REMEMBER WHEN OBAMA SAID HE WANTED TO EMULATE ABRAHAM LINCOLN?? DO YOU THINK OLD ABE WOULD BE PROUD??
Drue-AFCL
2012/05/05 17:01:43
|
|
|||||
|
26 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
95 votes
|
|
79% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Charge 2012/05/05 20:33:14
Are you looking in the mirror and talking to yourself again?
Put your clothes back on.
Ugh
But HELL NO!
And according to the common wisdom of the time, dark-skinned races were inferior.
Even many of the most vocal Northern abolitionists shared that racist view.
Maybe B.O should remember this quote for Ol' Honest Abe since he so fond of quoting former presidents: " A house divided against itself cannot stand".
He is playing on the ignorance of his voting block.
Lincoln's most vocal opponents were anti-government states-rightist ultra-Conservative Nut Jobs.
And guess what?
Obama's most vocal opponents are anti-government states-rightist ultra-Conservative Nut Jobs.
Saying that everyone must pay their fair share but 47% of Americans don't pay income taxes and his biggest supporter ,Warren Buffet owe billions and refuses to pay.
Sounds like a plan bro!
Republican propagandists like to say that, but Republicans lie a lot you should know that.
How is Obama "pitting class against class?"
Sources . . . Real sources . . . and some lying right wing nut job bs.
OK ???
"If I could save the Union without freeing any slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could do it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also so that"
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.”
Dude was shot,
was he NOT ?!?!
There's a silly goal,
dontchya think ?
SMH, LOL, an'
~ jus'sayin' ~
Peace :0 )
. . . or are baseless insults all you have to offer.
. . . yeah . . that's what I thought.
Seemy YOU support the party dedicated to opposing all progress.
Keystone XL is a fine example of YOU AND YOUR ILK opposing progress.
Why do you think the state of Nebraska absolutely REFUSED to allow the pipeline to run through the state?
Fortunately, we have a far-seeing Democratic administration in place who sees the value in doing a thorough cost benefits analysis of such an undertaking and not just haphazardly give the OK to something that could do such damage.
That's another example of the difference in values between Dems and the Repugs.
Republicans traditionally have ignored the long term safety and security of the nation if that would allow immediate profits to be made by rich and influential political pressure groups.
That behavior brought about the financial crisis. Laissez Faire Reaganism with its hands off governance allowed shady derivatives of derivatives to be created, bought, and sold . . . to the benefit of Wall Streeters and to the detriment of everyone else, including idiotic Republiclones who are too dumb to know what's good for them.
Come on marcuss, admit it . . . what has been the traditional viewpoint of Repulicans on these issues??
Taxation - Avoid it at all costs and thereby build up a huge national debt to pass on to our children.
The Environme...
Why do you think the state of Nebraska absolutely REFUSED to allow the pipeline to run through the state?
Fortunately, we have a far-seeing Democratic administration in place who sees the value in doing a thorough cost benefits analysis of such an undertaking and not just haphazardly give the OK to something that could do such damage.
That's another example of the difference in values between Dems and the Repugs.
Republicans traditionally have ignored the long term safety and security of the nation if that would allow immediate profits to be made by rich and influential political pressure groups.
That behavior brought about the financial crisis. Laissez Faire Reaganism with its hands off governance allowed shady derivatives of derivatives to be created, bought, and sold . . . to the benefit of Wall Streeters and to the detriment of everyone else, including idiotic Republiclones who are too dumb to know what's good for them.
Come on marcuss, admit it . . . what has been the traditional viewpoint of Repulicans on these issues??
Taxation - Avoid it at all costs and thereby build up a huge national debt to pass on to our children.
The Environment -: Exploit it, Destroy it, and let future generations worry about it.
Global Warming - Deny it exists and let our grandchildren deal with its horrible consequences.
When it comes down to it, Right Wingers, who claim to be so moral and family oriented really don't give a damn about the health and welfare of their own Grandchildren.
There is nothing more disgusting than the filthy Right Wing infestation that burdens this nation today.