
Rave this if you You're damn sure that Obama and his entire administration SUCK~
angelbaby
2012/06/21 05:09:07
They are ALL a bunch of crooks people.. And they think you're STUPID!
Top Opinion
-
Of Thee I Sing... 2012/06/21 06:15:29


















Don't give up!!!
Let's take care of this in November and be done with it!!
The FACT is that Obama did Not BRING hope to America.. He DID what Democrats do BEST.. He EXPLOITED the hope that was already there.. People WANTED to believe in him.. Many NEEDED to believe in him and they simply weren't willing to listen to ANYTHING that might dash those hopes....
HOPEFULLY,, they have LEARNED the FOLLY of their choice..
It is not over as long as One Man is standing with Fire power ready to fight to the last
********************** IT'S NOT OVER AND AMERICA IS NOT LOST YET *************
I'M STANDING AND I AM NOT BOWING AND I WILL NOT GIVE IN
Mr. Romney is less than perfect but is at least electable. There are others who want to run 3rd party. They haven't carried a single state but think that they can win in November. I doubt it. They will only siphon votes away from whoever is running against obama. A small percentage of just 2-3 percent can tip the scales disasterously in obama's favor by siphoning off a few million votes from whoever is running against him, presumably Romney.
I would much rather have had Herman Cain or Rick Santorum but those gentlemen are out of the race and we should not try to write them in. Same thing with some congressman who did not carry a single state but has not dropped from the race yet.
I voted for a Constitution Party Senator Candidate in 2008 because Gordon Smith of Oregon was a serious RINO and might as well have been a democrat at least half of the time but it was only half the time. In my pisstivity toward Mr. Smith, I voted 3rd party, Constitution Party. Constitution Party got about 3%. Smith got about 47% and the democrat; Merkley won with 48%. He won by only about 1% but had a few hundred thousand of us had voted Smith instead of 3rd party, we would at least have a Senator who votes for both liberal a...
Mr. Romney is less than perfect but is at least electable. There are others who want to run 3rd party. They haven't carried a single state but think that they can win in November. I doubt it. They will only siphon votes away from whoever is running against obama. A small percentage of just 2-3 percent can tip the scales disasterously in obama's favor by siphoning off a few million votes from whoever is running against him, presumably Romney.
I would much rather have had Herman Cain or Rick Santorum but those gentlemen are out of the race and we should not try to write them in. Same thing with some congressman who did not carry a single state but has not dropped from the race yet.
I voted for a Constitution Party Senator Candidate in 2008 because Gordon Smith of Oregon was a serious RINO and might as well have been a democrat at least half of the time but it was only half the time. In my pisstivity toward Mr. Smith, I voted 3rd party, Constitution Party. Constitution Party got about 3%. Smith got about 47% and the democrat; Merkley won with 48%. He won by only about 1% but had a few hundred thousand of us had voted Smith instead of 3rd party, we would at least have a Senator who votes for both liberal and conservative Oregonians. With Merkley, that earsling has not voted in a conservative manner at all. Not once. While Smith was less than perfect, Merkley is completely worthless to a conservative. I look forward to 2014 when I can vote that sonofabitch out of office.
With obama in the White House, we cannot afford to vote principle just because the Republican Candidate is less than perfect. All conservatives need to vote for the strongest chance of removing obama and currently that is Mitt Romney. Trust me, there are others I would have preferred but we can't afford it. A vote for anyone else will be a vote that helps obama.
Next example: World politics.
Just look at the middle east and what is happening in the big picture. We "liberated" Libya, and now it is one of, if not the biggest centers for training and recruiting for Al-Qaeda. Our government supported the regime change in Egypt and now they have the Muslim Brotherhood running the show. After the recent incident between Turkey ans Syria and the current civil war in Syria NATO (Mainly influenced by the USA)is ready to move in and forc...
Next example: World politics.
Just look at the middle east and what is happening in the big picture. We "liberated" Libya, and now it is one of, if not the biggest centers for training and recruiting for Al-Qaeda. Our government supported the regime change in Egypt and now they have the Muslim Brotherhood running the show. After the recent incident between Turkey ans Syria and the current civil war in Syria NATO (Mainly influenced by the USA)is ready to move in and force another regime change. Which will be influenced by guess who, The Muslim brotherhood.
The Muslim brotherhood is an anti American organization, so ask yourself why our government keeps helping put them in powerful positions. Is it really OUR government anymore? Should we really be taking direction from people who are aiding the people that hate us so much? Does "our government" really have our best interest in mind?
ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!
If you have fifty problems and one of them is government, you only have ONE problem.
When we take out the trash, we need to run it through the shredder to be sure it is out.