
Robert Draper's Book: GOP's Anti-Obama Campaign Began The Night Of The Inauguration.
As President Barack Obama was celebrating his inauguration at various balls, top Republican lawmakers and strategists were conjuring up ways to submarine his presidency at a private dinner in Washington.
The event -- which provides a telling revelation for how quickly the post-election climate soured -- serves as the prologue of Robert Draper's much-discussed and heavily-reported new book, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives."
According to Draper, the guest list that night (which was just over 15 people in total) included Republican Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.), along with Republican Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.). The non-lawmakers present included Newt Gingrich, several years removed from his presidential campaign, and Frank Luntz, the long-time Republican wordsmith. Notably absent were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) -- who, Draper writes, had an acrimonious relationship with Luntz.
For several hours in the Caucus Room (a high-end D.C. establishment), the book says they plotted out ways to not just win back political power, but to also put the brakes on Obama's legislative platform.
"If you act like you're the minority, you're going to stay in the minority," Draper quotes McCarthy as saying. "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill and challenge them on every single campaign."
The conversation got only more specific from there, Draper reports. Kyl suggested going after incoming Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for failing to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes while at the International Monetary Fund. Gingrich noted that House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) had a similar tax problem. McCarthy chimed in to declare "there's a web" before arguing that Republicans could put pressure on any Democrat who accepted campaign money from Rangel to give it back.
The dinner lasted nearly four hours. They parted company almost giddily. The Republicans had agreed on a way forward:
Go after Geithner. (And indeed Kyl did, the next day: ‘Would you answer my question rather than dancing around it—please?’)
Show united and unyielding opposition to the president’s economic policies. (Eight days later, Minority Whip Cantor would hold the House Republicans to a unanimous No against Obama’s economic stimulus plan.)
Begin attacking vulnerable Democrats on the airwaves. (The first National Republican Congressional Committee attack ads would run in less than two months.)Win the spear point of the House in 2010. Jab Obama relentlessly in 2011. Win the White House and the Senate in 2012.
"You will remember this day," Draper reports Newt Gingrich as saying on the way out. "You’ll remember this as the day the seeds of 2012 were sown."
Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/25/robert-dr...
Top Opinion
-
+46The "hate" machine against this President has been the worst I have ever seen. And yet he still stands tall and will win in 2012. From the likes of drug addled Rush and Nugent they just can not stop him. These GOP candidates will loose too.






















1 Iran-Contra Affair
2 Department of Housing and Urban Development grant rigging
3 Lobbying scandal
4 EPA scandals
5 Inslaw Affair
6 Savings & loan crisis
7 Debategate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Seems like you want to have it both ways, you want your cake and eat it too. Pick one tack or the other. Most of the crap you put on your list wasn't actually divisive in the legislature on partisan lines anyway. You're just listing claimed Reagan scandals to tear him down now that I've pointed out how Obama doesn't measure up to Reagan.
Funny thing: I'm not even registered GOP. I'm a Libertarian.
But anyways, the construction "tea neocon" isn't idiotic because I'm an "infallible voice." Sorry, but it's idiotic because it doesn't make sense. It's actually oxymoronic and self-contradictory.
All that Koch conspiracy theory talking point nonsense may help you to try to understand the outrage of normal, average citizens who are sick of government excess; but it doesn't resemble reality at all. I attended my first TEA Party rally on April 15 2009 of my own volition and with no corporate or Koch Brothers backing. In fact, I didn't even know who the Koch brothers were. It was a spontaneous, authentic, grassroots political protest. I've never been very political and never protested or rallied or anything in my whole life until then.
So you can try to ignore or discredit people like me all you want, if that's what it takes to rationalize your own goofy and misguided political beliefs. But people like me -- and there are millions of us -- we know better. We know what the TEA Party really is. We know who we are.
But what's your point?
Well?? aren't the RIGHT-WINGERS just as bad?
Sure it is.
"It's about the most extreme, self-servingly machiavellian opposition tactics our generation has had the misfortune of experiencing."
You just described the Democratic Party to a T. I've never seen anything like the extremist, self-serving, Machiavellian opposition tactics and cheap populist demagoguery of the Democratic Party of the past 3 years under Pelosi, Reid & Obama.
Take the budget issue, for a start. Even though submitting a budget is the most basic of all of the responsibilities of any Congress, and even though it is required by federal law, the Democrat controlled Senate has refused since 2008 to submit a single budget proposal for any of those years. Not one. Why this continued dereliction of duty? Because it hasn't been politically expedient for the Democrats to submit a budget proposal for a vote.
The Democrats calculated that it would be far more politically advantageous to repeatedly force the Republicans into a game of high-stakes brinksmanship of negotiating continuing resolutions to fund the federal government in order to demagogue specific discretionary spending items. The idea was to replicate over and over the success that the Democrats enjoyed in the famous 1995 government shutdown duel in which Democrats believed they damaged the Republicans. It was a cynical Machiavellian ploy then, and it's a cynical Machiave...
Take the budget issue, for a start. Even though submitting a budget is the most basic of all of the responsibilities of any Congress, and even though it is required by federal law, the Democrat controlled Senate has refused since 2008 to submit a single budget proposal for any of those years. Not one. Why this continued dereliction of duty? Because it hasn't been politically expedient for the Democrats to submit a budget proposal for a vote.
The Democrats calculated that it would be far more politically advantageous to repeatedly force the Republicans into a game of high-stakes brinksmanship of negotiating continuing resolutions to fund the federal government in order to demagogue specific discretionary spending items. The idea was to replicate over and over the success that the Democrats enjoyed in the famous 1995 government shutdown duel in which Democrats believed they damaged the Republicans. It was a cynical Machiavellian ploy then, and it's a cynical Machiavellian ploy now.
It's all part of a shameless fear-mongering strategy that seems to characterize virtually everything that Congressional Democrats have done during the Obama years.
So no, it's not a childish "I'm rubber and you're glue" debate tactic. It's reality. What explanation do you have for this unprecedented situation? Is this the way Congress normally has operated in the past?
You're a total lame-brain.
This just shows how deeply ingrained your partisan mentality is. The debate surrounding the Zadroga Act's passage had to do with appropriate funding mechanisms, not whether or not the basic legislative aims of the bill was appropriate. So no, it's not an undeniably clear-cut example of how the GOP has schemed to undermine the Dems or the President's agenda. It's just the opposite. It's an example of how the Dems are always poised and willing to use any issue to depict the Republicans as mean-spirited and evil.
"Spin, redirect, lie, repeat is the current GOP mantra, so why wouldn't their followers adopt the same strategy?"
The funny thing is that I'm not even a Republican; but even I can see through the lies and demagoguery of the shameless hyper-partisan Democrats.
I'd laugh at your reply if there was anything at all funny about how inane it is. When Republicans voted down Zadroga as part of a scorched-earth strategy to force the extension of the Bush tax cuts ( http://www.newsday.com/news/n... ), and dismissed it as "a massive new entitlement program" ( http://www.politico.com/blogs... ), they were just expressing concern about the "funding mechanisms" of the act? And what of the "funding mechanisms"? Preserving a tax loophole for foreign companies is a greater priority than providing health care for ailing and dying first responders? Give me a break.
And you say "you lose" ... what did I lose? Were you pretending that this was a real debate or something? How could it have been a real debate when your position is so rigid and utterly inflexible at the outset. No, this never was a debate to begin with. Your mind is so totally addled by partisan propaganda that you're incapable of debate. That makes you the real loser here.