Quantcast

Romney Likes Mandate on Health care

Mopeder 2012/07/06 09:24:24
Related Topics: Health Care, Romney, Health
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Patent1 2012/07/08 19:30:22
    Patent1
    Of course Romney likes Romneycare. So does the Heritage Foundation. They initially suggested the individual mandate to Romney. They were for it before they were against it.
  • LibertyCaroline 2012/07/07 14:21:04
    LibertyCaroline
    Of course Romney likes mandates, he's the other Obama.
  • twocrows 2012/07/06 21:38:18
    twocrows
    So he likes mandates. That's no surprise, since that's the method he used to insure the vast majority in his state. [oh, and, btw - among my friends in Mass - it's the ONLY thing they like about his years in office there. just sayin.]

    BUT - - all that said - - I wonder what happens in Massachusetts if you buy health insurance and then get sick AND YOUR INSURANCE KICKS YOU OFF. does the government pick up the tab?
    or did Romney take away the insurance companies' rights to kick off people who got sick?

    I also wonder what Massachusetts' stand is on preexisting conditions.

    hmmmmmmm - - maybe I need to go back to my friends who live in MA and ask them these questions. still, if anyone here knows the answers, I'd appreciate knowing how these matters are handled there.
  • Call me Mark willya? 2012/07/06 18:56:20
    Call me Mark willya?
    I don't really know much about the candidates themselves except what I read online and I'm not doing that anymore... Tired of political BS. Tired of right wingers trying to bully people and left wingers crying, and both sides whining about what the other is doing... This is supposed to be ONE COUNTRY!!! It was built on religious freedom and compromise, but somewhere along the way we all seem to have forgotten that... I'm done answering Political questions.
  • clasact 2012/07/06 16:56:00
    clasact
    +4
    so now some truth is starting to come out of his mouth and why should we be surprised at this ,I mean he started his health care program before Obama and they are both almost the same so where dose he get off saying he will repeal it
  • TerryAgee 2012/07/06 16:12:02
    TerryAgee
    Good for him!
  • Live Free Or Die 2012/07/06 14:57:45
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    Romney liked the mandate in Massachusetts because they expanded Medicaid with sliding scales to insure people who work, but can't afford insurance. The Supreme Court has upheld the mandate, but not Medicaid expansion. If Romney were smart, he'd point out the flaws in that going forward and put it on the Supreme Court where it belongs. He won't because he has to play the Right Wing base who wants it repealed and not replaced.
  • TimothyBrianFoley 2012/07/06 14:22:25
    TimothyBrianFoley
    +2
    well romney has some nerve unless he wants his plan from massachusetts on a national level then romney should shut up because he passed health care reform as well as obama
  • Live Fr... Timothy... 2012/07/06 15:16:57
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    Romney originally said he wanted to give the states a waiver if they didn't want Obamacare. Well, now he wants to fully repeal and disagrees with the Supreme Court who he initially agreed with. Crazy.
  • gfreeman BN-0 2012/07/06 13:48:08 (edited)
    gfreeman BN-0
    +2
    How is it possible that Romney is already having Reagan moments when he hasn't even be elected yet?
  • JCD aka... gfreema... 2012/07/06 17:14:06
  • Skeptikat 2012/07/06 13:34:49
  • Cunning Stunts 2012/07/06 13:24:05
    Cunning Stunts
    +1
    The USA would have been better off with Romneycare. Both fall short though of universal health care.
  • Glfer65 Cunning... 2012/07/06 15:35:17
    Glfer65
    +1
    Obamacare is from the template of Romneycare. The exact same so why is it different? Mitt supported this when he Gov of Mass and so what, the dems took the idea and now it is bad for us?
  • Cunning... Glfer65 2012/07/06 15:52:56
    Cunning Stunts
    +2
    Romneycare had better coverage for contraception and preexisting conditions.
  • Glfer65 Cunning... 2012/07/06 16:52:01
    Glfer65
    +1
    But both are the same right? They still covered what you said and that is one of the many things we need as a means of caring for ourselves. People like me partial hearing loss at birth is considered a preexisting condition therefore I am a high risk to insurance companies.

    I know they don't covered this just making a point. Fact is people have no control what they are born with yet the insurance companies control the cost. Does it seem fair?
  • Cunning... Glfer65 2012/07/06 19:21:50
    Cunning Stunts
    No it doesn't.

    The major flaw I see with the provate HMO system and even Obamacare is that pre existing conditions will be overlooked as a fiscal negative when in reality they should have just as much weight as any other condition.

