Quantcast

Rave this if you think SH conservatives can't do anymore to Obama then rant!

Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer 2012/06/25 17:04:38
1 rant?
2 rants?
3 rants?
I wanna rant some more....
You!
Add Photos & Videos
How many rants does it take to become utterly useless SH conservative, because they can't say anything positive about conservatives and focus way too much on Obama??

whining baby
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/01 15:49:11
    Charge
    +1
    All You Libs do are rants about Romney, so what?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/01 16:07:51
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    +2
    LMAO...

    Who's Lib?

    Still can't say anything? Go ahead.. post another rant... keep proving my point.
  • oldlady Contard... 2012/07/01 19:04:55
  • Contard... oldlady 2012/07/01 19:07:36
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    +1
    Love it...
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/02 21:40:41
    Charge
    You are a Lib... Yes YOU...
    Or a socialist, progressive one of your handy left wing tags You are using this week....
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/02 22:39:11
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Really? Why? Because I don't' agree with right wing extremist?

    Please prove that I'm one...
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/03 11:15:45
    Charge
    How can You "prove" anyone is anything....
    It would be more accurate just to say You are a leftist...
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/03 11:35:57
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    How can you prove your accurate? All you've heard is from someone that doesn't agree with conservatives.

    Yet I supported John Huntsman... But that's not good enough for your kind.... It's has to be your way or else...

    Nobody can have any other mindset... See, that's your problem....

    Get a clue.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/03 11:39:40
    Charge
    You support Obama and what he is doing to this country...
    Then what is Your mindset?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/03 11:52:32
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    No you ASSume I support Obama... because i don't agree with you.

    My mindset... To get this nation united again... To stop all this ideological BS between the partisans...

    Is that leftist? No it's not!
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/03 12:12:43
    Charge
    No, I know You support Obama... You are BS.
    You said,
    http://www.sodahead.com/unite...

    That's BS, all You are doing here is deflecting Obama's record and trying to make the election all about Mitt Romney....
    You say "Obama has opened the door"; Bull, he has been the most devisive and dividing President in my memory.
    Mitt Romney has shown exceptional ability to lead and unite, He has pulled losing situations together and made them succeed; He has shown compassion and the ability to work with opposing ideologies.... none of these has Obama exhibited.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/03 13:28:39
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    LAMO... now how did I know this is what you where exactly going to pull...

    Now let's look at my entire comment...

    ---Obama is the better choice... Why? Because not one man is going to be able to resolve what's wrong... And no I'm not a Lib... I'm coming from this in the middle..

    See I realize it's more then putting a man in office... and from the last 3 1/2 years Obama been doing nothing but dealing with Obstructionist.

    ---The real problem in this nation is Congress and the American people.

    Meaning Congress and Americans like yourself are the problem....

    ---If your divided, how do you expect those who don't agree with your ideology to support your cause.

    Yes how do we deal with division? In your mind, replace all Liberals with conservative.. Problem solved...

    In Liberals minds replace all conservatives with Liberals... problem solved...

    Yet Americans are made up of more then just Liberals or Conservatives.... But you don't seem to get that...


    ---Obama has open the door... You may not like his ideology but at least to me he's proven that he wants us to come together.

    Meaning Obstructionist on the right are the ones not wanting to come together...


    ---On the other side, what has Mitt done to open the door to those who oppose him?

    Yes Mitt worked with Liberals... and Mitt has said many...




    LAMO... now how did I know this is what you where exactly going to pull...

    Now let's look at my entire comment...

    ---Obama is the better choice... Why? Because not one man is going to be able to resolve what's wrong... And no I'm not a Lib... I'm coming from this in the middle..

    See I realize it's more then putting a man in office... and from the last 3 1/2 years Obama been doing nothing but dealing with Obstructionist.

    ---The real problem in this nation is Congress and the American people.

    Meaning Congress and Americans like yourself are the problem....

    ---If your divided, how do you expect those who don't agree with your ideology to support your cause.

    Yes how do we deal with division? In your mind, replace all Liberals with conservative.. Problem solved...

    In Liberals minds replace all conservatives with Liberals... problem solved...

    Yet Americans are made up of more then just Liberals or Conservatives.... But you don't seem to get that...


    ---Obama has open the door... You may not like his ideology but at least to me he's proven that he wants us to come together.

    Meaning Obstructionist on the right are the ones not wanting to come together...


    ---On the other side, what has Mitt done to open the door to those who oppose him?

    Yes Mitt worked with Liberals... and Mitt has said many things publicly that he's reversed himself on.(flip/flop).

    Why should anyone believe anything coming from this man.


    So believe what you want... People like you sicken me.. and it's not a leftist thing... it's an American one.
    (more)
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/03 21:05:30
    Charge
    You knew because you had done it... You knew I knew and would remind You. You knew because You always get caught.
    First, You must be a leftist to think Obama is trying to do anything but have the government control every aspect of your life.
    Obamacare solved NOTHING... there will still be 22-27million without coverage, no controls on actual healthcare costs, no solution for Medicare.... please, they didn't even read the bill before the idiots voted to pass it.
    Second, your statement, "Meaning Congress and Americans like yourself are the problem....", isn't that the opposition of both sides? Your statement just covers the opposing viewpoint.
    What I would really like to know is what door Obama opened, to Communism maybe!
    Obama has evolved "flip/flop" on many things and they are available in his own words.
    Obama has lied about many things, why should we believe him.
    Obama has all but destroyed capitalism in this country, why allow him the time to finish the job?
    Obama does not reflect American values at all.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/04 15:34:00
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Yes get it all out... Feel better to post another Obama rant... LMAO.

    I knew... LMAO... Yes I knew... but you didn't realize I also knew that someone like you would swallow the bait.

    You just don't get it do you.. LMAO...

    I seen what republicans have done... 110th and 111th Senate setting the record number of Filibusters. Now that's something you can't hide...

    Obstructionist GOP senators and Obama have BOTH failed to end this divide of partisan politics...

    It's funny how clueless you are about this, because all you see are Liberals everywhere...

    Boo! ----> there goes a Liberal... Be scared.. LMAO!
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/04 16:32:35
    Charge
    Do you ever say anything worthwhile?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/04 16:56:58
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    LMAO.... so the 110th and 111th RECORD FILIBUSTERING minority Senate isn't worthwhile mentioning...

    LMAO.... Got it.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 13:03:58
    Charge
    You didn't mention that the Dems held a 'super majority' during that period of time and controlled at least one house of the legislature during that time.
    The cloture vote and filibuster was a problem started in 1970.... It has gone both ways and mainly increased on both sides of the isle. Most filibusters were short lived and used to force debate.
    filibuster 1970 ways increased sides isle filibusters lived force debate
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/05 13:48:16
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Didn't feel the need to cover the 'super majority'... Why? Because did they take advantage? I'm sure you'll dig to find something obscure...

    But here's what interesting...

    You show the chart, and it's been pretty much flat line... but doesn't show the numbers since Obama took office...

    I wonder why? Trying to take away the power of my point I see... Deceptive...

    Try again.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 14:01:10
    Charge
    OK, here's an excerpt, please read the whole thing.
    The numbers are either right or wrong... from the senate website.

    When we examine the Senate record since 1989, it’s clear that filibusters are a way of doing business for the minority party. The 107th congress breaks the pattern as a result of a 50/50 split over the two-year period, but the volume of filibusters is still within normal levels to that point.



    The 110th congress was record-setting with its 139 filibusters by the Republicans, but it’s incorrect to say that this was a Republican plan to obstruct President Obama since he had yet to be elected. Consider this another complication in interpreting filibuster data since it’s not realistic to say that Republican Senators were trying to obstruct President Bush’s agenda.

    Filibustering the 111th Congress
    The 111th congress, during President Obama’s first two years, is a bit of a special case. In terms of my methodology, there were several factors that affected whether or not there were 41 Senators in the minority party at any given time, including: one disputed election, two deaths, one resignation, and one party change. While the 111th congress came close to matching the record-breaking filibuster total of the 110th congress, they are spread across both parties, as the followi...





    OK, here's an excerpt, please read the whole thing.
    The numbers are either right or wrong... from the senate website.

    When we examine the Senate record since 1989, it’s clear that filibusters are a way of doing business for the minority party. The 107th congress breaks the pattern as a result of a 50/50 split over the two-year period, but the volume of filibusters is still within normal levels to that point.

    pattern result 5050 split two-year period volume filibusters normal levels

    The 110th congress was record-setting with its 139 filibusters by the Republicans, but it’s incorrect to say that this was a Republican plan to obstruct President Obama since he had yet to be elected. Consider this another complication in interpreting filibuster data since it’s not realistic to say that Republican Senators were trying to obstruct President Bush’s agenda.

    Filibustering the 111th Congress
    The 111th congress, during President Obama’s first two years, is a bit of a special case. In terms of my methodology, there were several factors that affected whether or not there were 41 Senators in the minority party at any given time, including: one disputed election, two deaths, one resignation, and one party change. While the 111th congress came close to matching the record-breaking filibuster total of the 110th congress, they are spread across both parties, as the following chart demonstrates.

    matching record-breaking filibuster total 110th congress spread parties chart demonstrates

    It’s clear to me that someone who claims Republicans have obstructed President Obama with a record number of filibusters simply doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Like just about everything in politics, both parties take advantage of the tools at their disposal to accomplish their ends, and prevent the opposition from accomplishing theirs. Sounds like politics as usual to me.

    http://heathenrepublican.blog...
    (more)
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/05 14:21:23
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    LMAO...

    First lets review FULL facts instead of half truths... or as you call it, taking advantage...

    http://www.senate.gov/pagelay...

    http://www.senate.gov/pagelay...

    Now what's there not to understand since you think your the only one that gets it?

    The record speaks for itself... Reid been doing everything he can to bust the record busting motions. It's amazing to see how many "job" bill that Reid had to file closure on...

    But no... you rather rant and toss Redd Herrings against Obama for ideological partisan advantage..

    See, your not fooling anyone. And I don't expect anything more realistic than ideological psycho pop from you.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 14:34:11
    Charge
    You proved my point, it was done more under the 110th congress (Bush) than the 111th Congress.
    Most of the threats of filibuster weren't done because of the bills themselves but the amendments and riders that were attached without debate.
    This entire argument about the Republicans being obstructionists, because they are defending their values, is a leftist created 'red herring' but fully expected from the master manipulators.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/05 14:49:12
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    LMAO... and you proved my point...

    You avoided that real issues on the filibustering of "job" bills.

    Look at the charts... the proof is there... no manipulation required. Yet, who's the one really manipulating?

    Tell us ole chap how many Job bills have been pass... thus actually helping Americans find jobs? Or is it just about protecting your ideological partisan way of life, and just screw the rest of us?
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 15:44:35
    Charge
    It doesn't matter if the bill had a rider, didn't accomplish what it is titled to or restricted debate and modification.... basically you are saying; "do it my way or no way, from the Democrats".... So why are You whinning so when the system is working the way it was intended to, we were never meant to be a majority ruled society.
    Obama's method of spending taxpayer money on his crazy plans has not worked, the Government can NOT create lasting jobs.... period.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/05 16:12:36
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    OMG... you can lead a horse to water...

    You ever think why it's come down to this? The ideological divide?

    Our best years were when we ALL worked together... Both sides have swallowed the poison pill of decent...
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 17:29:10
    Charge
    Some saw the power that can be formed from division; in a Free Republic that power can be authoritarian.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/05 18:22:56
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Yes... I know... George Washington understood that. Yet you seemingly support partisan ideology...

    You know it's wrong... but still you support divide.

    Here's a little of what I've learn on SH about one of our most intellectual founders..

    ---While Washington accepts the fact that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups like political parties, he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and take revenge on political opponents.

    Again Both parties have displayed this!
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/05 23:15:19
    Charge
    So You favor authoritarianism?
    or dictatorship?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 11:10:45
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    I don't favor either...

    Did Washington?
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 15:08:32
    Charge
    Well what do You favor?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 17:43:25
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Unity.... A United States again... One nation... you know?
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 17:51:38
    Charge
    OK, but when were we that? There has always been difference of opinion, i.e. the Civil war over states rights?
    Once we gained our independence and the constitution was adopted we saw the differences in feelings and opinions; how would You eliminate those differences?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 19:33:09
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    You know about 45 years ago, we where a nation... we had our differences but we over came and compromised.

    In the 90's it changed forever... the divided widen and even through differences still were resolved, the course of hate was set in stone.

    Today we have lost the ability to compromise.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 20:37:35
    Charge
    We come together when challenged as a nation; however the divide has been there ever since Woodrow Wilson...
    There is one party that has decided to divide the country into minorities,the rich and the poor, the worker and the executive.. it's a strategy that is well tested and proven in the past.... create a demon and blame everything that happens on that opposition. That state of mind has been allowed to be part of our childrens education, and it has been aimed at the kindness and guilt of the American people, if that continues to work we are doomed as a country.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 20:42:39
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Oh boy, how did I know it would just come back to blaming one party...

    You really didn't think I would see what your up to...
    LMAO...

    No, I'm not going to blame one party... BOTH SUCK..
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 20:52:44
    Charge
    You are right, but there is one party that has adapted this tactic as a platform.... don't tell me that both parties have the exact same approach to votes.... they don't. I blame both parties as well... but they are simply playing the same game.
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 20:55:37
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    No slick, doesn't work that way.. Don't ever try to put words in my mouth...

    That's what deceptive people do. And that's why YOUR party can't be trusted.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 21:00:27
    Charge
    Look slippery, I didn't try to put words in Your mouth at all.
    I'm just trying to find out how You would get from point A to point B in Your utopia.
    What's YOUR party????? or don't You have one Your willing to admit?
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 21:01:46
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    Admit what?

    Independents pick from all parties.
  • Charge Contard... 2012/07/06 21:15:52
    Charge
    Independent my Butt, You are a Liberal and You know it.... LMAO.....
    What You trying to do is simply say, give up Your ideology and follow mine....
    LMAO......
  • Contard... Charge 2012/07/06 21:32:40
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    No... you don't get it...

    I like fiscal conservative ideals, but I think their conservative socialist ways are something I can never support.

    See I can take something from all parties and not swallow the lemming poison pill that converts all of ya into lemmings.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 08:29:27

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals