I will "created a taxpayer funded jobs stimulus bill [$861 Billion dollars] that will jump-start the economy by creating 3.5 to 4 million shovel-ready jobs, 90% in the private, and hold unemployment below 8%
How about transparency in his Administration? Said CNN would be right there. Only transparency was the glimpse of their arse before they closed the doors
OneBigAssMistakeAmerica..If that is not clear ponder this...EVERYONE lies for him. Not only does he lie BUT his whole administration is made of liars Jay Carney AND criminal ERIC HOLDER. No President has done more to hurt America than OBAMA and his gang of leftover 60's radicals.
romney want remember anything. he try and cover up everything. let him in and you will see crime rise even more than it is. we will all be poor unless you have as much money as he has.
If he gets that second term we're screwed! He'll exceed his handler's expectations! He'll single handedly destroy the U.S. much like he's planned on doing all of his adult life. Soros and company will be oh-so-proud of his "accomplishments".
Just on those 3 points alone he pretty much passes the test.
The above are facts, he clearly isn't causing America harm and if you want to go down a critical route you can say he's not done enough in office in his 1st term.
You genuinely have no basis to even ask this question, there have been so many worse US Presidents.
I would like to go on record saying everything you've said is BS! You are severally misinformed, and or are using the fact the the wars are not officially declared to call them a war. You want damage? How about all the Executive Orders that have been either drafted or ReDrafted in the last five months. NDAA,NDRP,Hr-347,EO 13563. How do you consider any other that NOT damaging? And just in case anyone is about to come back with EO's are not law. YOUR WRONG. Ruffly starting in the 1950 Executive Order has been gaining power to the point it is at today called "Executive Legislation". And carries the SAME WEIGHT as Congressional Law. Executive Order is NOT automatically brought before The Supreme Court or Congress. Congress must act on Executive Order passed. And can only ratify said EO. Or pass a Bill with a SuperMajority, that has only happed Twice in our Nations History. And once an EO is ratified it carries the same weight as Congressional Law. And takes the actions of a Constitutional Amendment to fix. How about the fact the Executive Order is creating a Federal Government that is beyond reproach. That SEVERELY damages our Constitution. More specifically our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. From entering in to treaties with the U.N that will ultimately leave o...
I would like to go on record saying everything you've said is BS! You are severally misinformed, and or are using the fact the the wars are not officially declared to call them a war. You want damage? How about all the Executive Orders that have been either drafted or ReDrafted in the last five months. NDAA,NDRP,Hr-347,EO 13563. How do you consider any other that NOT damaging? And just in case anyone is about to come back with EO's are not law. YOUR WRONG. Ruffly starting in the 1950 Executive Order has been gaining power to the point it is at today called "Executive Legislation". And carries the SAME WEIGHT as Congressional Law. Executive Order is NOT automatically brought before The Supreme Court or Congress. Congress must act on Executive Order passed. And can only ratify said EO. Or pass a Bill with a SuperMajority, that has only happed Twice in our Nations History. And once an EO is ratified it carries the same weight as Congressional Law. And takes the actions of a Constitutional Amendment to fix. How about the fact the Executive Order is creating a Federal Government that is beyond reproach. That SEVERELY damages our Constitution. More specifically our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. From entering in to treaties with the U.N that will ultimately leave our Sovereignty in the hands of a higher court. Just on the first of THIS month the last EO I mentioned 13563 Declares International Law in the United States. And through various security agreements U.N and Foreign Troops will be brought in to ENFORCE said EOs on the people of this country.So....please explain to me what the hell isn't damaging about any of that. Here is a link to the Federal Registry. Go look up and interperate for your self. http://www.archives.gov/feder...
get a fin clue. What Fed up boat did you just get off of? Yeah they are all dysfunctional dipstick. That's the point, bottom line get a clue. Not another news quip.
so libya dosent count as a war? can you really count something that hasn't really happened yet? does it really matter if the GDP is going up if the national debt is going up with it? can you come up with three points that are better?
