Romney breaks pledge, stands to profit from Bain's investment in Chinese surveillance company.
I think the truth team will find many deceptions by the moderate, Mittster, playing a conservative on TV. However, Mitt Romney is still making millions from his private equity firm Bain Capital’s financial investments around the world. But, in deciding to run for office, he’s been trying to shed those investments that conflict with his newly-found political principles. For example, when Romney decided to switch his rhetoric and start talking tough towards China, it was reported that his financial advisers “shed all his investments in China, worth as much as $1.5 million.”
In fact, Mitt Romney once declared:
“My trustee has indicated publicly that he will make an effort to make sure that my investments to the extent possible and practical will conform with my politcal positions."
Once again, the facts conflict with Romney’s political rhetoric. The New York Times revealed that Romney’s firm Bain Capital is still investing his money in China—this time, in a Chinese company that manufacturers surveillance systems:In December, a Bain-run fund in which a Romney family blind trust has holdings purchased the video surveillance division of a Chinese company that claims to be the largest supplier to the government’s Safe Cities program, a highly advanced monitoring system that allows the authorities to watch over university campuses, hospitals, mosques, and movie theaters from centralized command posts.
The Bain-owned company, Uniview Technologies, produces what it calls “infrared antiriot” cameras and software that enable police officials in different jurisdictions to share images in real time through the Internet. Previous projects have included an emergency command center in Tibet.
Financial disclosure forms show that Romney still has a stake of “between $100,000 and $250,000 in the Bain Capital Asia fund that purchased Uniview.” Tax Notes noted that Romney’s retirement agreement with Bain Capital “covers new buyout funds started by his former partners through February 2009,” which means “Romney receives income from profits interests in separate Bain funds that are still running.”
Not only is Mitt Romney’s investment directly conflicting with his pledge, it’s conflicting with his newly-found principles. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Romney attacked President Obama with the false claim that he’s “demurred” on China’s human rights record, allowing a government that “marries aspects of the free market with suppression of political and personal freedom” to become “a widespread and disquieting norm.”
According to human rights activists, the company that Romney stands to profit from makes the very tools that the Chinese government uses “to intimidate and monitor political and religious dissidents.” One Tibetan Buddhist Monk noted that such surveillance cameras “helped the authorities identify and detain nearly 200 monks who participated in a protest” in 2008. “There are video cameras all over our monastery, and their only purpose is to make us feel fear,” he added.
Standing to profit from such a company violates Romney’s past pledge to match his principles with his investments. But this is not the first time he’s broken that pledge. After promising to shed investments the conflict with his party’s positions on Iran, stem cell research, and other issues, Romney’s family still “kept some of those stocks” that conflicted “and repeatedly bought new investments in similar holdings as recently as 2010.”
Kind of reminds you of Dick Cheney who continued to profit from Haliburton after resigning to run for VP. No doubt he still is. Keeping the GOP honest is going to be a gargantuan task. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Read More: http://www.keepinggophonest.com/romney-breaks-pled...
Top Opinion
-
AnnForTruth 2012/03/17 22:33:29+7Good read and I heard this story about Romney some time this year. As a matter of fact, according to Romney, for the past ten years his investments have been in a blind trust, managed by a trustee. However, not all of his mutual funds were part of a blind trust. Romney is not only a phony, but a liar too.
Re:http://www.democraticunder...






















a vote for mittens is a vote to move more jobs OUT of America.
his supporters KNOW that and they don't care.
So tell me, who is the average schmuck that makes about 50K, has a 2 year college degree in economics and drives a 2009 Prius that is running for President?
Since you have a problem with people with money that also disqualifies Obie as well.
Want to make taxes FAIR? Then either have Flat Tax or a Consumption Tax where EVERY ONE pays into the system. There should be no free rides in this country.
If millionaires and billionaires don't want to pay the lowest top rate in history now, and most are paying 10-15% less than that an estate tax could be levied, but at a lower rate than current.
So lets bring that top rate back up to 35 or 40% for those making over a million. The Federal Estate Tax this year is 35% after the first 5 million and goes to 55% after the first million next year. Does that calm your heart or do you think more should be taken.
That will still do nothing to change the situation of the 21K earner.
OBTW, When tested I was found to have a very low Empathy score so don't try to play Whoa Is Me game. It doesn't work.
Just admit it, those on the left think that those who have money do not pay a fair share of the tax burden when they actually carry a disproportionate amount as opposed to the rest of the population. Everyone should pay a minimum income tax into the system. It is the right of living in this country.
No politician should sign any pledge to a lobbyist under the duress of threatening their job. It is pure cronyism and unfair politics.
What taxes are the poor, poor, pitiful poor paying that somebody else isn't? Give us a break with that outdated whine.
We don't blood from a stone. We want exactly what the lefties are always whining about. Fairness!
Everyone rides? Everyone pays thier Fair Share.
The pledge is stupid and box these idiots put themselves in and have no one to blame but themselves.
his trustee is running his assets.
'to make his investments match his political stands as much as possible.'
'keeping the GOP honest is going to be a gargantuan task?'
let's ask the president how his ideal of not hiring lobbyists for his WH staff is coming...
and its no foul. its an appropriate application of reality. weren't you the one that told me K street was what was wrong with Washington?
its annoying because its correct. by your own assessment, Romney isn't part of that cabal..
what the heck, Guins?
i thought that we agreed that K St was the problem?
at least on THAT score, he's clean. we wouldn't know what if that wouod remain the case until he'd get elected...
i'll assume that until i see otherwise...