Quantcast

Romney picks Ron Paul as running mate?

Doc 2012/06/08 19:17:21
Related Topics: Ron Paul, Ticket, Romney, Vote
You!
Add Photos & Videos

I think that would be a great idea!

What do you think?


Would the RP supporters vote for this ticket?

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • gregaj7 2012/06/09 03:37:16
    Other idea! please explain
    gregaj7
    +7
    Highly unlikely since the Bilderberg Group, which is membershipped by most of the world's Elitists, would prefer Ron Paul's vital-signs at less-than-zero.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • joseph ... stormy rae 2012/06/11 19:55:28
  • Doc joseph ... 2012/06/12 18:03:53
    Doc
    Did you block old Salt?
  • joseph ... Doc 2012/06/12 19:43:01
  • Doc joseph ... 2012/06/13 14:21:51
    Doc
    He's never mentioned you to me.

    And I can't imagine why anyone would be mean to you, as sweet-tempered and pleasant as you are. :-)
  • joseph ... Doc 2012/06/13 18:53:15
  • Doc joseph ... 2012/06/15 18:35:27
    Doc
    And lefties always believe they know what's best for everyone else. That is, unless they have to play by the same rules.

    But of course, you've never called anyone a foul name, have you?
  • Doc Old Salt 2012/06/12 18:03:25
    Doc
    LOL!

    But in no way is RP as dumb as biden.

    Thanks for the answer
  • Atmara 2012/06/09 01:38:55
    Other idea! please explain
    Atmara
    +4
    I pick non of the above
  • Rich Ma... Atmara 2012/06/09 03:38:55 (edited)
    Rich Matarese
    +2
    Hell, if only we were ALLOWED to pick "none of the above."

    Think about leaving the White House empty for four solid years. All legislation inescapably subject to "pocket veto" (i.e,, neither signature nor send-back; Congress' enactments simply sit on a dusty desk and die). No U.S. Supreme Court appointments.

    No G7 meetings. Let 'em get along without us. No U.N. ambassador. No U.N. dues payments. All U.S. military actions overseas simply peter out as the result of no orders to continue or extend missions.

    The call sign "Air Force One" is retired for the duration. "Hail to the Chief" isn't played at any time, anywhere, for four years.

    Hasn't Odumbo proven that HAVING a President is a goddam disaster?

    I'd sure as hell vote "None of the above."
  • Doc Rich Ma... 2012/06/12 18:04:40
    Doc
    And the US would prosper
  • Doc Atmara 2012/06/12 18:04:15
    Doc
    Thanks for the answer.
  • Rodney 2012/06/09 01:38:34
    Other idea! please explain
    Rodney
    +4
    It might help to not have the vote split and give Romney some of the Foreign Policy insight he is weak on.
  • Doc Rodney 2012/06/12 18:05:04
    Doc
    +1
    That's kind of what I was thinking.
    Thanks, Rodney
  • hazel 2012/06/09 01:31:43
    Other idea! please explain
    hazel
    +2
    I sure hope not..I dont see him making a good vice PRESIDENT ..WE NEED RUBIO
  • Rich Ma... hazel 2012/06/09 01:53:56
    Rich Matarese
    +2
    Sorry, but you can't HAVE Rubio. Article 2, Section 1. Not a natural born citizen.

    Of course, neither is our Kenyan Keynesian, but you friggin' "establishment" Republicans have been shoving your heads up your butts for five years on that matter, too.
  • hazel Rich Ma... 2012/06/09 01:56:53
    hazel
    +4
    SILLY PERSON
  • Doc Rich Ma... 2012/06/12 18:06:27
    Doc
    Does that apply to vice-presidents?
  • Doc hazel 2012/06/12 18:05:38
    Doc
    Thanks for the answer.

    Just curious, do you see a place for RP in the cabinet?
  • flrdsgns hazel 2012/06/16 03:31:32
    flrdsgns
    Rubio is going nowhere, He's a big deal with the Cubans, but will never win anything outside of Florida
  • ehrhornp 2012/06/09 01:27:46
    Other idea! please explain
    ehrhornp
    +3
    Wouldn't make any difference to me. I will still vote for Obama as I don't want the country going back to the days of G W Bush and I am against subsidizing the rich.
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/09 01:40:36
    Rodney
    +2
    So subsidizing the corporations, cronies, foreign powers and everyone else except the American people is okay with you?
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/09 02:05:19
    ehrhornp
    +2
    That was being done under the Bush administration and would definitely be done under a Romney administration. Love someone who can only improve job creation by 4%. Wonder if that should be Mitt's motto. Mitt the 4% president. He will improve job creation by 4%. Think it will catch on?
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/09 02:28:02
    Rodney
    +2
    Then we can call Barry the 3/4 of 1% Job Creator. He's already the Food Stamp President.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/09 02:37:34 (edited)
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/09 03:02:13
    Rodney
    +2
    Trying to deflect now are we? I gave you the official annualized job growth percentage from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that shows Barry rate of success is a pitiful 3/4 of 1% in NEW jobs created while he has been president. You haven't shown me where you got the Mitt Romney figures and instead divert to Bush/Obama comparison. Bush is no longer president and isn't running.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/09 03:16:12
    ehrhornp
    You obviously didn't read the links. lol Go back and read them then talk to me. It is ridiculous to hold Obama for the free fall that the economy was in when he took office. But I will take Obama's numbers over gW's numbers any day. Nice to know you now hold GW responsible for 9/11. lol
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/09 03:19:52
    Rodney
    +2
    This poll is about Romney. I see no sense in play your GW versus BHO game. If you have something relevant to the idea of Romney picking Ron Paul as a VP, we can discuss it.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/09 15:39:47
    ehrhornp
    bye
  • Doc Rodney 2012/06/12 18:08:43
    Doc
    +2
    Another win for Rodney.
  • Doc ehrhornp 2012/06/12 18:08:27
    Doc
    +2
    Rodney wins this debate.
  • ehrhornp Doc 2012/06/12 18:18:14
    ehrhornp
    keep supporting socialism for the rich. It worked so well last time. Are you related to Bin by the way? You both support policies that weakens America.
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/12 23:20:07
    Rodney
    +2
    LOL, socialism for the rich? It's Barry and his crew of Chit-cago political thugs who are pushing for socialism. Socialized medicine, Taking over businesses and screwing the investors and giving the bulk of those companies to unions, pressing for and getting new bank regulations that are killing the small banks while the big banks buy up the smaller ones at a record pace, failed policies on the domestic front that is allowing his rich buddies to buy up homes at depressed prices making them richer when the market rebounds. Yes, Barry is the one killing the middle class and enriching further his high rolling cronies.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/12 23:23:46
    ehrhornp
    I agree that Obama is advocating for traditional socialism, the redistribution of wealth to take care of the less advantaged. But Mitt is for the redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the very wealthy. Now why would you be for that?
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/12 23:51:02
    Rodney
    +2
    How do you explain that in the last 3 years poverty in the US has risen to 52 year highs. Home Ownership has dropped to lows not seen since 1965 (62% own a home and most of them are underwater on them). Middle Class Net Worth has dropped 40% since Barry came to office.

    Don't roll out that tired old "Bush's Fault" crap. Barry has been in office 3 1/2 years and 2 of those with full control of both houses of Congress. Meanwhile, the unions have come out on top and prospered,the rich have gotten richer and we have the most divided country we have ever had.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/13 00:39:03
    ehrhornp
    Dah, what do you expect to have happened when the economy was run off a cliff? If Mitt gets in, watch the middle class fall some more. You can believe it is not GW's fault, I don't care. Those who don't listen to history are doomed to keep repeating its mistakes. How come most economic crashes have happened under republican leadership?
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/13 00:58:51
    Rodney
    +1
    LOL, little do you know, in every economic model there is, there are cycles. It is what is done with those down turns that matters. Bush inherited one and brought us out of it, Clinton inherited one and brought us out of it, Reagan inherited a bigger mess then this and brought us out of it. Barry is an incompetent, inexperience pseudo intellectual academic who should stay out of politics until he has gained some experience in the private sector (that doesn't mean suckling at the public teet).
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/13 01:10:35
    ehrhornp
    lol, GW inherited an economy in which the federal budget was balanced, the country was largely at peace and the economy was while not perfect was relatively healthy. GW immediately ruined this by ignoring his daily briefing memos and allowing Bin to attack us, running two wars off budget, and giving tax cuts during a time of war. Can you name a previous president who gave tax cuts during a time of war? Yet for some reason people think republicans are fiscally conservative? What a joke.

    Clinton inherited a mess and have you forgotten passed the largest tax increase in the history of this country. A tax increase phony conservatives predicted would crash the economy. Didn't happen, in fact didn't happen until Clinton left office and GW started socialism for the rich.

    Reagan inherited a fairly decent economy. Inflation was being cured which allowed for good growth. Shame you don't really know what is going on or the hatred republicans have exhibited towards this president.

    Now that the stock market is on the rise again, I am glad we have Obama as president instead of a president who would be working to get the Dow under 5000.
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/13 01:45:50
    Rodney
    +1
    LOL, right, and the Dot Com crash never happened. Eight months of recession. The tax increase of 1993 was far from the largest, in percentage of increase or in revenue raised and was a drag on GDP. BTW, it was the tax DECREASE of 1997 and a frugal republican congress that led to the surplus.
  • ehrhornp Rodney 2012/06/13 16:21:12
    ehrhornp
    Excuses excuses. Fact is that under your hero G W Bush the stock market closed lower on his final day than on his first day. This is an accomplishment for a two term president. But vote for a socialist for the rich. He will gladly take money from the middle class to finance his pals.
  • Rodney ehrhornp 2012/06/13 20:49:00 (edited)
    Rodney
    +1
    Yeah and Barry's term is not yet done. With his less then masterful handling of the economy I am willing to bet he will repeat Georgie's performance.
    (Edit) You realize your terminology is incoherent and nonsensical. Socialist for the rich? hahaha The truth is Barry has been destroying the middle class at a rate never seen in modern history. Middle income is down 39% in these past 3 years, Middle Class slipping into poverty is at record levels, welfare programs are bursting at the seams and home ownership is back down to levels not seen since 1965.

    SO...take your Socialist Obama loving butt and hike on down the trail Bucko!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 21:04:03

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals