Rick Perry tells Obama and HHS to go **** themselves
AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - Governor Rick Perry said on Monday Texas will not implement an expansion of the Medicaid program or create a health insurance exchange, placing the state with the highest percentage of people without insurance outside key parts of President Barack Obama's signature law.
Perry joined fellow Republican governors of Florida, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Mississippi and Louisiana in rejecting the two provisions of the law, according to americanhealthline.com. They hope that November elections will result in Republicans winning the White House and enough seats in Congress to repeal the law.
"I will not be party to socializing healthcare and bankrupting my state in direct contradiction to our Constitution and our founding principles of limited government," Perry said in a statement.
He sent a letter on Monday to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking her to relay the message to Obama that Perry opposes the provisions "because both represent brazen intrusions into the sovereignty of our state."
"I stand proudly with the growing chorus of governors who reject the Obamacare power grab. Neither a 'state' exchange nor the expansion of Medicaid under this program would result in better 'patient protection' or in more 'affordable care,'" said Perry, who dropped out of the Republican presidential race in January. "They would only make Texas a mere appendage of the federal government when it comes to health care."
Perry, the longest-serving governor in Texas history, is a frequent critic of the Obama administration and the author of a book on states' rights called "Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America From Washington." Perry in 2009 rejected federal funding for unemployment benefits because accepting it would have required Texas to expand the number of people entitled to draw the benefits.
"To expand this program is like adding a thousand people to the Titanic," Perry said. "You don't expand a program that is not working already. If the federal government were serious about finding solutions, what they would do is block-grant those dollars back to the states, so states could find more efficient ways to deliver healthcare."
------------------------------------
Farnsworths take: BAM!

Read More: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/texas-governor-rejects-tw...






















There is now (and always has been) economic competition between the states. It is not a coincidence that the states with less government, lower taxes, and "right to work" laws are doing better than the high-tax, union-friendly states. Employers aren't (usually) stupid.
Perry knows that it's an economic "race to the bottom"; a competition to determine which state can exempt itself from as much of Obamacare as possible. For those who really want state-subsidized components of Obamacare, Greyhound has bus service to California.
wait for it.....wait for it........
you would agree to be moved out of your state simply for daring to be poor??... why do you despise them???
On the other hand, why would taxpayers agree to let their state become a magnet for entitlements that primarily benefit non-taxpayers?
The crazy part is not what Texas is doing -- it's the states that offer to roll out the Medicaid welcome mat.
How is people who can afford the Newist Iphone and Suvs Poor?
your Racism of those who refuse to worship obama and liberal progressives is DISGUSTING
when the 2nd American Revoulition all the TRAITORS will be defeated
Taliban Polio Ban Puts 240,000 Children at Risk...
http://www.google.com/hostedn...
All the while your hero obama wants to make peace with these clowns