They are no better than the Taliban or Al Qaeda and should be treated as such.
RAVE THIS if you think conservatism is un-American
Mopeder
2012/07/04 22:16:58
|
|
|||||
|
23 votes
|
|
34% | |||
|
7 votes
|
|
10% | |||
|
37 votes
|
|
55% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Che Guevara - Hero 2012/07/05 00:52:35Yes
+13Half the Conservatives on SH are threatening the violent overthrow of our Constitutionally Elected Government. The US Military is killing scum like them in Afghanistan every day.
They are no better than the Taliban or Al Qaeda and should be treated as such.
Liberals gather in a corner, laughing in a sinister manner... "We got to up our game! How about instead of 'racist' we go straight to 'Nazi'?"
Maybe it will work for you. Anything to hide the fact that your president is an un-patriotic, Constitution-hating, border-dissolving, apologist loser (like the French during WWII)...
Hahahahaha! Good job, guys!
America is and will always be a Conservative Nation. Deal with it libbies.
Conservative:
RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION
RESPECT FOR LIFE
PERSONAL & FISCAL RESPONSIBLITY
LIMITED GOVERNMENT
GOD, COUNTRY AND FAMILY FIRST.
You cannot get more American than that.
Proud to be a Conservative.
You will be on Grow up someday.
Have a lovely day.
The SCOTUS ruled its not unconstitutional you need a reality check..
Likewise.
I'll wait.
When you go to bed tonight thank my husband who is over seas fighting for your RIGHTS and your FREEDOMS/LIBERTIES.
There's only one who comes to mind that doesn't block anyone.... just as I wont.
Where in the Constitution does it say that the Federal Government can FORCE people to purchase something they do not want?
As Joe Wilson would say... YOU LIE
You've had me blocked for as long as I can remember.
Ya know, it's a dead giveaway when I waste my time typing a response only to get the "user declines" message when I hit 'submit'.
If Congress passes a law and the SCOTUS finds it constitutional then it is.. Duh To much to comprehend is it...
Still waiting****
Obviously not though..
The SCOTUS did in fact rule 9-0 that the Federal govt. does NOT have the authority under the Constitution to force citizens to purchase a product or service.
This may come as a shock but they ruled against the WH attorney's argument for the Commerce Clause, and ruled it was a Tax.
You can lie or spin it all you want to.. I don't give a rats ass if they said it was a tax or not they upheld that portions of it..
The mandate was shot down 9-0 in relation to the Commerce Clause which is what the WH attorneys were claiming made it Constitutional.
The mandate was allowed as a TAX which falls under the 16th amendment which gave Congress the authority levy taxes on incomes, which 0nozo and the rest of the clown crew kept insisting it was not. Another broken promise and abject LIE.
The Medicaid expansion was ruled down and states do NOT have to participate which will destroy 0bozoTax anyway.
The Federal govt. doesn't have the funds to add all these people onto the State Medicaid roles and pay for it out of taxpayer funds. and with the ruling, cannot force the states to pay for it either..... result..... millions of people hanging in limbo who still don't have any coverage and never will under this plan. They would however have to pay a fine if they didn't come up with something or be hounded by the IRS.
It will be completely de-funded and scrapped in 2013 and a REAL reform law installed to take effect immediately.
The Supreme Court largely upheld President Obama’s health care law, the Affordable Care Act, in a mixed decision. The conservative chief justice, John G. Roberts, joined the majority in affirming the central legislative accomplishment of Mr. Obama’s term.
Chief Justice Roberts ruled that the key provision in question, the so-called individual mandate requiring all Americans to buy insurance or pay a fine, failed to pass constitutional muster under the Commerce Clause, which was the heart of the administration’s arguments in favor of it. But the chief justice declared that the fine amounted to a tax that the government had the power to impose, and that the mandate could survive on that basis.
The decision did significantly restrict one major portion of the law: the expansion of Medicaid, the government health-insurance program for low-income and sick people. The ruling gives states some flexibility not to expand their Medicaid programs, without paying the same financial penalties that the law called for.
As it says the law failed under the Commerce Clause but was UPHELD ( do you understand that word?) as a tax so the Mandate survives that was the Key to the law..... As for the rest of your post its nothing but your assumptions.. Asses make assumption everyday on here.
"The SCOTUS did in fact rule 9-0 that the Federal govt. does NOT have the authority under the Constitution to force citizens to purchase a product or service."
The Court affirmed the mandate as constitutional as a tax get your facts straight boy.
Copies and pastes something that says the exact same thing I wrote and doesn't even realize it.
I'm sure he gave himself a fist-bump, high-five and spiked his mouse.