Quantcast

Rick Scott Strikes Out Again: Federal Court Blocks Florida Attack On Early Voting

ProudProgressive 2012/08/17 19:03:14

After failing to get much of a "bump" from the choice of extremist Paul Ryan as Mitt Romney's running mate, and with the questions regarding Romney's secret tax returns refusing to go away, the Right Wing seems to realize that their only remaining hope come November is to disenfranchise as many American citizens as they can. They gained a temporary victory in Pennsylvania where a conservative judge decided to ignore all the evidence presented in the case and protect Pennsylvania's Voter Suppression Law, though it seems almost inevitable that the decision will be overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. But in Florida there are still some judges that respect the law more than partisan considerations. Score another one for the American Voter.

Article excerpt follows:

Rick Scott Strikes Out Again: Federal Court Blocks Florida Attack On Early Voting
By Tara Culp-Ressler
Aug 17, 2012

Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) has been relentless in his push to restrict the right to vote. He’s advanced an illegal voter purge that would have disproportionately impacted the minority citizens in his state. And a federal court blocked his effort to suppress voter registration last May. On Thursday, a federal court in Washington, DC concluded that another part of Scott’s anti-voting agenda cannot take effect because the state’s new restrictions on early voting negatively impact minority communities.

Last year, the Republican-controlled legislature cut Florida’s number of early voting days down from 12 to 8. However, because minority communities tend to utilize early voting days, the federal court ruled that fewer options for early voting “would make it materially more difficult for some minority voters to cast a ballot.” The court rejected the state’s early voting changes based on their discriminatory impact:

We conclude that we cannot preclear Florida’s early voting changes at this time because the State has failed to satisfy its burden of proving that those changes will not have a retrogressive effect on minority voters if the covered counties offer only the minimum number of early voting hours required under the new statute, which would constitute only half the hours required under the prior law.

The proposed cuts to early voting days came before the court under Section 5 of the national Voting Rights Act, which requires areas with a history of racial discrimination to preclear changes to their election laws by either a federal court or the Justice Department. Several of Florida’s counties are covered by Section 5, and the federal court concluded those counties must make additional early voting hours available to voters.

Other states are also in the process of making it more difficult for citizens to exercise their right to vote by restricting voting hours. After controversy over the fact that Ohio’s proposed restricted hours would only go into effect in Democratic-leaning counties, Ohio is now choosing to restrict voting hours to weekends in every single county.


Read More: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/08/17/704761...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Redneck Gal 2012/08/17 20:02:50
    Redneck Gal
    +5
    Now we know exactly why we have FEDERAL laws...to preclude states from doing what they feel like. There are so many seniors in Florida that want to hang onto their Medicare, Romney has shot himself in the foot by giving Ryan the nod for VP.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Piper 2012/08/18 00:40:12
    Piper
    +4
    Well he tried, bless his corrupt LITTLE heart. Rick Scott is not a 'popular' governor in Florida, and it disgusts many Floridians, that he managed to buy the office he holds.
  • Rogue_L... Piper 2012/08/18 01:04:58
  • Piper Rogue_L... 2012/08/18 03:17:25
    Piper
    +2
    I don't think anyone who gives a damn, has a problem with that. Neither 'party' is innocent of trying to control election results, I'm sure, however they can legally. Many of the measures Republicans are pushing now, in order for LEGAL citizens to cast ONE vote on election day, are not as simple as they sound.

    When I had to renew my driver's license in FL last year, it took two days of trying to get the particular birth certificate required. My original birth certificate with the little feet imprints didn't work, even though I was born in Florida, in a Navy hospital, even though I had the other proof of I.D. required. For some people who want to vote and have a right to, that would have been much harder than is was for me.

    Rick Scott's attempts to prevent legal citizens from voting, goes beyond that.
  • Rogue_L... Piper 2012/08/18 03:43:11
  • Piper Rogue_L... 2012/08/18 20:27:14
    Piper
    +1
    I don't think that's the greatest analogy, but okay. There are a variety of reasons why a person might not be able to cast their vote on election day, and early voting is utilized by many. I just don't agree, that making it harder for certain people to vote, can be simplified to "tough noogies".
  • Rogue_L... Piper 2012/08/18 21:45:24
  • Piper Rogue_L... 2012/08/18 22:11:28
    Piper
    +1
    Yes, that is why trying to change those rules because it MIGHT benefit a certain 'party' in the upcoming election, is a manipulation of the system.
  • Rogue_L... Piper 2012/08/18 23:19:51 (edited)
  • Piper Rogue_L... 2012/08/18 23:55:16
    Piper
    +1
    Wow, surely you didn't just say that?
  • Raymond Allamby 2012/08/17 21:32:37
    Raymond Allamby
    +1
    voldemort goes down again. how sweet it is.
  • JaguarSocialist 2012/08/17 20:54:48
    JaguarSocialist
    +1
    I'm happy to see the federal courts striking down these right wing enacted laws because the sole purpose is denying voting rights to minorities. Conservatives supported sending U.S. troops to Iraq and, in the process, ensure Iraqis could vote in free elections. At the same time, said right wing kooks are making every effort to disenfranchise millions of American voters especially minorities.
  • Redneck Gal 2012/08/17 20:02:50
    Redneck Gal
    +5
    Now we know exactly why we have FEDERAL laws...to preclude states from doing what they feel like. There are so many seniors in Florida that want to hang onto their Medicare, Romney has shot himself in the foot by giving Ryan the nod for VP.
  • stevmackey 2012/08/17 19:13:49
    stevmackey
    We need to stay in there. This is a state that uses voter ID. We need to keep it there. The President has no right to interfere with states rights.
  • JaguarS... stevmackey 2012/08/17 20:55:36
    JaguarSocialist
    +2
    The president didn't interfere. A federal court did and, by the way, the Voting Rights Act is still in force for Florida and dozens of other states.
  • unclepat 2012/08/17 19:12:53
    unclepat
    +4
    I wonder if the GOP seems more intent on having people just say "the hell with it" and stay home rather than actually preventing anyone from voting. I mean other than the occasional luck with some fellow conservative judge siding with them, these idiots just have to know that what they are doing is illegal!

News & Politics

2013/06/19 06:42:46

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals