Quantcast

Ron Paul Quits campaign.....

BrianD3 2012/05/16 11:25:06
You!
Add Photos & Videos
He disappeared in the dead of May:

The screens were frozen, the forums almost deserted,


A hush fell over the YouTube comments;


The mercury sank in the mouth of the caucus crew.


E’en mainstream media agree


The day Ron Paul stopped was a dark cold day.



That’s probably a bit much, especially the “e’en,” but the departure of Dr. Ron Paul from the presidential race — he announced Monday that he wasn’t competing for any new delegates, and clarified the statement on Tuesday — left a distinctly autumnal feeling in the air. It was the sort of news that gave you the urge to march around attempting ineptly to adapt Auden’s poem about the death of Yeats to the occasion.


What are we going to do without Dr. Paul?


All the strange uncles of the 2012 race have been lopped off. Thanksgiving dinner is bound to be quieter, but it will not be nearly so amusing. There will be no 9-9-9, no End the Fed, no sweater vests. We are left, on the right side of the aisle — depending on how exciting the week of news is — with either the Worst Man Ever, a Wealth-Addled Menace to Both Dogs and Humans, Who Is a Vampire and Predator and Destroys Businesses and is a Terrible Cultist, although possibly not all at the same time, or A Man So Bland That It’s Impossible to Finish This Sentence Without Drifting Off to Sleep. This is the trouble with our two-party system. It has a tendency to weed out strange uncles.


I’m going to miss Ron Paul. He was — to say the least — a consistent presence.


Paul spokesman Jesse Benton noted that the campaign was “emphasizing decorum.” He admitted: “Our supporters are going to get an excessive amount of blame for problems that arise at heated conventions.” This is not entirely fair.


Then again, in my admittedly limited experience of caucus speakers, it is not entirely unfair, either. The Ron Paul speaker at the caucus at first would make a great deal of sense, and then you would keep listening, and then he would start to tell a parable about a shepherd and a giant — “These giants, they were real. They dig up their bones every day. They had two rows of teeth. They practiced modern-day sacrifice and cannibalism” — and you would lose the thread.


But at least they showed up at caucuses.


Now what is the Internet going to do with its time?


The best and worst that can be said of Dr. Paul is that he was the candidate of the Internet forum commenter. Internet commenters are brilliant and ruthless by turns. They notice the slightest error in grammar or geography. They engage in long, painstaking harangues on certain recurring themes. They can be cruel. They can be kind. You have the sense that, if they were at dinner with you, they would keep adjusting the silverware and mumbling to themselves, and that they might be startled by the sunlight.


I have a healthy love for Internet commenters. My livelihood depends on them. But not nearly so heavily as Dr. Paul’s livelihood did. (Please don’t vivisect me, commenters! I don’t mean you, personally. You are the exception. Your comments are uniformly well-spelled, completely rational and varied in theme. I was speaking in general.)


Nobody, I mean nobody, had a more vibrant and ruthless Internet presence. Mention Ron Paul, or slightly misspell RuPaul, and suddenly you were deluged with comments from far and wide.


I’m going to miss the awkward moment when, 10 minutes into what I thought was a slow-starting viral video, I noticed that I was watching a Ron Paul ad.


It was almost a chicken-and-egg problem. Was there something about being a Ron Paul supporter that gave you the urge to go hacking your way through the impenetrable underbrush of Internet forums and comment zones? Or was it that the natural impulses of Internet commenters were best expressed by supporting Ron Paul?


One thing all the candidates for president up to this point had in common was the unswerving conviction that the media were not portraying them quite correctly.


But the camp that had this conviction the most loudly was that of Ron Paul. There was a halycon week or so when Jon Stewart noticed. But after that it was all downhill. The Huffington Post billed Paul’s announcement that he was going to stop campaigning under Things You Thought Had Already Happened.


But for someone so neglected, he made a tremendous splash, hoarding up delegates and stockpiling supporters. And every time you mentioned him, the Internet roared.


Everyone always talks about the Obama campaign’s skillful use of social media. But that was all surface, the photogenic Facebook side of the Internet. Ron Paul was all over the traditional forms of anti-social media — the comment boards, the YouTube comments, the caucus crowds. On the surface, nothing changed — a slightly increased delegate total, a few web videos.


And these Internet commenters are like more articulate, better-looking cockroaches — they endure.


I’d say I’d miss them. But no doubt, I will see them in the comments pages. And just wait until 2016.

Read More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/post/w...

Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Gregaj7 2012/05/16 20:22:01
    He is out there like a Stealth Bomber waiting to unleash all his delegates...
    Gregaj7
    +2
    I find ALL the posts of "Ron Paul Quits Campaign" absolutely fascinating and totally incorrect. I'm on the email list and got one from John Tate (Campaign Manager) of one more "money-bomb" for May 17th. It violates campaign rules/laws to raise funds AFTER a candidate suspends/quits their campaigns, and those donations MUST be returned. His campaign shifts gears and everyone that absolutely NEEDS him to 'drop-out' touts that he has, incorrectly, and is lying about it. While lying is "free-speech", it is also morally reprehensible and irresponsible, but that America at this time, just look at the example in DC (militarily-held democracy). Get your facts straight or STHU!!!
  • safari 2012/05/16 20:06:55
    He is gone but not forgotten.....
    safari
    +2
    I won't predict what he will do - but he is definitely NOT forgotten. Nor will his message that stirred mainly our youth die anytime soon.
  • Waldorf 2012/05/16 13:41:36
    He is out there like a Stealth Bomber waiting to unleash all his delegates...
    Waldorf
    +1
    But the trailing comments from Paulbots continue to undermine Romney and the GOP's chances. If Paul is retiring from the GOP, his RINO followers can leave with him or close ranks now and think in terms of defeating Obama.
  • Savior Waldorf 2012/05/16 16:31:45
    Savior
    +2
    Ron Paul is the most fiscally conservative candidate in the race, but I guess it goes to prove conservatives no longer care about fiscal conservatism.
  • Waldorf Savior 2012/05/16 18:45:50
    Waldorf
    +1
    I consider that a false conclusion. It seems to me that the cry is more to defeat Obama and to look for the candidate most likely to do that.
  • BrianD3 Waldorf 2012/05/16 20:06:43
    BrianD3
    at this point, yes
  • Savior Waldorf 2012/05/17 02:49:55
    Savior
    And you think Mitt Romney, who's been on all sides of almost every issue, is the candidate to do that?
  • Waldorf Savior 2012/05/17 16:08:41
    Waldorf
    +1
    Whoever the GOP picks and behind whom we all close ranks, is the candidate to do that. This person certainly appears to be Romney.
  • WannaBeRSC the Contrarian SOB 2012/05/16 12:08:50
    He is out there like a Stealth Bomber waiting to unleash all his delegates...
    WannaBeRSC the Contrarian SOB
    +1
    Stealth Bomber, baby. It's about time for a Daisy Cutter or MOAB, imho.
  • WannaBe... WannaBe... 2012/05/16 12:10:07
    WannaBeRSC the Contrarian SOB
    +1
    I'd also like to know why SH isn't counting my "vote"?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/04/20 21:08:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals