Republic of the U.S.A., or North American Union, which nation name do you want to embrace?

Under the governorship of the N.A.U., the Constitution would definitely be cast away, and our right to live would be decided by those that run the entire world. If this happens, then there is nothing protecting us from the communist take over in America. If we act now, we can stop the N.A.U., and restore our Republic to its legacy of being the free world. If we continue to argue over political parties, we are only contributing to the destruction, as we are being misled as to what the parties really represent. I know that I have done enough research on the terms DEMOCRACY and REPUBLIC, not the party affiliations, but it seems to me the party affiliations came after the establishment of our REPUBLIC, and the DEMOCRACY in which we live. Confusing as politics seems to be, it is clear that at this point in our country's regime, the politicians represent themselves, not the government established to protect its people from rogue corruption.

Just to reiterate why our forefathers wrote the Constitution in the first place, was when this country was founded, regardless of its already being inhabited by the Native Americans, the Constitution was written to establish fair and just laws that governed the territories within this country. It was written by a group of highly spiritual men, that fought and defended the very rights that are being stripped from us. They did not fight for these rights from the totalitarians of England, but for the freedoms that they were not granted in England. The forefathers that wrote the Constitution, and the people that fought the Revolution from England did not know what the free world was, but it was something like common sense to understand that a dictatorial leader that made choices that infringed on someone else's well being, was not a manner in which they wanted to carry on their lives. They wanted more, and they knew that if they did not demand it, and fight for it they would never get it. They worked and fought for the rights and laws they felt were fair and just for a nation of people to be governed by. These men only wrote laws that were fair and just, thus the reason the Constitution has withstood the test of time.

Our current President has said himself that the laws in the Constitution that govern us, have presented some obstacles when it comes to his erroneous agenda. In that, he has said the document is meant to evolve not be timeless. I feel that this "timeless" document has gotten us back on the right track multiple times, and it is an excellent reference to learn how the fathers of our nation thought, as well as to understand what freedom means, not just a word, but the actions one is permitted to engage in under a free government. Now our Constitution is being revoked from the people it was established to protect, whats worse is were all so busy fighting over which political affiliation is more appropriate for our society, but neither party represents the root of its idealism.

The concept behind REPUBLIC is a "government for the people by the people, in which the people of that nation have the sole authority to hold their government to account.

The concept of DEMOCRACY is to have elected officials chosen by a majority vote, that also can be held to account by the people that elected them, as a result of again the people of the nation having the vested power to authorize all social matters. Social matters covering a wide range of issues.

Communism is quite simply the governing of a nation by one person, that makes all social decisions and the people have no voice in the social on goings for that nation.

Is it fair to assume, that the American People have been lied to regarding their politicians, other than the fact that most politicians are paid to lie, or better give lip service, but the fact of the matter is the only real difference between our politicians is none. They merely use the mainstream media, and any other platform they can get into to convince the public they are very different from each other, when in reality neither affiliation has too much respect for the Constitution anymore. Perhaps its time for another American Revolution?

In the current time, I believe that the Constitution still overrides everything, as the fact of the matter is Obama admitted himself, that the President does not have the power to alter the Constitution, and therefore it is still a living document, that can be reenacted. It is the law of law in our nation, and before we completely surrender our Constitution, I believe it is time for Americans as a whole to wake up and understand the politicians then research the ideologies that represent the parties. Make a decision whether the current DEMOCRATIC candidate, or the current REPUBLICAN candidate represent the ideas the REPUBLICAN party was founded on, or does the DEMOCRATIC candidate represent the ideas the DEMOCRATIC party was founded and established on. If you need assistance, perhaps you should refer to you Bill Of Rights under the law of the Constitution. After reading your Bill Of Rights, I suggest you read the words that are our pledge of allegiance to the American Flag. Read the pledge and say the pledge to yourself, and as your saying this to yourself, ask yourself what does the REPUBLIC for which it stands mean in the pledge of allegiance. Once you have done this, it might finally seem very apparent that neither candidate of this time era have the right representation of our nation.

Take political affiliation, and forget about it! Now place the candidates side by side, along with their campaign contributors, their voting record, their approved legislation whether it had opposition or not, and ask yourself does this person represent what I believe in as a free person living in the Western Civilization? Answer what your freedom means to you, and how far your willing to go to defend it. Are you ready and willing to defend your freedom, and if so, are you still convinced that the different party terms really mean that the candidates represent the ideas behind the parties, and that the candidates are different from each other, or is it very clear that the candidates look more like twins.