    For example if I was American my neurological, mental health and physical issues wouldn't be taken into consideration, just like Cystic Fibrosis, MS, ALS, Muscular dystrophy or CFT.
  • Glfer65 Cunning... 2012/07/06 21:48:48
    Glfer65
    +2
    From what I saw and read preexisting conditions will be covered without the overcharge. Guess we will have to wait and see how it is supposed to pan out. Can I ask what your country has for a system?
  • Cunning... Glfer65 2012/07/06 23:35:46
    Cunning Stunts
    Australia. We have universal healthcare.
  • Glfer65 Cunning... 2012/07/07 03:19:54
    Glfer65
    OK, do you like the system you have? Would you pay for a system like ours no UHC?
  • Live Fr... Glfer65 2012/07/06 23:42:13
    Live Free Or Die
    He's trying to say pre-existing conditions won't be covered, but that's not what the law says.
  • Glfer65 Live Fr... 2012/07/07 03:19:17
    Glfer65
    +1
    You are correct it will be covered.
  • Live Fr... Glfer65 2012/07/07 03:31:48
    Live Free Or Die
    Yup.
  • JCD aka... Glfer65 2012/07/06 17:13:21
    JCD aka "biz"
    Exactly.
  • Live Fr... Cunning... 2012/07/06 15:59:25
    Live Free Or Die
    I think you're right, but too bad Romney wants to repeal it instead of fix it.
  • Schläue~© 2012/07/06 11:35:42
    Schläue~©
    +2
    In fall 2005 the House and Senate each passed health care insurance reform bills. The legislature made a number of changes to Governor Romney's original proposal, including expanding MassHealth (Medicaid and SCHIP) coverage to low-income children and restoring funding for public health programs. The most controversial change was the addition of a provision which requires firms with 11 or more workers that do not provide "fair and reasonable" health coverage to their workers to pay an annual penalty. This contribution, initially $295 annually per worker, is intended to equalize the free care pool charges imposed on employers who do and do not cover their workers.

    On April 12, 2006, Governor Mitt Romney signed the health legislation. Romney vetoed eight sections of the health care legislation, (pay attention here)

    ................ including the controversial employer assessment.

    Romney also vetoed provisions providing dental benefits to poor residents on the Medicaid program, and providing health coverage to senior and disabled legal immigrants not eligible for federal Medicaid. The legislature promptly overrode six of the eight gubernatorial section vetoes, on May 4, 2006, and by mid-June 2006 had overridden the remaining two.
  • JCD aka... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 11:40:48
    JCD aka "biz"
    +3
    Thank you for the interesting information.

    So Mitt "tax credit" Romney did not believe that poor people need teeth?
  • Schläue~© JCD aka... 2012/07/06 11:58:56
    Schläue~©
    You do understand that giving businesses incentives to stay or relocate to your state keeps the population employed and benefits everyone... correct? oops, guess not.

    Where does one draw the line with wiping people's asses for them? Where is it written that the state or federal govt. is supposed to provide every conceivable service for free? Besides, any emergency work is still available.

    Now, go brush your tooth.
  • JCD aka... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 12:05:35
    JCD aka "biz"
    +5
    LOL

    Funny thing, and you know it, is that all countries which have universal health care, and public insurance, spend a lot LESS on health care than America with its notorious for-profit "health" insurance mafia.

    Don't forget to mow Romney's lawn to day, he plans to come and have a look at his Bermuda holdings (Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors Ltd).
  • Schläue~© JCD aka... 2012/07/06 12:34:59 (edited)
    Schläue~©
    Correct.... we also have 15 million tort cases filed every year in the USA by trial lawyers with the preponderance of those cases involving medical insurance companies.
    Doctors & hospitals are forced to carry outrageous amounts of malpractice insurance which gets passed directly onto the consumers and increases costs for everyone.

    The totals per capita reflect those costs and awards, insurance companies pay for multi-million dollar lawsuit without caps.
    The progs bitch about doctors ordering unnecessary tests to cover their butt and in the same breath turn around and sue those same doctors for not having a crystal ball. Can't have it both ways.

    Regardless, 0bozoTax will be repealed in it's entirety long before the jan. 2014 disaster is scheduled to kick in and the replacement package will be a REAL health-care reform bill and not an insurance & tax bill.

    I can't mow the lawn today because the air conditioning system is being serviced.

    Air
  • Live Fr... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 15:19:38
    Live Free Or Die
    TORT reform is not that easy when you consider that there are real malpractice cases that people have a right to sue for. But it's not to say it can't be done and shouldn't be done.

    But as to your assertion that he will replace it with a REAL health-care reform bill and not an insurance and tax bill, you're dreaming.
  • Schläue~© Live Fr... 2012/07/06 16:00:24
    Schläue~©
    +1
    Of course it will have to 'address' insurance because that is the unfortunate system we have created. However, it can be done without imposing any additional taxes and the replacement will be geared towards lowering costs and improving the availability and quality of care.

