Romney leads in nine of 11 key swing states by UnSkewed Polls averages
Mike56
2012/10/28 22:38:51
|
|
|||||
|
18 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
105 votes
|
|
85% | |||
| UnSkewed Polls averages for the 11 key swing states | ||||||||
| State | Date | Sample | MoE | Skew | ind. voters | Obama(D) | Romney(R) | Spread |
| Colorado | 10/15 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +3.5 D | +7.9 R | 47.2 | 48.4 | Romney +1.2 |
| Florida | 10/17 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +1.9 D | +0.3 R | 45.9 | 50.1 | Romney +4.2 |
| Iowa | 10/11 - 10/24 | -- | -- | +2.3 D | +0.8 O | 46.8 | 50.0 | Romney +3.2 |
| Michigan | 10/11 - 10/23 | -- | -- | +2.7 D | +1.3 R | 48.7 | 47.7 | Obama +1 |
| Nevada | 10/19 - 10/24 | -- | -- | +6.6 D | +0.6 R | 46.4 | 52.0 | Romney +5.6 |
| New Hampshire | 10/19 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +3 D | +1.0 R | 47.0 | 49.0 | Romney +2 |
| North Carolina | 10/20 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +3 D | +6.5 R | 46.5 | 50.5 | Romney +4 |
| Ohio | 10/17 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +4.6 D | +6.9 R | 45.7 | 48.5 | Romney +2.8 |
| Pennsylvania | 10/17 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +1.8 D | +6 O | 48.3 | 46.3 | Obama +2 |
| Virginia | 10/22 - 10/26 | -- | -- | +6.8 D | +25 R | 44.8 | 50.8 | Romney +6.0 |
| Wisconsin | 10/11 - 10/25 | -- | -- | +5.5 D | +1.8 O | 46.5 | 49.5 | Romney +3 |
| Sample: number of voters surveyed LV = likely voters RV = registered voters MoE = margin of error in survey Skew = percent of Democrats over-sampled or percent of independents under sampled Ind. Voters = margin of lead among independent voters in survey spread = percent candidate leads after poll is unskewed | ||||||||
Read More: http://unskewedpolls.com/all_11_swing_states_unske...
Top Opinion
-
Stryder 2012/10/28 23:34:26
A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being "likable" or that he doesn't "relate well" to people. Frankly, we struggled to understand why.
So after much research, we have come up with a Top Ten List to explain this "unlikablility."
Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney:
1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura.
Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.
2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her,
including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.
3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)
4. Can't speak in a fake, southern, "black preacher voice" when necessary.
5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and
Harvard Business School...and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.
6. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter
-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today's America ?
7. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church,didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!
8. Has a family of five great...
A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being "likable" or that he doesn't "relate well" to people. Frankly, we struggled to understand why.
So after much research, we have come up with a Top Ten List to explain this "unlikablility."
Top Ten Reasons To Dislike Mitt Romney:
1. Drop-dead, collar-ad handsome with gracious, statesmanlike aura.
Looks like every central casting's #1 choice for Commander-in-Chief.
2. Been married to ONE woman his entire life, and has been faithful to her,
including through her bouts with breast cancer and MS.
3. No scandals or skeletons in his closet. (How boring is that?)
4. Can't speak in a fake, southern, "black preacher voice" when necessary.
5. Highly intelligent. Graduated cum laude from both Harvard Law School and
Harvard Business School...and by the way, his academic records are NOT sealed.
6. Doesn't smoke or drink alcohol, and has never done drugs, not even in the counter
-culture age when he went to college. Too square for today's America ?
7. Represents an America of "yesterday", where people believed in God, went to Church,didn't screw around, worked hard, and became a SUCCESS!
8. Has a family of five great sons....and none of them have police records or are in drug rehab.
But of course, they were raised by a stay-at-home mom, and that "choice" deserves America 's scorn.
