More like exploiters.
The vast majority of people that take government assistance should be earning their own way instead of taking the earnings of others.
But it is easier to vote for Democrats than actually working so the collapse of our economy will continue.
Romney Thinks That Obama Supporters Are 'Victims' Who Rely on Government Handouts: Is He Right?
Chris D
2012/09/18 17:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
645 votes
|
|
29% | |||
|
1,410 votes
|
|
63% | |||
|
187 votes
|
|
8% | |||
Romney has gone and done it again. The Republican presidential candidate called 47 percent of Americans "victims" for supporting President Obama in a recent video of him talking at a private fundraiser.
Romney thinks Obama supporters are living off of state handouts, and he is probably right for about 10-15 percent of them... but it's that other 85-90 percent of Democrats that go to work and participate in the economy that he should be trying to get to vote for him! Insulting potential voters is most likely not the wisest strategy, and you know Obama will be all over this in the debates. Remember Regan Democrats? That's what he needs to win. Good luck with this one, Mittens.
NEWS.YAHOO.COM reports:

Romney thinks Obama supporters are living off of state handouts, and he is probably right for about 10-15 percent of them... but it's that other 85-90 percent of Democrats that go to work and participate in the economy that he should be trying to get to vote for him! Insulting potential voters is most likely not the wisest strategy, and you know Obama will be all over this in the debates. Remember Regan Democrats? That's what he needs to win. Good luck with this one, Mittens.
NEWS.YAHOO.COM reports:
Mitt Romney stood by his comments captured on a hidden camera at a closed-door fundraiser earlier this year in which he called supporters of President Barack Obama "victims" and said they are reliant on government handouts. In a hastily arranged news conference Monday night, he called his words "off the cuff" and "not elegantly stated."

Read More: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-stands-c...
Top Opinion
-
Heisenberg 2012/09/18 17:03:31Partially






















1984
Romney accepts an offer to head up a new corporate investment firm
1986
Romney follows other venture capital firms and makes an initial investment in Staples, Inc.
1986
Romney leads the purchase of Accuride, a wheel and rim maker, investing $5M of the $200M price
1988
Romney’s firm sells Accuride after “shedding unproductive labor,” pocketing more than $120M (Romney cost many Americans their jobs)
1988
Romney directs the purchase of hundreds of small clothing stores, combines them to form Stage Stores (Romney put many small business owners out of business)
1989
Romney’s firm sells the bulk of its stock in Staples for more than $13M
1989
Romney moves away from investing in start-ups, instead focusing on buy-outs
1989
Romney and his investors purchase a stake in Damon Corp.
1991
Romney is named CEO of Bain & Company, the consulting firm, while remaining head of Bain Capital
1993
Romney negotiates a $10M bailout from a federal agency to save Bain & Co. from bankruptcy (it only took him two years as head for Bain & Co to go bankrupt)
1993
Romney’s firm buys GST Steel in Kansas City, MO
1994
Romney’s firm leads a buyout of Dade International, investing $30M of the $415M purchase price
1994
Romney runs for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts; he loses the race and continues in the priva...
1984
Romney accepts an offer to head up a new corporate investment firm
1986
Romney follows other venture capital firms and makes an initial investment in Staples, Inc.
1986
Romney leads the purchase of Accuride, a wheel and rim maker, investing $5M of the $200M price
1988
Romney’s firm sells Accuride after “shedding unproductive labor,” pocketing more than $120M (Romney cost many Americans their jobs)
1988
Romney directs the purchase of hundreds of small clothing stores, combines them to form Stage Stores (Romney put many small business owners out of business)
1989
Romney’s firm sells the bulk of its stock in Staples for more than $13M
1989
Romney moves away from investing in start-ups, instead focusing on buy-outs
1989
Romney and his investors purchase a stake in Damon Corp.
1991
Romney is named CEO of Bain & Company, the consulting firm, while remaining head of Bain Capital
1993
Romney negotiates a $10M bailout from a federal agency to save Bain & Co. from bankruptcy (it only took him two years as head for Bain & Co to go bankrupt)
1993
Romney’s firm buys GST Steel in Kansas City, MO
1994
Romney’s firm leads a buyout of Dade International, investing $30M of the $415M purchase price
1994
Romney runs for U.S. Senate in Massachusetts; he loses the race and continues in the private sector
1995
Romney’s firm acquires a stake in Cambridge Industries, a Michigan-based auto parts supplier
1996
Damon Corp. pleads guilty to Medicare fraud it committed while Romney served as a director (As director, he had to have at least known about the medicare fraud)
1996
Romney’s firm purchases Dynamic Circuits which, after another acquisition, becomes DDi Corp.
1999
Mitt Romney accepts a position as head of the Salt Lake Olympics, but retains ownership of his firm
1999
Romney continues to provide input on investments and key personnel decision.
2000
Stage Stores declares bankruptcy (Another company of his went belly up)
2000
After 450 jobs cut and $330 million in debt, Cambridge Industries files for bankruptcy (More unemployed Americans and another company Romney flushed down the toilet)
2001
SMTC begins cutting production in the U.S., shipping American jobs to Mexico (Even more unemployed Americans)
2001
Romney’s firm closes the Kansas City GST Steel plant, costing 750 workers their jobs (And even more unemployed Americans!)
2001
Romney announces he will transfer his 100% control of his firm to other managing directors
2002
Dade International declares bankruptcy, and thousands of jobs are lost (Do I need to repeat myself again?)
2002
Romney announces he will run for governor
2003
$60 million: Romney raised a gas tax by 400% to raise taxes by $60 million each year. (He raised gas tax by FOUR HUNDRED PERCENT)
2004
$8 billion: Romney proposed adding an additional $8 billion in long-term debt to Massachusetts.
2005
$930 million: Under Romney, state spending increased by $930 million in 2005.
2006
47th out of 50: Over Romney’s term, Massachusetts fell to 47th out of 50 states in job creation. (Unemployed Americans everywhere, thanks to Romney)
2007
$1 billion: Romney leaves Massachusetts with a budget deficit of $1 billion.
Having a job is not the end-all-be-all of everything. Do you think the USA would be a great country if half the people were employed burying dollar bills somewhere and the other half was employed in digging them back up? Although that would be full employment, nothing would be gained.
How many typewriter repairmen have lost their jobs thanks Intel, Compaq, etc.? Is that a BAD thing?
thats the wonders of how our economy has always been successful
What collossaly stupid statement. He didn't throw you out of YOUR job right, so he A-OK with you. You are a sub-moronic selfish prick.
I like his ambition.......most of us could use some ambition....we wouldn't be complaning about... why is so and so rish and not me...boo hoo..
I know he can clean house he is very organized and humble and gives to the right charities...
The Romney list should not be used to excuse Barracks failures... HE IS THE SO CALLED PRESIDENT ... that is what matters....there was no change....just GOLF and parties....bad decisions that have brought us more enemies. HE IS NOT A LEADER.
SAY NO! to 4 more years of a President that has nothing to show for his ignorance.
He was never quailifed to lead.
.instead he is going to take half your paycheck or however monies and give it to the others sitting at home watching Hollywood and eating bon bons ..
.getting obese from this bad routine.... and then he will take more monies from you to pay their doctor/hospital bills.
Did you know 47% of illegals are on welfare? Key word ILLEGAL, and if you don't feel victimized because your money is being used to help illegals who haven't paid into anything, let alone they don't belong here, and they cut your benefits that you paid into, then I don't know what to say actually.
Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.
Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh.
Mark 12:41-44 He sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. 42 A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. 43 Then he called his disciples and said to them, "Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. 44 For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on."
Matthew 25:34-36 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry ...
Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.
Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh.
Mark 12:41-44 He sat down opposite the treasury, and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. 42 A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. 43 Then he called his disciples and said to them, "Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. 44 For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on."
Matthew 25:34-36 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me."
Luke 14:12-14 He said also to the one who had invited him, "When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, in case they may invite you in return, and you would be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind. And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous."
RobMe wants to be President not do the job of President.
Four years after Barack Obama's historic election as president, little seems to have changed for the African-American communities on Chicago's South Side.
The lack of change -- or the sense that these neighborhoods are getting worse -- is eroding the president's standing among African-Americans in his hometown.
In 2011, Chicago suffered the third-highest black jobless rate among the nation's major metropolitan areas, at 19 percent, according to the liberal Economic Policy Institute.
Chicago still lacks enough affordable housing. Not only did the city demolish 25,000 public housing units in the previous decade, it also experienced more than 80,000 foreclosures, mainly in low-income neighborhoods.
Chicago "black nationalist" Eddie Read contends Obama has never fought for the black community. "I would not honestly tag Obama as a fighter for black people, black agenda or black issues," Read told The Washington Examiner.
After Obama's election, Read said, "I hoped that it would change."
But four years later, as he looks around Chicago's neighborhoods, he said things haven't improved under Obama.
"I don't see where the quality of life or the quality has changed," he said, "except that it's worse."
Dr. Conrad Worrill is an African-American educator, activist and...
Four years after Barack Obama's historic election as president, little seems to have changed for the African-American communities on Chicago's South Side.
The lack of change -- or the sense that these neighborhoods are getting worse -- is eroding the president's standing among African-Americans in his hometown.
In 2011, Chicago suffered the third-highest black jobless rate among the nation's major metropolitan areas, at 19 percent, according to the liberal Economic Policy Institute.
Chicago still lacks enough affordable housing. Not only did the city demolish 25,000 public housing units in the previous decade, it also experienced more than 80,000 foreclosures, mainly in low-income neighborhoods.
Chicago "black nationalist" Eddie Read contends Obama has never fought for the black community. "I would not honestly tag Obama as a fighter for black people, black agenda or black issues," Read told The Washington Examiner.
After Obama's election, Read said, "I hoped that it would change."
But four years later, as he looks around Chicago's neighborhoods, he said things haven't improved under Obama.
"I don't see where the quality of life or the quality has changed," he said, "except that it's worse."
Dr. Conrad Worrill is an African-American educator, activist and former radio talk show host on Chicago's African-American-oriented station WVON. He told the Examiner that Obama was an inspirational speaker who moved people. But in the end, he became just another Chicago politician.
"His rise in politics, his trajectory in politics has led him to make adjustments in his political decision-making. And that's the case with many politicians. So he's no different from many others in that regard. He's a politician," Worrill said.
Cheryl Johnson and her mother, Hazel, lived in the economically deprived Altgeld Gardens housing project when young Obama was a community organizer there. Her late mother also was an organizer at the housing complex and often welcomed Obama into her kitchen.
"He's everybody's president," Cheryl Johnson told the Examiner, saying she is proud she knows him. But has he made a difference? "We, as poor people, don't feel it and don't see it," she said. Read believes Obama's problem is that he does not understand the unique needs of Chicago blacks.
"Obama came through Chicago through Saul Alinsky organizing," he said. "The Alinsky piece seemed to have had an agenda about what it thought was in the best interest of black folks, from the white liberal perspective."
Obama instead allied himself with Chicago's MacArthur Foundation, local housing nonprofits and real estate developers. Valerie Jarrett and Allison Davis, Martin Nesbitt and Tony Rezko -- all Obama friends -- were at the epicenter of that powerful coalition.
Obama's low-income-housing campaign still resonates among Chicago's poor today. Deborah Taylor, a public housing tenant in the Kenwood section of Chicago, also told the Examiner things are as bad as ever for poor tenants.
"The residents at the end of the day still suffer here," she said. "A lot of times a lot of people start out idealistically thinking they are helping," Taylor said.
"I don't think any of them are in favor of the tenants," she said. "Everybody's in it for the money. It's all about profit now. So the residents lose, lose, lose."
D'Anna Carter, a neighborhood activist in Chicago's Woodlawn section, singled out the Habitat Co., which was run by Jarrett, now Obama's closest White House adviser.
"They were never interested in poor people," she told the Examiner. "They would sell poor people a bill of goods," she said bitterly in an interview.
Wardell Lavender has been a Woodlawn resident since 1951. His was the first black family to move into the neighborhood. He also blames Habitat.
"Habitat was bad landlords at the time. They didn't care too much about the blacks," he told the Examiner.
According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the enticement to the poor to buy condos they could not afford caused widespread losses in Chicago.
Foreclosures fell hard on Chicago's poor residents. The Urban Institute reported in May 2009 that most were displaced or homeless, credit ratings were damaged and violence increased as empty units remained vacant.
Worrill said he still supports Obama but adds that the lack of progress in Chicago's black community is palpable.
"He has been supported, but the position he's in now, he's in a heck of a predicament."
http://washingtonexaminer.com...
By the way everybody needs to help.
and last i heard Obama gave 1% to charity... and Biden $350... for their salaries thats what one would call greed... and might I add he is playing the record games of golf any president has played and vacationing almost every month... all of this at the taxpayers' expense
major relations in foreign relations... yeah the Arab Spring looks so wonderful now
more realisitic approach to defense... he is breaking international laws with drone strikes all over the middle east
federal gov't on education... everyone with a brain knows that education is not reserved for the federal level... that is all to be reserved at the state level
reoriented view to the technical fields... hmm last I recall he stopped the manned space exploration program and is cutting NASA funding... one of the leaders in science research
increase the strength of the middle class and fight poverty... hmm last I saw we have record pverty rates today and the middle class has still been shrinking to nonexistant levels
give ma an actual credible source instead of some blog made by someone
when you stonewall a Congressional investigation about Fast and Furious that is not national security... that is a lack of transparency... unless letting guns walk across the border without no traces on them has a national security issue behind the story
when you start using drone strikes in other countries without approval of using them that is interfering with a country's sovereignty and against international law... especially when we go into another country's territory and kill someone without their notification and approval...
whats laughable is that obama is saying before his presidential campaign in 2008 that we would be out of these wars in a matter of a year or two... 4 years later we transferred a good portion of soldiers from iraq to afghanistan (even when obama said shortly after being elected he would take out over half the troops from afghanistan and iraq out by may 2010 but only increased deployment)... and the whole plan of being out of afghanistan by 2014... that was set up by bush not obama he is just going along with the plan...
so if the plan to decrease NASA funding by Bush is set before Obama in president... why is Obama going along with the plan if he feels a need f...
when you stonewall a Congressional investigation about Fast and Furious that is not national security... that is a lack of transparency... unless letting guns walk across the border without no traces on them has a national security issue behind the story
when you start using drone strikes in other countries without approval of using them that is interfering with a country's sovereignty and against international law... especially when we go into another country's territory and kill someone without their notification and approval...
whats laughable is that obama is saying before his presidential campaign in 2008 that we would be out of these wars in a matter of a year or two... 4 years later we transferred a good portion of soldiers from iraq to afghanistan (even when obama said shortly after being elected he would take out over half the troops from afghanistan and iraq out by may 2010 but only increased deployment)... and the whole plan of being out of afghanistan by 2014... that was set up by bush not obama he is just going along with the plan...
so if the plan to decrease NASA funding by Bush is set before Obama in president... why is Obama going along with the plan if he feels a need for high technological investments in this country? if he felt a need to keep science going along he could have fought to keep NASA funding but he easily went along with it
yeah NASA continues to launch UNMANNED projects into space, the majority of them just orbiting our planet... there is no new plans to have a MANNED mission go past the means of orbiting or going to the space station
and if the claim of outsourcing to Russia is false then why do we have to send our astronauts to Russia to jump on ship to go to the space station?