    Insurance used to be for unforeseen calamity and now it's abused as a maintenance program. The $787 Billion stimulus package should have set aside about $200 Billion to construct low-cost walk-in clinics throughout the U.S.
    They would have provided a cheap place for people to go instead of using the ER's for common colds, bumps & bruises.
    They could have been locally owned and operated (buildings and equipment leased through the govt.) by an established MD in the area providing places for new doctors to work as interns.
    It would have been a multi-purpose solution for many problems we faced in Jan. 2009 providing jobs in dozens of occupations and been a huge step towards affordable routine health-care for all.

    There are many legitimate malpractice lawsuits and those should not be affected by tort reform and putting reasonable caps on awards.
    I would like to see a reform that held attorney's, plaintiffs, and 'expert witnesses' criminally liable with mandatory prison sentences for bringing and or pursuing a bogus lawsuit.
  • Live Fr... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 16:33:15
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    I understand it can be and will be a hardship to small businesses to insure their employees due to the cost or tax them if they can't afford to, but repeal is not likely as a health tax contribution to the overall cost of health care has been deemed Constitutional. So I support cost/analysis over repeal. Here is the link that shows the effect Romneycare has had and what effect Obamacare will have on small businesses if you have the time (if not that is okay too): http://www.masslive.com/polit...

    I agree with some of your ideas, but not others to reform. The Republicans, however, have no ideas and no good ideas to insure most Americans, as was done in Massachusetts.

    If I were in charge, I would have expanded access to Medicaid on a sliding scale to the states as was done in my state. You don't have to be poor to receive care. You can be working and just not have access to employee coverage or be unable to afford what's being offered. It's a good plan, but it does require some tax base from businesses. Most of them have adjusted. But it looks like there may be some issues in the Obamacare plan going forward, especially in the medical device industry here in Mass. as was shown in the link I found, interestingly. Anyway, fix not repeal is the answer. I hope Mitt catches on.
  • Schläue~© Live Fr... 2012/07/06 17:02:52
    Schläue~©
    The entire premise of this plan was to collapse the system on purpose giving them the crisis they needed to call for a National Emergency and install the single -payer universal plan they wanted all along.
    This entire process has been a scam 10X than what ANY news agency is talking about.

    Paul Ryan NAILED it right in front of 0bozo & Joey over two yeas ago and surgically dissected the lies in 6 short minutes. This is a must see.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    By the fact that this didn't alter the Constitution in any way..... it can and will be repealed by being replaced it with another bill which contains that exact wording to supersede any and all parts of the PPACA.
    It is done every day in Congress where new law essentially nullifies old law in part or completely.

    It makes no difference that it was deemed Constitutional as a tax by the SCOTUS because they don't write tax laws or any other legislation, only rule on them.

    There is no such thing as a law or even a Constitutional article or amendment that's etched in stone for all time.

    ANYTHING can be altered by Congress and 3/4 of the state's approval and the process doesn't involve the sitting President whatsoever.

    This is a lengthy read but it shows exactly what went on behind the scenes and how this so-called health-care reform ha...

    The entire premise of this plan was to collapse the system on purpose giving them the crisis they needed to call for a National Emergency and install the single -payer universal plan they wanted all along.
    This entire process has been a scam 10X than what ANY news agency is talking about.

    Paul Ryan NAILED it right in front of 0bozo & Joey over two yeas ago and surgically dissected the lies in 6 short minutes. This is a must see.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    By the fact that this didn't alter the Constitution in any way..... it can and will be repealed by being replaced it with another bill which contains that exact wording to supersede any and all parts of the PPACA.
    It is done every day in Congress where new law essentially nullifies old law in part or completely.

    It makes no difference that it was deemed Constitutional as a tax by the SCOTUS because they don't write tax laws or any other legislation, only rule on them.

    There is no such thing as a law or even a Constitutional article or amendment that's etched in stone for all time.

    ANYTHING can be altered by Congress and 3/4 of the state's approval and the process doesn't involve the sitting President whatsoever.

    This is a lengthy read but it shows exactly what went on behind the scenes and how this so-called health-care reform had nothing to do with what it claimed and why it was purposely designed to fail.

    http://blog.oregonlive.com/my...
    (more)
  • Live Fr... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 23:34:06
    Live Free Or Die
    Ryan has a nerve to admonish the President with making cuts to Medicare when his plan would mean deeper cuts with eventual elimination, along with social security. Noticeably, the video cuts off what the President had to say in response to Ryan's accusations.

    I do know that the SCOTUS has ruled a health tax Constitutional. I understand Romney is in a terrible pinch at the moment. His only choice is complete Repeal, which is perhaps a GOP plan to single payer, but it's not the Democrat plan.

