Of course they are hypocritical but they are also amusing. I love their logic. When this has been brought up before, they become haughty and indignant and respond with comments such as.... " Everyone knows Mitt was born in Utah! " See there ... " everyone knows! That settles it ! Or they will say he revealed all of that back when he ran for the Senate. No... he did not.
In '08, Candidate McCain went after Mitt and his hidden taxes. During the primaries, Rick Perry did the same. Even sleazy old Newt questioned Willard's character. They all know what a venture capitalist and snake oil salesman Mitt is. It's getting pretty bad when Newt pinches his nose when Mitt walks by.
Rave This If You Think The Tea Party Members Are Hypocrites For Not Demanding Mitt Romney's Long Form Birth Certificate, College Transcripts, Tax Returns, and Offshore Bank Account Info ?
Che Guevara - Hero
2012/07/10 11:44:58
|
|
|||||
|
44 votes
|
|
33% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
1% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
1% | ||
|
88 votes
|
|
66% | ||
Rave This If You Think The Tea Party Members Are Hypocrites For Not Demanding Mitt Romney's Long Form Birth Certificate, College Transcripts, Tax Returns, and Offshore Bank Account Info ?
Top Opinion
-
Rebel Yell 2012/07/10 13:16:01
The tea party mantra is derived from hierocracy …
"When fascism comes to this country it will be wrapped in the flag and carry a bible."
Love the Che spin
Not that I agree with the Tea Party.... Them people are CRAZY!
I think that both Romney and Obama are space aliens on a mission of conquest.
Conservatives have ALWAYS been on the wrong side of progress, probably always will.
what a joke she is.
Here's the latest Gallup poll readit and weep.
An overwhelming majority of voters – 75 percent – say that Mitt Romney’s $200 million net worth makes no difference in their choice between him and President Barack Obama, according to a new Gallup poll.
Meanwhile, 20 percent of voters say Romney’s wealth makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
Breaking it down by party affiliation, among Republicans, 89 percent say Romney’s riches make no difference, 8 percent say they are a reason to vote for him, and 4 percent say they are a reason to vote against him. Among Democrats, 62 percent don’t care about Romney’s wealth, 37 percent say it’s a negative factor, and 1 percent say it’s positive.
The sentiment of independents may be most important, as they are likely to decide the election’s outcome. In this demographic 76 are indifferent to Romney’s wealth, 19 percent say it makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
Among income categories, the most indifferen...
Here's the latest Gallup poll readit and weep.
An overwhelming majority of voters – 75 percent – say that Mitt Romney’s $200 million net worth makes no difference in their choice between him and President Barack Obama, according to a new Gallup poll.
Meanwhile, 20 percent of voters say Romney’s wealth makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
Breaking it down by party affiliation, among Republicans, 89 percent say Romney’s riches make no difference, 8 percent say they are a reason to vote for him, and 4 percent say they are a reason to vote against him. Among Democrats, 62 percent don’t care about Romney’s wealth, 37 percent say it’s a negative factor, and 1 percent say it’s positive.
The sentiment of independents may be most important, as they are likely to decide the election’s outcome. In this demographic 76 are indifferent to Romney’s wealth, 19 percent say it makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
Among income categories, the most indifferent toward Romney’s wealth (80 percent) are those earning between $24,000 and $60,000 a year. The most inclined to vote against Romney because of his wealth (28 percent) are those making less than $24,000. And the most likely to vote for Romney because of his wealth (8 percent) are those making between $60,000 and $90,000.
While the Obama campaign seeks to portray Romney as a tool of the rich, “most Americans claim Romney's wealth will not affect their vote, perhaps reflecting Gallup research showing that the majority of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from having a rich class and would themselves like to be rich,” writes Gallup’s Frank Newport.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Gallup: Majority Say Romney’s Wealth Won’t Affect Their Vote.
If you know so much about her account, she must be putting it out there for all to see and therefor paying what she should!
Which is it--has she released this information or not? Or is the right just making more up as they go?
DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz may enjoy attacking Mitt Romney for his use of Swiss bank accounts, but new information suggests she invested in the same institutions some years ago.
Information gathered from Wasserman-Schultz’s congressional disclosure forms show a wide-ranging history of investment ventures, with focuses on Swiss banking firms, foreign pharmaceutical companies, and India’s national bank.
As early as two years ago, she held a 401k with concentrations in European companies and financial institutions.
The revelation comes after weeks of heightened attacks on Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, which Wasserman-Schultz has spearheaded as head of the Democratic Party.
Speaking to the press about Romney last Sunday, she posed the question:
“
"Americans need to ask themselves, why does an American businessman need a Swiss bank account and secretive investments like that?"
Wasserman-Schultz has yet to comment on the apparent hypocrisy of her behavior, and the White House is following suit thus far.
It is also verified by congressional disclosure forms. How's that for change?
On the other hand, it looks more and more like the person who wants to run the country isn't playing fair WITH the country! Inquiring minds (in this case) have a right to know!
Because you have failed to understand the analogy I will explain.
The man in the ski-mask is Obama, because he is the one who looks guilty in this situation. Obama is the one who has actively hidden his past. He has refused to release his school records, adoption records, name-change documents, medical records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as US citizens, and state Bar records.
If we had been asking Romeny for this information for the past 4 years, and Romeny had refused, he would also look guilty. But, that is simply not the case.