9. Oh yes.....he's a MORMON. We need to be very afraid of that very strange religion that
teaches its members to be clean-living, patriotic, fiscally conservative, charitable, self-reliant, and honest.
10. And one more point.....pundits say because of his wealth, he can't relate to ordinary Americans. I guess that's because he made that money HIMSELF.....as opposed to marrying it or inheriting it from Dad.
Apparently, he didn't understand that actually working at a job and earning your own moneymade you unrelatable to Americans. My goodness, it's a strange world, isn't it?
*****************************...
Personal Information:
His full Name is: Willard Mitt Romney
He was Born: March 12, 1947 and is 65 years old.
His Father: George W. Romney, former Governor of the State of Michigan
He was raised in Bloomfield Hills , Michigan
He is Married to Ann Romney since 1969; they have five children.
Education:
B. A. from Brigham Young University , J. D. and M.B.A. from Harvard University
Religion:
Mormon - The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints
Working Background:
After high school, he spent 30 months in France as a Mormon missionary.
After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously,
he passed the Michigan bar exam, but never worked as an attorney.
In 1984, he co-founded Bain Capital a private equity investment firm,
one of the largest such firms in the United States .
In 1994, he ran for Senator of Massachusetts and lost to Ted Kennedy.
He was President and CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.
In 2002, he was elected Governor of the State of Massachusetts where he eliminated a 1.5 billion deficit.
Some Interesting Facts about Romney:
Bain Capital, starting with one small office supply store in Massachusetts,
turned it into Staples; now over 2,000 stores employing 90,000 people.
Bain Capital also worked to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again,
with companies like Domino's, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King,
Warner Music Group, Dollarama, Home Depot Supply and many others.
He was an unpaid volunteer campaign worker for his dad's gubernatorial campaign 1 year.
He was an unpaid intern in his dad's governor's office for eight years.
He was an unpaid bishop and state president of his church for ten years.
He was an unpaid President of the Salt Lake Olympic Committee for three years.
He took no salary and was the unpaid Governor of Massachusetts for four years.
He gave his entire inheritance from his father to charity.
Mitt Romney is one of the wealthiest self-made men in our country but has given more
back to its citizens in terms of money, service and time than most men.
And in 2011 Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income....
Just for comparison purposes, Obama gave 1% and Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%.
Mitt Romney is Trustworthy:
He will show us his high school and college transcripts.
He will show us his social security card.
He will show us his law degree.
He will show us his draft notice.
He will show us his medical records.
Mitt Romney's background, experience and trustworthiness show him to be
a great leader and an excellent citizen for President of the United States .
You may think that Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans
could have selected. At least I know what religion he is, and that he won't desecrate the flag,
bow down to foreign powers, or practice fiscal irresponsibility.
I know he has the ability to turn around this financial debacle that the current regime has gotten
us into. We won't like all the things necessary to recover from this debt,but someone with Romney's background can do it.
But, on the minus side, he never was a "Community Organizer",never took drugs or smoked pot, never got drunk,
did not associate with communists or terrorists,nor did he attend a church whose pastor called for God to damn the US .
If you care about the United States of America-- Send this to all your friends!
I am used to these leftist techniques - lack of real achivements you are compnesating with skillful "reporting". A lot of "oversaw, signed, created, established, assigned", etc. Wasting taxpeyers' money on hiring countless nubmer of bureaucrats is robbing the nations, but you, the left, are always mentioning that as it was a kind of heroic acts. These laughable points (reminiscent of Brezhnev's speeches) - and of course your listings are endless, so busy people just give up. I've spent some time on your propagandist posting, even though it is alwmost 2 am at the place I am now (that is why it is going to be a lot of typos) and I have to prepare to flight back to the US in order to cast my voice against your disastorus "president".
In several occasions, you are refering to the articles that are ctiticising Obama, not praising as you claim (for examle, reagarding his alleged "beefing up" the border security). Crediting Obama for his promoting homosexual agendas is nothing but praising the deliberate polarisation of the society. Same about his PR-prompted "woman policies" - in the USSR, they had assigned more than 50% women to the "parliament" - but their real fate was terible both economically and it terms of social status...
I am used to these leftist techniques - lack of real achivements you are compnesating with skillful "reporting". A lot of "oversaw, signed, created, established, assigned", etc. Wasting taxpeyers' money on hiring countless nubmer of bureaucrats is robbing the nations, but you, the left, are always mentioning that as it was a kind of heroic acts. These laughable points (reminiscent of Brezhnev's speeches) - and of course your listings are endless, so busy people just give up. I've spent some time on your propagandist posting, even though it is alwmost 2 am at the place I am now (that is why it is going to be a lot of typos) and I have to prepare to flight back to the US in order to cast my voice against your disastorus "president".
In several occasions, you are refering to the articles that are ctiticising Obama, not praising as you claim (for examle, reagarding his alleged "beefing up" the border security). Crediting Obama for his promoting homosexual agendas is nothing but praising the deliberate polarisation of the society. Same about his PR-prompted "woman policies" - in the USSR, they had assigned more than 50% women to the "parliament" - but their real fate was terible both economically and it terms of social status. Redistribution, the primitive Obama's attitude is all about, is going to strangle this country, if he wins.
Hopefully, there will be less than expected voting dead corpses and he loses, for all the Americans' sake.
Is that all you read?
I am used to these leftist techniques - lack of real achivements you are compnesating with skillful "reporting". A lot of "oversaw, signed, created, established, assigned", etc. Wasting taxpeyers' money on hiring countless nubmer of bureaucrats is robbing the nations, but you, the left, are always mentioning that as it was a kind of heroic acts. These laughable points (reminiscent of Brezhnev's speeches) - and of course your listings are endless, so busy people just give up. I've spent some time on your propagandist posting, even though it is alwmost 2 am at the place I am now (that is why it is going to be a lot of typos) and I have to prepare to flight back to the US in order to cast my voice against your disastorus "president".
In several occasions, you are refering to the articles that are ctiticising Obama, not praising as you claim (for examle, reagarding his alleged "beefing up" the border security). Crediting Obama for his promoting homosexual agendas is nothing but praising the deliberate polarisation of the society. Same about his PR-prompted "woman policies" - in the USSR, they had assigned more than 50% women to the "parliament" - but their real fate was terible both economically and it terms of social status...
I am used to these leftist techniques - lack of real achivements you are compnesating with skillful "reporting". A lot of "oversaw, signed, created, established, assigned", etc. Wasting taxpeyers' money on hiring countless nubmer of bureaucrats is robbing the nations, but you, the left, are always mentioning that as it was a kind of heroic acts. These laughable points (reminiscent of Brezhnev's speeches) - and of course your listings are endless, so busy people just give up. I've spent some time on your propagandist posting, even though it is alwmost 2 am at the place I am now (that is why it is going to be a lot of typos) and I have to prepare to flight back to the US in order to cast my voice against your disastorus "president".
In several occasions, you are refering to the articles that are ctiticising Obama, not praising as you claim (for examle, reagarding his alleged "beefing up" the border security). Crediting Obama for his promoting homosexual agendas is nothing but praising the deliberate polarisation of the society. Same about his PR-prompted "woman policies" - in the USSR, they had assigned more than 50% women to the "parliament" - but their real fate was terible both economically and it terms of social status. Redistribution, the primitive Obama's attitude is all about, is going to strangle this country, if he wins.
Hopefully, there will be less than expected voting dead corpses and he loses, for all the Americans' sake.
Created by a conservative blogger who wasn't happy with the poll results so he rigged them to favor the republicans. What a joke, I wouldn't trust this loser to serve me my burger and fries let alone apply a new sampling standard to polling techniques.
That Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist?
That Wright is a racist?
That Chicago gangsters have been for Obama?
If you are in your state of denial - it is you who is ...
People who are backing Obama definitely lack common sense (and even maybe sanity) to judge anybody's mental capabilities