Real Change, Not False Hope.
This is a group for Libertarians, Independents and anyone else from any political party that is concerned with the direction of our country and wants serious government reform. Please remain respectful of others and have fun.
URL http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/real-change-not-false-hope/group-11371/
Public News & Politics 464 2009/07/27 18:39:38
Canvas
This was formerly Dan™'s group page for the SodaHead Election:
I placed this here because I think it very neatly summarizes my perspective on the Constitution, and the crisis in government that we are facing at the moment in this country.
I sort of feel like this is our group manifesto. It's not even overtly partisan, although it obviously is written by people who believe that the Constitution is valuable and needs to be respected as the basis of our nation's laws and the fountainhead of all the freedoms that we enjoy.
Please read this short intro from a book I just started reading today, "Who Killed The Constitution?" I think it's worth a few moments of everybody's time.
Thanks,
Dan™
"Many Americans worry that the Constitution is dying. Leading the chorus are those critics, mostly on the Right, who decry activist judges for rendering the Constitution more and more irrelevant with their twisted decisions, which substitute their political preferences for the nation's highest law. In recent years other voices, mostly from the Left, have joined in, deploring President George W. Bush and his administration's supposedly unprecedented attacks on the Constitution.
We have bad news for both sets of critics: The Constitution is already dead. It died a long time ago.
To be sure, every politician claims to admire the Constitution, and government officials must swear to uphold it. But what does their alleged fidelity to the Constitution really amount to in practice?
Nothing.
Even those who bewail our present constitutional crisis miss the much larger story. The assaults on the Constitution are not the work of one branch of government, or of one party, and they did not and could not emerge overnight. Every branch of the federal government has trampled on the Constitution, and has done so for close to a century. The crisis we face today is the culmination of decades of offenses agist the Constitution by Democrats and Republicans, justices, presidents, and congresses alike, all of whom have essentially rejected the idea that the Constitution possesses a fixed meaning limiting the power of the U.S. government.
The idea was not a minor aspect of the Constitution; it was the VERY PURPOSE of the Constitution.
Nowadays, the Constitution is no obstacle to any conceivable federal program. Would you like to have the federal government take over the delivery of health care? No constitutional issue comes to mind. Do you think the federal government should triple spending on cancer research? No problem. Would you like federal agencies promiscuously to mine everyone's e-mail and telephone calls? Why not? Two hundred years ago, even ninety years ago, advocates of such novel federal initiatives would have understood that only by amending the Constitution could the federal government undertake them. Not today. To most Americans -- including politicians of both parties -- all that matters in evaluating a federal initiative is whether is seems like a triumph over injustice, a bold new step toward dealing with a social epidemic, or an important contribution to national security.
But noble intentions can never be the basis for judging whether the federal government is taking proper, constitutional action. In fact, as this book will show, the government has often deformed our Constitution and insidiously subverted the rule of law with precisely those actions that Americans have been taught to celebrate.
The received wisdom on America's recent constitutional history is, unfortunately, almost entirely wrong. That is why a sweeping re-assessment, one that lays bare exactly who killed the Constitution that the Founding Fathers bequeathed us, is necessary.
In this book we chronicle a dozen of the worst examples of the federal government's defiance of the Constitution -- twelve actions from the past century that, taken together, dealt the death blow to the Constitution. This 'dirty dozen' does not represent the federal government's only constitutional assaults, but the offenses documented here reveal exactly how presidents, congressmen, and judges have secured the policies (and the power) they wanted by flouting the Constitution.
Some of the cases we chronicle are well known and the subject of heated debate, while others, no less important, are practically unknown, overlooked in conventional histories. Some of our choices will on the surface be familiar to readers, but the constitutional problems they raise will be surprising simply because standard treatments ignore them. Some of these assaults on the Constitution involve the various branches of government working together, contrary to simplistic accounts that pin the blame on individual actors. And some have long gone unchallenged simply because it is considered taboo even to question certain legislative enactments, Supreme Court rulings, or presidential acts.
For example, a couple of the cases we document involve the highly charged subject of race. People who draw conclusion in that area like the ones we have drawn in this book can be assured of smears and character assassination, regardless of how strong their constitutional arguments are. Since the reigning assumption is that the Constitution does not really matter, the intentions of anyone advancing such arguments are simply assumed to be bad, and their reasoning is therefore ignored. Likewise, those critical of President Bush and his administration's constitutional theories will be accused of 'aiding the terrorists' -- again, regardless of the strength of their constitutional case. Rational discussion of what the Constitution actually says is unusual in such an environment -- and that's just the way the establishment likes it. Every significant appeal to the Constitution, supposedly the fundamental law of the land, is a thought crime of one kind or another. But if we are truly to confront a government that has destroyed our allegedly hallowed Constitution, we must not shy away from calling attention to abuses, regardless of whom it offends.
Why, some may wonder, should we care about the Constitution? Libertarians, for instance, might legitimately ask Isn't 'liberty' all that matters, Constitution or no? But the Constitution contains the very rules that federal officials swear to abide by, and if we are going to have a central government at all, liberty will be best protected in the long run if the Constitution limits federal officials' power. There can be no enduring freedom where government is not bound by a constitution. 'In questions of power, then,' Thomas Jefferson warned, 'let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.'
Otherwise, Jefferson feared government would become arbitrary. He had seen even his good friend and fellow revolutionary John Adamns yield to the authoritarian impulse. He would trust no one in power ever again. Jefferson knew that Rome's republic fell when its ruling class began to ignore the Roman constitution, and he worried that the same fate would befall America. He feared an empire bestriding the world, a government contemptuous even of its citizens' just claims, a basically republican system degenerating into tyranny.
His fears were well founded.
The Constitution has proven inadequate to the task of preventing federal officials from behaving arbitrarily. Now that the restraining elements of the Constitution have been abandoned -- now that the government has, to borrow Jefferson's metaphor, broken free of its chains -- what is left to tether federal officials? Almost nothing. The plain truth is that today we are governed by little more than simple prudence -- governments officials' sense of what they can get away with."
From the introduction to "Who Killed The Constitution?"
by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. & Kevin R. C. Gutzman
My campaign speech has been moved to: http://www.sodahead.com/group/11371/forum/26029/discussion/20...
Link to my campaign blog: http://www.sodahead.com/blog/117939/vote-for-dan-real-change-...
Link to the candidates: http://www.sodahead.com/blog/117947/your-four-candidates-cabi...
Text Graphics by: Safari & http://cooltext.com
I placed this here because I think it very neatly summarizes my perspective on the Constitution, and the crisis in government that we are facing at the moment in this country.
I sort of feel like this is our group manifesto. It's not even overtly partisan, although it obviously is written by people who believe that the Constitution is valuable and needs to be respected as the basis of our nation's laws and the fountainhead of all the freedoms that we enjoy.
Please read this short intro from a book I just started reading today, "Who Killed The Constitution?" I think it's worth a few moments of everybody's time.
Thanks,
Dan™
"Many Americans worry that the Constitution is dying. Leading the chorus are those critics, mostly on the Right, who decry activist judges for rendering the Constitution more and more irrelevant with their twisted decisions, which substitute their political preferences for the nation's highest law. In recent years other voices, mostly from the Left, have joined in, deploring President George W. Bush and his administration's supposedly unprecedented attacks on the Constitution.
We have bad news for both sets of critics: The Constitution is already dead. It died a long time ago.
To be sure, every politician claims to admire the Constitution, and government officials must swear to uphold it. But what does their alleged fidelity to the Constitution really amount to in practice?
Nothing.
Even those who bewail our present constitutional crisis miss the much larger story. The assaults on the Constitution are not the work of one branch of government, or of one party, and they did not and could not emerge overnight. Every branch of the federal government has trampled on the Constitution, and has done so for close to a century. The crisis we face today is the culmination of decades of offenses agist the Constitution by Democrats and Republicans, justices, presidents, and congresses alike, all of whom have essentially rejected the idea that the Constitution possesses a fixed meaning limiting the power of the U.S. government.
The idea was not a minor aspect of the Constitution; it was the VERY PURPOSE of the Constitution.
Nowadays, the Constitution is no obstacle to any conceivable federal program. Would you like to have the federal government take over the delivery of health care? No constitutional issue comes to mind. Do you think the federal government should triple spending on cancer research? No problem. Would you like federal agencies promiscuously to mine everyone's e-mail and telephone calls? Why not? Two hundred years ago, even ninety years ago, advocates of such novel federal initiatives would have understood that only by amending the Constitution could the federal government undertake them. Not today. To most Americans -- including politicians of both parties -- all that matters in evaluating a federal initiative is whether is seems like a triumph over injustice, a bold new step toward dealing with a social epidemic, or an important contribution to national security.
But noble intentions can never be the basis for judging whether the federal government is taking proper, constitutional action. In fact, as this book will show, the government has often deformed our Constitution and insidiously subverted the rule of law with precisely those actions that Americans have been taught to celebrate.
The received wisdom on America's recent constitutional history is, unfortunately, almost entirely wrong. That is why a sweeping re-assessment, one that lays bare exactly who killed the Constitution that the Founding Fathers bequeathed us, is necessary.
In this book we chronicle a dozen of the worst examples of the federal government's defiance of the Constitution -- twelve actions from the past century that, taken together, dealt the death blow to the Constitution. This 'dirty dozen' does not represent the federal government's only constitutional assaults, but the offenses documented here reveal exactly how presidents, congressmen, and judges have secured the policies (and the power) they wanted by flouting the Constitution.
Some of the cases we chronicle are well known and the subject of heated debate, while others, no less important, are practically unknown, overlooked in conventional histories. Some of our choices will on the surface be familiar to readers, but the constitutional problems they raise will be surprising simply because standard treatments ignore them. Some of these assaults on the Constitution involve the various branches of government working together, contrary to simplistic accounts that pin the blame on individual actors. And some have long gone unchallenged simply because it is considered taboo even to question certain legislative enactments, Supreme Court rulings, or presidential acts.
For example, a couple of the cases we document involve the highly charged subject of race. People who draw conclusion in that area like the ones we have drawn in this book can be assured of smears and character assassination, regardless of how strong their constitutional arguments are. Since the reigning assumption is that the Constitution does not really matter, the intentions of anyone advancing such arguments are simply assumed to be bad, and their reasoning is therefore ignored. Likewise, those critical of President Bush and his administration's constitutional theories will be accused of 'aiding the terrorists' -- again, regardless of the strength of their constitutional case. Rational discussion of what the Constitution actually says is unusual in such an environment -- and that's just the way the establishment likes it. Every significant appeal to the Constitution, supposedly the fundamental law of the land, is a thought crime of one kind or another. But if we are truly to confront a government that has destroyed our allegedly hallowed Constitution, we must not shy away from calling attention to abuses, regardless of whom it offends.
Why, some may wonder, should we care about the Constitution? Libertarians, for instance, might legitimately ask Isn't 'liberty' all that matters, Constitution or no? But the Constitution contains the very rules that federal officials swear to abide by, and if we are going to have a central government at all, liberty will be best protected in the long run if the Constitution limits federal officials' power. There can be no enduring freedom where government is not bound by a constitution. 'In questions of power, then,' Thomas Jefferson warned, 'let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.'
Otherwise, Jefferson feared government would become arbitrary. He had seen even his good friend and fellow revolutionary John Adamns yield to the authoritarian impulse. He would trust no one in power ever again. Jefferson knew that Rome's republic fell when its ruling class began to ignore the Roman constitution, and he worried that the same fate would befall America. He feared an empire bestriding the world, a government contemptuous even of its citizens' just claims, a basically republican system degenerating into tyranny.
His fears were well founded.
