REMEMBER WHEN OBAMA SAID HE WANTED TO EMULATE ABRAHAM LINCOLN?? DO YOU THINK OLD ABE WOULD BE PROUD??

Wow . . That sure was a lot of blah blah, but you never really said anything much with all of those words, did you?

. . . except that you can't support anything this Dilorenzo character had to say in his book.

Did you even read the book?

And no, I have NEVER read anything by DiLorenzo except the cover of the book in the graphic you provided. I never said I did.

But the books cover ridicules Lincoln for starting an "Unnecessary War," and that IS Bull Sh*t.

"I have NEVER read anything by DiLorenzo except the cover of the book in the graphic you provided. I never said I did.



"But the books cover ridicules Lincoln for starting an 'Unnecessary War,' and that IS Bull Sh*t."



1. Again, for the slow among us (looking at you, Lee), _I_ did not post that graphic. Get back on the short bus and go back to school.



2. Again you confess your own ignorance and make an assertion that proves you to be an idiot. Not having read the work, any assertion that a statement made on the cover is "Bull Sh*t" is both intellectually dishonest and stupid.



And no, until you do your own homework and can actually even attempt to support YOUR assertions, I have no responsibility to do your homework for you. (Oh, right. That's probably how you got through whatever schooling you have: someone else must have done your homework FOR you.)

i see you can count . . . all the way up to two. Good for you. lol


Yes I can support my assertions.

I assert that Lincoln did not start, promote, or perpetuate an "Unnecessary War."

That war was thrust upon him and upon the nation by Ultra-Conservative, States-rights advocates and traitors who sought to rip this nation apart.

If you disagree, then please present some evidence to support the claim that the civil war was an unneccessary war promoted by Lincoln.

Yet another worthless, useless attempt at deflection. You have not yet begun to even attempt to support your initial assertions, and since you have not yet done your homework (read DiLorenzo's work--any of it), you cannot begin to do so. Therefore, everything you have said since is pure, worthless verbiage. Support (or at least attempt to), from factual rebuttals of actual statements made by DiLorenzo or STFU as being nothing but the lazy, worthless piece of "Bull Sh*t" you have demonstrated yourself to be thus far.



"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries... Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second time-a."

Just as i thought . . . You are completely incapable of defending any claim you make.

And you certainly can't defend any of Delorenzodingdong's assertions.

You strike me as being mentally ill in a very creepy way.

ugh

Thank you for so aptly demonstrating the mindset of so many self-described Conservatives.

Was this book written by some slandering, piece of garbage, Right Wing Nut Job.

From the cover, it certainly looks like it.

From your comment, you are obviously speaking from complete, total and absolute ignorance. Critiquing a book without reading it is simply dishonest. Casting aspersions on the character of the author without reading his work is positive evidence that you are yourself a "slandering, piece of garbage". Projection much?

Well, I am criticizing the book on the premise that one can indeed tell a book from its cover.

And the cover of the book claims that Lincoln promoted an "unnecessary war."

What's your problem. Can't you defend the book?

You didn't really read it did you?

Must not have if you can't defend it.

*yawn* Not doing your homework for you. Grow up and do your own.

Just as i thought . . . You got NUTHIN.

Again: toolazy to do your homework, so all you have is a childish attempt at deflection. "What a maroon! What an ignoranimous," as that great American philosopher, BB, so famously noted.



If you were halfway intelligent in your attempts to deflect, change subjects, ignore your own blatant gaffes, insipidies and idiocies, you might even manage to be amusing. As it is, you're just boringly pathetic.

Are you looking in the mirror and talking to yourself again??

Well, at least you have one friend.

haha

Abe wasn't a marxist,Case closed!

And what's your point? Your comment is in no way, shape, fashion or form responsive to my comment. (Oh, and learn to use orthographic typography. It's "Marxist".)

So you don't like Abe Lincoln huh?

That attitude is becoming more and more fashionable among Right Wing Nut Jobs these days isn't it?

. . . Especially in the south.

I'm so glad Ol' Abe and his Blue clad Union boys just totally beat the snot out of those traitorous Confederate scum . . . aren't you?

I especially like the way Sheraton dealt with the Shenadoah Valley and the way Sherman's boys took care of South Carolina.

Now that was some good work . . . I don't care what anybody says.

Obviously, you enjoy exposing your ignorance and inability to speak on topic.

So far, you have been back pedaling and side stepping in your haste to avoid the topic.

I asked you to defend Diwhat'shisname's contention that Lincoln promoted an unnecessary war.

I see you can't do that. Fine. Please don't blame me for your inability to defend this book you think is so wonderful.

Why don't you just take your time, collect your thoughts, and come up with a couple of paragraphs that in any way proves that Lincoln was responsible for the Civil War.

Come on . . . .I know you can do it.

First: you only asked for an argument supporting the statement on the front of DiLorenzo's book in this most recent round. Until you can offer ANY support for your earlier multiple assertions, I have no need to rebut piled on, NEW assertions. And I have no need, at least were I arguing with anyone who's rational and honest, to rebut a general assertion that DiLorenzo's theses are "Bull Sh*t" made by someone who has confessed his total, complete and absolute ignorance of DiLorenzo's work.



You really are an idiot if you think I have any responsibility to repair your lifetime of ignorance and intellectual dishonesty. And if you think your childish attempts at taunting me will work, then obviously you've been associating with other dim-witted, poorly-educated dullards like yourself.

Still nothing huh?

I expected that.

AS far as I know Abe Lincoln Was NEVER a share the wealth class war fare Marxist, Can I make it any cleaerer for you to understand then that really?

And your comment is still unresponsive to mine. Lincoln was still the first successful federal power expansionist and until The Zero was the most successful president in efforts to ignore, flout, vitiate and remake the black letter of the Constitution into whatever suited his own purposes (the first successful implementer of contemporary faux liberals' "living Constitution" concept).

None of that relates in any way to your unresponsive, irrelevant comments.
_________________

BTW, even though your comments don't really deserve it, I'll offer you a little schooling. Using "Lincoln" and "Marxist" in some sort of comparative to The Zero is just silly. Lincoln could not, of course, have been any sort of "Marxist" since he read/spoke no foreign languages and Das Kapital wasn't translated into English until 2 years after his death.

And it's "warfare" not two words. I'll give you the typo on "cleaerer" although you really ought to use a browser with integrated spell checking. Luddite.

I still stick to my owncomments! Since Lincoln was a die hard Chistian Conservative-Not a damn Classfare- share the wealth Marxist,like Obama is!

Lincoln was a Liberal.

Freeing the slaves was an extremely Liberal Idea back in the mid 19th century.

He's rolling over in his grave now!!

He still has time to get assasinated.

Sorry that was really bad taste.

we may think it but can not say it Obama goons are channelling US!!!!! And look for an audit from the IRS and Holder will make a federal case out of it !!!!!!!! Abe did not deserve it either but thinking not saying LOL!!!!

Not really. Matter of opinion.

Abe would be ashamed of Barrack.

Abe may more likely be ashamed of the nation that voted him into office.

Don't think so

How in the world could anyone be proud to have Obama emulate them. Lincoln would roll over in his grave if he could see what's going on.

Hell no. Abe would've had him locked up.

after old ABE gets through throwing up he will calmly say AND THAT SOB THINKS HE IS LIKE ME

You forgot his Socialistic ideas.

and Abe would also say BOY you'll never be like me.

Very Good!

You are right and that would be Faux News.

Yes like this one,