Right-Winger tries to register his dog to vote.

I can see the rite-wingers thinking he is a hero, he proved there is voter fraud.. they commit it but they will leave that tidbit out of the narrative.

you know technically an 18 year old dog would be 126 in human years, no dog is old enough to vote.

How is this any less legal than the dead being registered, illegal immigrants and unregistered voters being allowed to vote?

so 2 wrongs make a right?

Let's see... a "Right-Winger" who is married to a political activist tries to register his dog "to prove a point" according to the video, and the prosecutor is considering trying the case as a class four felony which could possibly send this guy to jail for 18 months.

But when Sheriff Joe Apraio's Cold Case squad discovers that the ONLY Document that provides any indication that Obama was born in the U.S. is found to be a fraudulent fabrication, everyone derides the Sheriff instead of castigating the forger...

Who'da thunk that would happen?

[...]

Looking at your 'handle', I guess you are married to Uncle Tea Party?

I believe that retard should go to jail with his dog in a kennel for at least two months.

Birthers are morons.

Two months? Why just two months? How about Life! Yeah... why not life in prison! Chicago Dems register DEAD people all the time but if somebody tries to 'prove a point' by registering a dog... but his butt in JAIL!

And while you are at it... let's put the entire "Cold Case Posse" in prison too... because they are BIRTHER Morons.

After watching the six 2min. videos on the process that these three former police detectives, the two retired attorneys and their vetted presentation approved by the legal staff in the Maricopa County Prosecutors office, I'm sure you will agree that they are GUILTY of BEING MORONS, just as CQ says!

Due to their rash and unfounded conclusion that there is sufficient probable cause to warrant a full blown criminal investigation they are obviously morons... just ask the Captain! (after watching this...
http://www.westernjournalism.... )

Yea that's it. Their detailed presentation leaves the viewer with either the conclusive evidence that the internet version of Barry's LFBC is a fraud... or that the entire Maricopa PD is staffed with morons. Watch the videos and see for yourself.

Yes, two months, so that he learns his lesson.

Yes, Birthers are still morons.

And what lesson is that? That you can registar dead people but not register your dog?

BTW - did you watch the police department's presentation of the forensic evidence against the alleged internet birth certificate?

If so, which part was 'moronic'?

If not, passing biased judgements without details and facts... who is the real moron?

The moron should go to jail for breaking the law, just like most protesters that do all the time.

I tried to watch the "evidence" in question, but it's all BS, once they said "We created our own document" and then compare everything to "their document' which isn't really the way things work.They couldn't find a document online comparable and compare both works, now could they? Nope... why not? Oops.

Cap't: "Its all BS..."

Sir, they created their own document to use as a base line, then compared their base line document with Barry's internet BC. What's the problem with that?

How better would you explain to laypeople how an allegedly scanned document has movable component parts such as the authenticating date and seal stamps?

Once the evidence was vetted by the legal folks, how better would you suggest they present their findings to the laypeople in the audience and press?

The problem is that we don't know what they have done to their baseline document that wasn't done to the original. They'd have to find other such documents given from the same source and run a check on those as well.

But, Birthers will believe anything.

"They'd have to find other such documents given from the same source and run a check on those as well."

Interesting... can you provide citation for your statement?

The way to test such a document is to test against a similar doc... not against your own doc.

You don't test oranges against apples. They obviously didn't do any research with the offices that put out the document, either... so they aren't really trying, here... their evidence is garbage.

I could test my theories against my document that I've made up and find totally different things and that would all of a sudden make their document a forgery. Wouldn't it? Nope.

it's absured. Birthers are nuts.

they did state that they know of the computer that fabricated the document, is that possible?

They'd have to prove that... and they didn't. Their case is speculation, which they say it isn't.

i thought all repugs were trying this. they have to have some turnout at the polls this year. how else could they do it?

not the first time i've heard a story like this. dog got jury duty to and thats when he had to confess.

But the dog is a democrat.

Anyone who thinks a liar is a hero for any reason is a douche bag

I agree, that's why Obama needs to be prosicuted to the full extent of the law!

dude, is this where you got your brain