No Libya was not a war, in any shape or form, it was a NATO intervention led by European and Qatari aircraft to enforce a UN endorsed no fly zone.
No American lives were in danger, it was not a war in any form period.
Can I count soomething that hasn't happened yet?
You think he's about to declare war in an election year?
He was decisive on getting American troops out of Iraq and has sped up the withdrawal in Afghanistan.
Does it matter if GDP is going up if National Debt is as well?
National debt would be immensely higher if GDP was going the other way, of course it's a good thing GDP is going up otherwise you would have a shrinking economy with higher welfare costs.
I don't see your counter argument that he's the worse president ever.
Okay If libya wasent a war what about the "drone war" in Yemen? I think they should still be counted as a wars even though American lives aren't in danger, because there are still people dying. What I meant by something that hasent happend yet is that even though the war has suposidly ended we still have troops in Iraq, as well as Afghanistan. Do I think he's going to declare a war in an election year? No I don't because he cant declare a war, that's the job of congress, and that would be political suicide for him. I do think he could start or support other undeclared wars like in Yemen or libya. I never said that he was the worst presiden ever I just wanted to point out that he isen't as good as you made him sound.
we do have a shrinking economy. please take some economics courses
and just how has he sped up the withdrawal from afghan?? didn't he send in an additional 30k or 40k troops? and which action did he say that he would have us out of within a year if he was elected? I think it was more like 3 years
I did take an economics course at LSE, granted I dropped out in my 3rd year to concentrate on politics and law but here's the key factor in determining the state of an economy: GDP.
GDP and inflation are the 2 key indicators along with utility prices.
GDP is growing each quarter, if the economy was shrinking it would be minus GDP growth (Like you saw in 08).
You know fine well he has pledged a stern strategy on Afghan withdrawal just like he did with Iraq.
sorry but a gdp hovering a bit less than 3% is not moving us in the right direction. we are losing ground every day that the rate does not exceed 4%. there are numerous externalities that are not taken into account in the governments' figuring of the gdp, but which figure greatly in determining real growth.
yes, his pledge in getting us out of iraq was so stern that it went from a year to three years. nothing like making a pledge that you cannot keep
If he gets that second term we're screwed! He'll exceed his handler's expectations! He'll single handedly destroy the U.S. much like he's planned on doing all of his adult life. Soros and company will be oh-so-proud of his "accomplishments".
http://pearly-abraham.tripod....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
How many wars is he pulling America out of? 2
Is America's GDP going up? Yes
Just on those 3 points alone he pretty much passes the test.
The above are facts, he clearly isn't causing America harm and if you want to go down a critical route you can say he's not done enough in office in his 1st term.
You genuinely have no basis to even ask this question, there have been so many worse US Presidents.
can you really count something that hasn't really happened yet?
does it really matter if the GDP is going up if the national debt is going up with it?
can you come up with three points that are better?
No American lives were in danger, it was not a war in any form period.
Can I count soomething that hasn't happened yet?
You think he's about to declare war in an election year?
He was decisive on getting American troops out of Iraq and has sped up the withdrawal in Afghanistan.
Does it matter if GDP is going up if National Debt is as well?
National debt would be immensely higher if GDP was going the other way, of course it's a good thing GDP is going up otherwise you would have a shrinking economy with higher welfare costs.
I don't see your counter argument that he's the worse president ever.
and just how has he sped up the withdrawal from afghan?? didn't he send in an additional 30k or 40k troops? and which action did he say that he would have us out of within a year if he was elected? I think it was more like 3 years
GDP and inflation are the 2 key indicators along with utility prices.
GDP is growing each quarter, if the economy was shrinking it would be minus GDP growth (Like you saw in 08).
You know fine well he has pledged a stern strategy on Afghan withdrawal just like he did with Iraq.
yes, his pledge in getting us out of iraq was so stern that it went from a year to three years. nothing like making a pledge that you cannot keep
what an idiot you are