Romney: Who nominated this guy again?
kir
2012/07/05 13:37:39
|
|
|||||
|
5 votes
|
|
14% | |||
|
26 votes
|
|
72% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
14% | |||
Seriously this man is so similar to Obama on so many issues that I figured even the Republicans would be smart enough to pick a better candidate. I guess Republicans want a candidate who is willing to push for carbon caps on a global scale, raise taxes using health care mandates, etc.
Read More: http://politicoid.blogspot.com/2012/07/mittbama.html
Top Opinion
-
irish -liberty or death! 2012/07/05 14:44:58I didn't nominate him
+9and neither did the people of this country! so who is behind the push for this bland puppet?
Do you deny that Romney admitted he would support cap and trade on a global level?
Do you deny that Romney used money taken from the private sector to selectively give loans and grants to green energy programs?
Do you deny that Romney used the same excuse as Obama when pushing the mandate in his home state and that he even called Ted Kennedy his collaborator on the issue?
Romney did not use tax dollars for investments so I do not care where he and others invest their own money - I guess you think that private investments should be controlled by the government or maybe a select few who will decide.
And only the really dim do not understand the difference between a State and the fed - It is impossible to even reason with people who think they are the same.
The hate and divisiveness from you guys is as bad as progressives, maybe worse in every way. I have often said that I cannot hate my country or people enough to be a progressive; unfortunately, I must now extend it to you guys
Romney did not invest using his own tax dollars; he invested using tax money taken from utilities and their customers.
Oh believe me I understand the difference between the state and the federal government, and what can be done on the state level is not what can be done on the federal level, but don't be mistaken by thinking that what can be done on the state level is what should be done by the state.
Kind of like there is no difference between Romney and 0bama, both are puppets who agree on everything and are owned by the same Banksters.
Honestly you're asking me to decide whether I'm going to get shot in my right leg or my left leg. I'm going to continue to demand that I not be shot.
http://politicoid.blogspot.co...
Basically not being invested in a party to the point of death is not intransigence; it's a rational way of thinking.
Romney's are Romney's: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/b...
http://dictionary.reference.c...
Let me be clear: I voted for Romney in the primary and I will vote for him in November. I will vote for him because, after lengthy research, I find his positives far out weigh any of his negatives.
I would never vote for Paul because, after lengthy research and having lived in Texas for many years, I find him unethical, a racist and anti-semite with nothing to offer beyond rhetoric which is what we have now. He is carried on a wave of young folks who prefer rhetoric as we saw with the last election. Johnson is a good man but will likely never be president - I would like to see him be part of an administration some where; I do think he has some things to offer. He simply did not catch on with the bulk of the voters.
I would never vote for Obama and did not because he , like Paul, sells high blown rhetoric with no substance in their backgrounds at all - men without accomplishment, without leadership experience, without management experience and any pattern of success in their past.
Yes I do pay attention to the past performance and am realistic as to what it means. This time it means I will vote for the very best candidate with proven credentials and good character. It means I will vote for Romney.
Now I am done - I keep ...
Let me be clear: I voted for Romney in the primary and I will vote for him in November. I will vote for him because, after lengthy research, I find his positives far out weigh any of his negatives.
I would never vote for Paul because, after lengthy research and having lived in Texas for many years, I find him unethical, a racist and anti-semite with nothing to offer beyond rhetoric which is what we have now. He is carried on a wave of young folks who prefer rhetoric as we saw with the last election. Johnson is a good man but will likely never be president - I would like to see him be part of an administration some where; I do think he has some things to offer. He simply did not catch on with the bulk of the voters.
I would never vote for Obama and did not because he , like Paul, sells high blown rhetoric with no substance in their backgrounds at all - men without accomplishment, without leadership experience, without management experience and any pattern of success in their past.
Yes I do pay attention to the past performance and am realistic as to what it means. This time it means I will vote for the very best candidate with proven credentials and good character. It means I will vote for Romney.
Now I am done - I keep trying to avoid Paul stuff because it is so negative and inspired by hate - your question did not sound that way so I answered. I will not respond again.
Have a good day
You're right that he most likely never will be President but that's more because of people in both the Republican and the Democrat party that are so invested in the continuation of the corrupt machine.
Seriously you owe Kir an apology.