Obviously, you are making a play, on a pro-Israel agenda, and that's fine! Using Ron Paul, to do so... questions your real support. However, if you truly are a Ron Paul supporter than that is all that needs to be said. We know his position on foreign aid, and his position on not forcing Israel to be our bitch. Your poll is derisive, and that goes against Dr. Paul's message.
The facts remain there are more Jews in America, than in Israel.
Israel, has an estimated (and unconfirmed) 300, varied, nuclear delivery systems. And numerous other U.S. supplied arms, like AWACS to compliment their own excellent arms manufacturing and modification skills. There is plenty of Quid pro quo.
While the global economy is effecting everyone, Israels economy is stronger than the U.S.
If it comes down to choosing between a pro-American stance and a pro- Israel one, which would you choose? America first!
Israel is a sovereign nation, who should determine their own fate, without getting permission from our corrupt government first.
Any cost-benefit analysis would (and has) shown the inequality in this relationship. Our support of Israel has come at a high cost, both politically and practically.
The Israeli lobbying machine in Washington, is far too powerful and successful, as Ron Paul has r...
The facts remain there are more Jews in America, than in Israel.
Israel, has an estimated (and unconfirmed) 300, varied, nuclear delivery systems. And numerous other U.S. supplied arms, like AWACS to compliment their own excellent arms manufacturing and modification skills. There is plenty of Quid pro quo.
While the global economy is effecting everyone, Israels economy is stronger than the U.S.
If it comes down to choosing between a pro-American stance and a pro- Israel one, which would you choose? America first!
Israel is a sovereign nation, who should determine their own fate, without getting permission from our corrupt government first.
Any cost-benefit analysis would (and has) shown the inequality in this relationship. Our support of Israel has come at a high cost, both politically and practically.
The Israeli lobbying machine in Washington, is far too powerful and successful, as Ron Paul has r...
Obviously, you are making a play, on a pro-Israel agenda, and that's fine! Using Ron Paul, to do so... questions your real support. However, if you truly are a Ron Paul supporter than that is all that needs to be said. We know his position on foreign aid, and his position on not forcing Israel to be our bitch. Your poll is derisive, and that goes against Dr. Paul's message.
The facts remain there are more Jews in America, than in Israel.
Israel, has an estimated (and unconfirmed) 300, varied, nuclear delivery systems. And numerous other U.S. supplied arms, like AWACS to compliment their own excellent arms manufacturing and modification skills. There is plenty of Quid pro quo.
While the global economy is effecting everyone, Israels economy is stronger than the U.S.
If it comes down to choosing between a pro-American stance and a pro- Israel one, which would you choose? America first!
Israel is a sovereign nation, who should determine their own fate, without getting permission from our corrupt government first.
Any cost-benefit analysis would (and has) shown the inequality in this relationship. Our support of Israel has come at a high cost, both politically and practically.
The Israeli lobbying machine in Washington, is far too powerful and successful, as Ron Paul has reminded us.
If Israel feels threatened by Iran, and wants to attack, or invade... go for it! You don't need us. And if you do, perhaps you should reconsider. At what cost to America, would aiding or performing a preemptive first-strike against Iran. How would the closing of the straights of Hormuz damage the American economy? How would the world respond to America, without proof of WMD's? Bush used it as a false-flag reasoning with Iraq... would it be any different with Iran?
We can't defend our own borders, let alone anyone else's, without further insolvency or sacrifice of American lives.
The U.S and Israel enjoy long standing strategic corporation. However, it was Benjamin Netanyahu, who said, "America doesn't have to Nation build here, we are already a nation."
Both Benjamin Netanyahu and Ron Paul are on the same page.
Obama and Romney are all rhetoric.
(more)The facts remain there are more Jews in America, than in Israel.
Israel, has an estimated (and unconfirmed) 300, varied, nuclear delivery systems. And numerous other U.S. supplied arms, like AWACS to compliment their own excellent arms manufacturing and modification skills. There is plenty of Quid pro quo.
While the global economy is effecting everyone, Israels economy is stronger than the U.S.
If it comes down to choosing between a pro-American stance and a pro- Israel one, which would you choose? America first!
Israel is a sovereign nation, who should determine their own fate, without getting permission from our corrupt government first.
Any cost-benefit analysis would (and has) shown the inequality in this relationship. Our support of Israel has come at a high cost, both politically and practically.
The Israeli lobbying machine in Washington, is far too powerful and successful, as Ron Paul has reminded us.
If Israel feels threatened by Iran, and wants to attack, or invade... go for it! You don't need us. And if you do, perhaps you should reconsider. At what cost to America, would aiding or performing a preemptive first-strike against Iran. How would the closing of the straights of Hormuz damage the American economy? How would the world respond to America, without proof of WMD's? Bush used it as a false-flag reasoning with Iraq... would it be any different with Iran?
We can't defend our own borders, let alone anyone else's, without further insolvency or sacrifice of American lives.
The U.S and Israel enjoy long standing strategic corporation. However, it was Benjamin Netanyahu, who said, "America doesn't have to Nation build here, we are already a nation."
Both Benjamin Netanyahu and Ron Paul are on the same page.
Obama and Romney are all rhetoric.
I get it!
If you are so concerned with Israel over your own country, you are free to move there.
I can imagine an atheist saying the first, and a Muslim saying the second, but in that case those would just be their religious beliefs...beliefs to be tolerated, just as you would want them to tolerate your own. Not everyone is a Christian, but that doesn't make them enemies of the Constitution or liberty at all.
Honestly, I think you might be wrapping your religious beliefs too tightly with your political beliefs, to the point where you're having trouble seeing how other people often treat them separately. I could be wrong, but it seems like you're getting very wound up about the existence of Muslims and atheists and jumping to the conclusion that they must be anti-liberty or anti-Constitution because of their religious beliefs...that's really not the case. Atheists DO believe the Bible is a myth, etc.; you know what you believe, so why not let them believe as they do? You can both agree to disagree on religious truth and support liberty all the same.
somewhere along the line ,you have snapped and your delusions have taken over.LOL
LOL iceland ??LOL why i moved back to the western sudan .
as you see,the fish didn't or could not grasp that concept.LOL
Paul explained the promises to the seed so long ago. Read Galatians please. To the seed, which is Jesus, and all who are in him being as the sands of the sea and starts of the heavens. FAITH not some endless genealogies trying to prove your somehow a member of a lost tribe of Israel. I've studied this out before and truly, you are faced with the question of how to even know for sure according to choppy historical details and then how diluted your "israelite blood" has become. It's insane.
Galatians 3-
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Colossians 3:10-11
"10 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
11 Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all."
Tuna, do you pledge your loyalty to the US?