The Constitution has proven inadequate to the task of preventing federal officials from behaving arbitrarily. Now that the restraining elements of the Constitution have been abandoned -- now that the government has, to borrow Jefferson's metaphor, broken free of its chains -- what is left to tether federal officials? Almost nothing. The plain truth is that today we are governed by little more than simple prudence -- governments officials' sense of what they can get away with."
From the introduction to "Who Killed The Constitution?"
by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. & Kevin R. C. Gutzman
My campaign speech has been moved to: http://www.sodahead.com/group/11371/forum/26029/discussion/20...
Link to my campaign blog: http://www.sodahead.com/blog/117939/vote-for-dan-real-change-...
Link to the candidates: http://www.sodahead.com/blog/117947/your-four-candidates-cabi...
Text Graphics by: Safari & http://cooltext.com
Forums
|
News, polls and blogs about the ongoing attack upon our personal liberty. |
1195 |
|
|
Post links to smear attacks against Tea Parties, Town Hall protests, and all our fellow American citizens who to shut up and sit down. If you have a link to a attack or smear poll that deserves respectful, intelligent refutation, then post it here. |
92 |
|
|
Please respect a few guidelines for posting in this group: don't use this group as a launching point for attack polls, downrave swarms, or flame-wars, or pursuit of personal grievances. Let's stay above all of that and make our case with respectful, intelligent, factual arguments. Thanks. |
109 |
|
|
Send all "fishy stuff" you see or hear about the healthcare takeover in this forum: bigbrother@whitehouse.gov |
28 |
|
|
A forum for any good articles, editorials and opinion pieces from reputable sources. Post anything of quality you want to share with the rest of the group. |
424 |
|
|
Post links to interesting and relevant polls and blogs to share with group members. Thank you. |
3407 |
|
|
This is a forum for blogs, polling data, links, articles and general information about the upcoming 2012 elections. Let's take back America in 2012! Vote the bums out on November 2nd! |
13 |
|
|
A forum for articles, blogs, links and general information about the "Cap And Trade" scheme that is being pushed by the White House and Progressives. |
16 |
|
|
A forum for member rave parties, links to great rave-worthy member comments, and other fun stuff for the group. |
202 |
|
| 70 |
|
Comments
Questions
TRANSPARENCY WE HAVE IT// http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/transparency-yeah-we-ha...5 votes2012/08/02 23:52:50-
THE DOJ AND ACLU WANT HIM OUT.. http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1513/896/NL/Obama_To_Arrest_Sh...32 opinions2011/12/17 01:29:23
-
http://www.sodahead.com/fun/are-you-3-dats-older-than-dirt/qu...12 opinions2011/12/11 02:16:07
-
1. I SUPPORT OWS because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't. 2. I SUPPORT OWS because I believe the ...47 opinions2011/11/13 03:45:27
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx0mF8S-Erk He is 14 and graduated Colorado Collage at 12 and will be a keynote speaker at this years CPAC...4 opinions2010/02/13 15:19:26
there will be an anti socialist Obama, Congress and Senate demonstration, Join with the millions around the Country From 12 noon to 1 in a shutdown, if your in your car pull over and raise the hood, if your at the mall sto...33 opinions2009/10/15 06:55:25
I am not sure that I am even hearing what I am hearing and reading so far about Obama's speech today. I am really concerned at what a bad place we are in right now, home and abroad. I I just wondered if any SH friends have...192 opinions2009/09/23 17:04:00
Almost nothing? Well if these guy's say so, but I there answer is that of cowards. For cowards that would just about right; Almost Nothing!
But what about a true patriot? What would he have to say?
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." ~ Thomas Jefferson
In other words; "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long establis...
Almost nothing? Well if these guy's say so, but I there answer is that of cowards. For cowards that would just about right; Almost Nothing!
But what about a true patriot? What would he have to say?
"We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." ~ Thomas Jefferson
In other words; "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ~ Thomas Jefferson
https://www.sodahead.com/unit...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...