Remember the Balanced Approach the Democrats and Obama campaigned on?
|
|
|||||
|
13 votes
|
|
14% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
3% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
2% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
2% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
1% | |||
|
74 votes
|
|
78% | |||
Well as it turns out, just like shovel ready jobs weren’t as shovel
ready as they hoped; neither is the balanced approach as balanced.
During the campaign, President Barack Obama indicated he wanted a
balanced approach to avoiding the fiscal cliff and balancing the budget—
an approach that included both new revenue and spending cuts
By now you’ve heard of the “fiscal cliff,” the billions in automatic
spending cuts and tax increases scheduled on Jan. 1 that will affect
virtually every American. Meanwhile, however, an expanding cadre of
Democrats and liberal groups have called on Congress to address the
January tax hikes and spending cuts without making any reductions in
federal benefits or cutting spending in a way that would cause job
losses. That means, well, no cuts in federal spending.
In fact, Obama doubled down, “Barack Obama’s proposal to
avoid the fiscal cliff by boosting revenue by $1.6 trillion over the
next decade would be a “crippling blow” to the economy and leave the
nation’s debt problems unresolved.”Speaker Boehner said.
Not to mention there is no offer to reduce spending, in fact Obama’s
offer increases spending under his 2013 Budget with no offer to reduce
any spending whatsoever.
Once more Barack Obama has no intentions of compromise, and what’s
more; he never did. I guess all the dumb masses that voted for him have
been taken again.
Read More: http://www.followingjohngalt.org/remember-the-bala...
Top Opinion
-
Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL 2012/12/01 13:31:01All of the above+17We all knew it was BS and so the "end" is here....
IMHO....the conservatives should vote "present"
and obama totally own this one.
This will hit home to his devoted followers and
they will see what we have been talking about years.
just sayin........





















You know if you phonies actually worked instead of setting up road blocks, this country would be in better shape. But no you idiots fought Obama every inch of the way. You still lost. lol
Payers expense a total waist of money when all Obie Del sol has to do is get his Jack Boot off the economy by reducing regulations and let people WORK.
As part of its public opinion research, the Pew Research Center surveys attitudes on issues involving the economy, labor, personal finance and consumer behavior. The center collects data through several methods, including public opinion polling, online surveys and empirical studies.
Economic subjects studied have included: the federal deficit; online banking; Americans’ savings habits; the changing status of many consumer products from luxuries to necessities; and the politics of free trade.
The data aid journalists, academics, economic analysts and others in finding out more about how Americans perceive economic issues in general and, at the consumer level, how they approach issues directly affecting their pocketbooks. The latest Pew poll show 76% of all Americans have a favorable rating on the overall economy. Which in my opinion is a direct result in the Christmas shopping numbers being up 5%.
http://www.shadowstats.com/al...
Go ahead and beleive the lies coming out of Washington that is only ment to keep you asleep.
Nothing I posted came from Washington. It came from Pew a well respected polling firm admired by both parties. The sales figures I gave you came from the retailers themselves. Thats the folks who count the money at the end of the day, not some left leaning intrest group.
Your advanced degrees should have afforded you the ablility to know that of the 300 plus citizens here in the United States only 4.3 million are actually on welfare should you choose to look for reality.
I too have advanced degrees. At one time I thought my lifes ambition was to be a professional student. I have never given up on the quest for knowledge and always look for solutions. In the mean time I try to put myself in the positions of those less fortunate than me and never look down my oversized nose which may or may not obstruct my view of them.
A person with morals and standards would rather work than take a handout. Those less fortunate? Give me a break. When people are hungry for food or success they find a means to earn it. People like you think giving them a free cup of coffee will help them out more.
Your bitterness is not that someone is given a helping hand on occassion, your bitterness is because you never perceived you were in a needy enough position to ask.
Maybe your ex-boyfriend or husband never beat you into submission. Maybe you were told all your life by your parents you were the golden child. Maybe just maybe you need to walk a mile in someone elses shoes before you sumarily dismiss the lot as worthless.
You may have agreed to work any hours, weekends, holidays, travel anywhere in the US and commute 100% of your schedule if needed. You cant do that if you have kids or the only caregiver of a mom or dad. If you were in either position, and still agreed to your course of action I feel for the loved ones you left to fend for themselves.
You chose to live your life in black and white and expect others to do the same. Why? No one else is exactly like you and I have to say thank God. We have enough callosed, self righteous, indignant individuals in the world we do not need another with a napoleonic complex.
You claim all of these people are on welfare, but there are only 4.3 million welfare recipeints. You never addressed that. Why?
They're called morals. They don't teach them in school. I know not only did I earn my degrees; I also graduated from the school of hard knocks and I still came our standing.
The Republicans said it was laughable and dismissed it. It may be laughable, but if that is all you hear, then how is that negotiation? This is like buying a house, you offer and they counter. Parties continue until the deal is done. If either party insults the other, chances are the deal would never get done.