    I argue against Ryan speaking for all Americans. A great many support government run health care if it means more Americans receiving comprehensive coverage at a fair price.
  • Schläue~© Live Fr... 2012/07/07 00:01:38
    Schläue~©
    Ryan was focusing on the game of three card Monte that 0bozo was playing which was later confirmed by Kathleen Sibelius in front of Congressional committee when she admitted the figures were being double counted.

    There are no accusations to what Ryan said, the CBO has since agreed that their 2010 assessment was based upon what the WH put in front of them to score and with ALL the variables figured in, doesn't come close to reducing any deficits, instead raising the price tag well over $1.7 Trillion for only 6 years of full implementation. carry that out to the REAL 10 year period of 2024 and the numbers are staggering. Of course, it would have already collapsed long before then.

    Ryan's plan phases out Social Security over a 30-40 years period and is 100% optional for anyone over 25 at the time it would begin.

    Medicare is also and optional voucher system and NOBODY who is on the plan, or soon to be, would be denied any benefits. Once again, it's a phase out program that has been thoroughly lied about.

    No, there isn't any stealth GOP plan in the works for a single payer universal nightmare. 85% of Americans were happy with the plans they had..... just wanted some reforms to keep premiums from skyrocketing (which they have since Mar 2010) and get rid of the Medicaid & Medicare waste.

    ...

    Ryan was focusing on the game of three card Monte that 0bozo was playing which was later confirmed by Kathleen Sibelius in front of Congressional committee when she admitted the figures were being double counted.

    There are no accusations to what Ryan said, the CBO has since agreed that their 2010 assessment was based upon what the WH put in front of them to score and with ALL the variables figured in, doesn't come close to reducing any deficits, instead raising the price tag well over $1.7 Trillion for only 6 years of full implementation. carry that out to the REAL 10 year period of 2024 and the numbers are staggering. Of course, it would have already collapsed long before then.

    Ryan's plan phases out Social Security over a 30-40 years period and is 100% optional for anyone over 25 at the time it would begin.

    Medicare is also and optional voucher system and NOBODY who is on the plan, or soon to be, would be denied any benefits. Once again, it's a phase out program that has been thoroughly lied about.

    No, there isn't any stealth GOP plan in the works for a single payer universal nightmare. 85% of Americans were happy with the plans they had..... just wanted some reforms to keep premiums from skyrocketing (which they have since Mar 2010) and get rid of the Medicaid & Medicare waste.

    Fact is..... all of the FDR - Johnson programs are Ponzi schemes that would make Bernie Madoff smile. Any time a program is solely reliant on population growth out running the top tier recipients.... it's a pyramid scheme which is a felony in the USA.

    The programs are unsustainable and Ryan along with Millions of Americans don't want to turn their heads and allow it all to collapse on the next generation. Ignoring the problem is no longer an option.
    (more)
  • Live Fr... Schläue~© 2012/07/07 03:40:43
    Live Free Or Die
    The CBO and others give their analysis to the President first. Then he submits a budget based on what they are asking for. This is then tweaked to allow appropriations bills by other Committees. The Ryan plan, among others, also includes getting rid of Obamacare or at least that is what he says he's against. Romney won't win because he wants it both ways, like the other GOP'ers. He wants NOTHING for Americans, except private accounts and we don't need the government to do that for us, thanks anyway.

    Phasing out Medicare and cutting it, along with Medicaid and SS is NOT what the vast majority of Americans want or need. It's not a health plan either.

    By the way, you sound ignorant using the name Obozo.
  • JCD aka... Schläue~© 2012/07/06 17:09:50
    JCD aka "biz"
    +1
    One conservative friend here on SH mentioned a CBO study which seems to prove that tort reform would save around $50 billion over the next ten years, or 0.5% of the total cost of health care in the US.
    Nice pic.
  • Schläue~© JCD aka... 2012/07/06 18:04:15
    Schläue~©
    The CBO only scores what is placed in front of them and I would venture to guess the $50B figure was based upon the narrowest amount of reform.

    As I have posted elsewhere, include a criminal liability statute that carries a mandatory prison sentence for any attorney, plaintiff or 'expert witness' that is involved in filing or pursuing a fraudulent claim and the number of cases would drop, drastically.

    The pic is authentic.
  • Sissy Schläue~© 2012/07/06 12:53:33
    Sissy
    +3
    Hmm, then isn't it a shame that businesses didn't push for all that then, eh? Afterall they literally buy and own everything else our representatives do, mayhap they should have put a little effort into this "initiative". They sure don't mind buying and selling others. Go figure.

    I always find it amazing that when a con can't come up with civil, respectful posts they resort to personal insults. Now, go grow up.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 08:17:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals