reply
ScottyG... to Ballade... 2012/05/16 02:28:15

I say let it go and concentrate on getting rid of Obie. He's our collective biggest problem in America.

reply
Icono1 2012/05/14 22:35:38

Other: because I just want to take up blogspace

You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.

----- Boris Bazhanov's Memoirs of Stalin's Former Secretary

reply
Sawdust_128 2012/05/14 21:54:15

The Paulpukes will NOT be happy until Obama wins a second term

+1
Ron Paul practices desperation politics............ and his followers throw FUD.

“It’s an original way of announcing that a presidential campaign is over, but that’s what the statement amounts to,” Politico writer Alexander Burns says.

Reacting to the news on Fox News Channel, Sheppard Smith said Ron Paul was “out of the race.”

But Business Insider isn‘t reading finality into Paul’s words, reporting “The statement makes it clear that Paul is not dropping out of the race.” It explains:

In some ways, the announcement merely formalizes the delegate strategy that the campaign has focused on for the past few months. But there is a finality in the language of today‘s statement that indicates that Paul’s longshot presidential bid may be nearing its inevitable end.

Still, the popular Drudge Report agreed with Smith, posting the headline “Paul Out:”

reply
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/05/14 19:21:04

Other: because I just want to take up blogspace

+1
Something else went on at Oklahoma, that wasn't very "classy" of Mitt Romney's people, if half of what I hear is correct:

http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/14 23:38:14

+1
this was in AZ, my friend

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/14 23:53:57

Well, let's talk about that Arizona dust-up. Why did the establishmentarians shut it down, in violation of the rules?

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/14 23:55:23

why did the Paulpukes boo Romney's son off the stage which IS the subject of this blog

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 01:44:15

Probably because they thought he was "in on it."

And let me ask you something, in all seriousness:

Which is worse?

Boos?

Or fisticuffs?

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 01:45:14

or paulpukes are really thugs

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 01:47:02

Maybe you didn't get my point: in Oklahoma, the thuggish behavior was all on the Romney side. Romney people swung their fists and connected with Paul people. Someone had to call the police to separate the combatants. Was that classy?

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 01:48:43

hmm I bet the paulpukes started it

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 02:02:45

From everything I have read, and I read a lot of articles that I would ask you to read (by following a link to my Oklahoma Republican Delegates poll), you would lose that bet.

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 02:05:15

riiighhhht paulpukes are the epitome of moderation, restraint, open mindness..

"I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it"

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 18:42:33

There's something you have to know.

The account about Josh Romney "getting booed off the stage"--is in dispute.

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 18:48:12

by paulpukes i bet

reply
Temlako... to Ballade... 2012/05/15 18:50:20

Well, don't just make wagers here. Search Google News for the latest. It might surprise you.

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 18:58:27

actually I have a standing wager...if ron Paul is the GOP PRESIDENTIAL Nominee i leave Sodahead...if he isn't then the paulkpuke that takes my wager takes a hike form Sodahead FOR GOOD...paupukes have shown their 'faith' in Ron Paul by NOT taking my bet

reply
Ballade... to Temlako... 2012/05/15 19:02:52

I did..there was NO MENTION OF WHAT YOU JUST CLAIMED... you just LIED shall I post the Video HERE since you are unable to scroll up...

NOW WHAT IS TO BE DUSPUTED????

reply
Næthan Æterna 2012/05/14 18:40:28

Other: because I just want to take up blogspace

+1
How can people on this blog call us Liberals when in fact, we support someone who is MORE conservative than Mitt Romney? That makes a lot of sense. It's plain and simple: we don't like Romney! Give us a better candidate or just STFU and let us vote how we personally feel is right and STOP TRAMPLING ON OUR RIGHTS!

reply
DJL to Næthan ... 2012/05/14 22:20:28

Some of Paul's positions are left of Obama.

reply
Næthan ... to DJL 2012/05/14 22:24:15

I guess I can see that, like views on the War. Didn't really think of it that way, Dan. But to call us Liberals is just whacky.

reply
Ballade... to Næthan ... 2012/05/14 23:40:13

is it....liberals refuse to accept FACTS make up weird conspiracy theories to excuse their leader...which can ALSO apply to a Paulpuke

reply
rogerka... to Ballade... 2012/05/17 01:41:29

I take issue with your statement that libertarians are liberals. Libertarians are libertarians. Some of them lean to the left. Some of them lean to the right. Some of them, (like me for example), are very close to the center. I would encourage you to take a gander at the Nolan Chart I've provided below. The far corner of Libertarianism, (and just a smidgen to the right of center) is where I stood when I was given a quiz on my political, economic and social views. I suggest you take the same quiz and then maybe even educate yourself a little better on the different aspects and dimensions of the political spectrum. No offense intended.

http://images.sodahead.com/pr...

reply
Ballade... to rogerka... 2012/05/17 01:51:05

little sensitive are we weedeater?

reply