Quantcast

RFID Chip Implant found in the HC Bill, not kidding.

SEE FOR YOURSELF, IT'S IN THE HBC.
Posted March 29, 2010 from friends at RESISTNET
There is an old adage that seeing is believing, the only alternative is to convince yourself that your lying eyes are wrong. Would you upon seeing something for yourself by way of documented proof believe your own eyes and accept it as the truth, even if it was hard for you to accept?
There will always be those who will remain in denial even though they know better, they will not accept it because they can not bring themselves to admit it to themselves. For those described here this will be a wasted effort.
However, there will always be those who upon seeing with their own eyes will not only accept, but will realize the harsh reality at hand they are witnessing. For those described here this will be a wake up call.
The following are government documents as evidence of what has just been done to the American people under the guise of healthcare. You have a choice, be one of those who believe what they see, or, tell yourself that your lying eyes are wrong.
You are facing a difficult choice, a real and present choice, not a hypothetical or future choice. You are being forewarned and given an opportunity to choose where and how you will go. For medical services will you agree for yourself and your family to be chipped like a farm animal with a RFID? Better start making up your mind now.
Sec. 2521, P. 1000 – The govt. will establish a National Medical Device Registry. H.R. 3200 [Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008:
(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘(B) and is— ‘‘(I) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Page 104 defines data in paragraph 1
Section B National Medical Device Registry from H.R. 3200 [Healthcare Bill], pages 1001-1008:
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance...
Approved by the FDA, a class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Any other data deemed appropriate by the secretary, so is the sky is the limit?
Pages 1001-1008 “National Medical Device Registry” section.
Page 1006 “to be enacted within 36 months upon passage”
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationa...
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf
What your future holds in store. You go to a doctor for medical services; you are informed that he must implant an RFID chip in your body. And that all of your medical history must be programmed into the chip, and if you refuse the RFID chip under law he will not be able to treat you. Sound like science fiction? It’s not; it’s in the healthcare bill. Looking at the other information links provided tells us its been an idea for a very long time.

rfid chip law treat sound science fiction healthcare information links
+11
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Rich_Media 2013/01/06 04:23:47
    Rich_Media
    +9
    It's apparently in the Senate final ObamaCare Bill as well. Here is an interesting 'Tube.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This guy also addresses Snopes as well, as if they need addressing. We all know they both are flaming liberals.
    reply
  • Foxy 2012/12/01 15:49:07
    Foxy
    +9
    Not only are they talking about implanting this chip by April of 2013. I have seen reports of modernized guillotines being shipped to military bases across the country I need to do more research on the validity of these sightings, but when the pod caster asked the solider what he though they were for the solider didn't know. the pod caster said it would be used on Americans, Christians who refused the implants
    reply
  • TidBit 2012/09/19 11:10:34
    TidBit
    +3
    obamacare side effects
    reply
  • TidBit 2012/09/19 11:06:45
    TidBit
    +2
    obamacare
    reply
  • TidBit 2012/09/19 11:04:42
    TidBit
    +1
    obamanation
    reply
  • TidBit 2012/09/19 11:01:57
    TidBit
    +2
    so true
    reply
  • Punisher250 2012/08/30 13:55:28
    Punisher250
    In fact, check here: http://www.snopes.com/politic...
    reply
  • TidBit Punishe... 2012/09/19 10:57:09
    TidBit
    +3
    I read this in the healthare bill. I believe my own eyes before I believe snopes.com
    reply
  • Homewre... TidBit 2013/02/05 18:05:44
    Homewrecker_
    +1
    Then you read the wrong bill. The one I just read didn't mention any RFID chips at all. Try again.
    reply
  • Punisher250 2012/08/30 13:54:57
    Punisher250
    This is false: check Snopes.com
    reply
  • BeatTheChip 2012/08/24 18:44:36
    BeatTheChip
    I am really glad you pointed this out! A lot of people have hinted around this but they have not provided any definitions or real sources that would point to RF technologies. Thank you for posting this. We will take a second look and do more coverage on RFID uses in individually mandated healthcare items. At the very least, people should be able to Opt out. If you are more concerned and want to get active right away, please contact Patient Privacy Rights in Austin, TX. They will partner with you and others to help advocate for individual privacy rights in a time of Big Brother: Big Data.
    reply
  • Rick Daniels 2012/07/24 20:13:49
    Rick Daniels
    +5
    I don't care if this is the mark of the beast or not, I still aint taking it, Who knows what it can do to ya.God bless
    reply
  • Trapperpk 2012/06/29 23:03:55
    Trapperpk
    +2
    If someone cares to, please check and research the actual text in the House Bill and post it for our reading consumption. I am not an animal.
    reply
  • Punishe... Trapperpk 2012/08/30 13:56:16
    Punisher250
    Here ya go: http://www.snopes.com/politic...
    reply
  • TidBit Punishe... 2012/09/19 10:57:36
    TidBit
    +2
    snopes is full of crap
    reply
  • sue 2012/06/28 22:00:45
    sue
    +3
    why does everything have to be about religion? Can we ever have ONE conversation without bring God or the Bible into it? We would be far better off with out the damn doctor, holistic medicine is better, traditional western medicine masks problems, helps with one problem and causes another. Simply don't get the damn chip!
    reply
  • J Bean sue 2012/06/29 16:27:05
    J Bean
    +2
    Its called free speech. Why is it every time someone brings up religion in a conversation, theres always another to condemn them. We all have different opinions...get over it! Did you join this discussion expecting everyone to agree with your point of view and have the same belief system? I enjoy a hearing everyones opinions, and comparing them with what I believe. I may not agree, but I'll listen. And I agree that holistic medicine is a great alternative, just not exclusively.
    reply
  • thelibe... J Bean 2012/06/30 01:48:49
    theliberaldead
    +3
    I think maybe you need to read over your post, and come to realize the irony of what you just said. Your misunderstanding of our constitutional right to free speech is what's wrong with this country today. You assume that YOU have the right to free speech, but other people don't have the right to tell you what they think of the speech that you give.
    reply
  • 4th density 2012/06/28 17:48:08
    4th density
    +2
    if your god condemns you to an eternity of hellfire and damnation because you needed medical attention i don't want any part of that.. it doesn't matter its all fiction anyway. i am not denying the existence of a creator, but i do seriously question the validity of that book or any other book purported to be divinely inspired but written and altered by man. get a grip people.
    reply
  • amanda.... 4th den... 2012/06/28 18:51:17
    amanda.westfall2
    +1
    OK, I'm going to start off like this. STOP TRYING TO PROCLAIM THAT THIS IS "THE MARK OF THE BEAST." unless you have studied prophesy. If you have, then you already know that there are a lot of prophesies that MUST come first. Personally, I don't think that this is right, but still. If you read Revelations, you will see that the mark of the beast is not instated until after the halfway mark of the tribulation period. We haven't even started the first half of the tribulation period. People don't have to worry about the Mark of the Beast until the Anti-Christ has revealed himself. Plus, there is not a single world leader. the world hasn't been re-divided up into ten kingdoms, and about a thousand other things. CALM DOWN EVERYONE!!!!! lol
    reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next » Last »

About Me

JO4USA

JO4USA

Seattle, WA, US

2008/05/21 02:12:12

Pitch Fork pack'in Fiscally Independent Conservative

View complete profile

Recent Posts

View All

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals

The Latest From SodaHead

News

Politics