Rave this if you don't want the Tea Party terrorists revising history!
|
|
|||||
|
46 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
52 votes
|
|
53% | |||

A little more than a year after the conservative-led state board of education in Texas approved massive changes to its school textbooks to put slavery in a more positive light, a group of Tea Party activists in Tennessee has renewed its push to whitewash school textbooks. The group is seeking to remove references to slavery and mentions of the country's founders being slave owners.
According to reports, Hal Rounds, the Fayette County attorney and spokesman for the group, said during a recent news conference that there has been "an awful lot of made-up criticism about, for instance, the founders intruding on the Indians or having slaves or being hypocrites in one way or another."
"The thing we need to focus on about the founders is that, given the social structure of their time, they were revolutionaries who brought liberty into a world where it hadn't existed, to everybody -- not all equally instantly -- and it was their progress that we need to look at," Rounds said, according to The Commercial Appeal.
During the news conference more than two dozen Tea Party activists handed out material that said, "Neglect and outright ill will have distorted the teaching of the history and character of the United States. We seek to compel the teaching of students in Tennessee the truth regarding the history of our nation and the nature of its government."
And that further teaching would also include that "the Constitution created a Republic, not a Democracy."
The group demanded, as they had in January of last year, that Tennessee lawmakers change state laws governing school curricula. The group called for textbook selection criteria to include: "No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers, or the majority of citizens, including those who reached positions of leadership."
The latest push comes a year after the Texas Board of Education approved revisions to its social studies curriculum that would put a conservative twist on history through revised textbooks and teaching standards.
The Texas revisions include the exploration of the positive aspects of American slavery, lifting the stature of Jefferson S. Davis to that of Abraham Lincoln, and amendments to teach the value of the separation of church and state were voted down by the conservative cadre. Among other controversial amendments that have been approved is the study of the "unintended consequences" of affirmative action.
The board approved more than 100 amendments affecting social studies, economics and history classes for Texas's 4.8 million students.
The influence of the amended textbooks will likely reach far beyond the state of Texas. The state is one of the largest purchasers of textbooks, and many other states adopt Texas's books and standards.
The curriculum changes were pushed through by a majority bloc of conservative Republicans on the Texas school board, who have said the changes were made to add balance to what they believe was a left-leaning and already-skewed reflection of American history.
"There is some method to the madness besides vindicating white privilege and making white students feel as though they are superior and privileged and that that it is the natural order of things," Gary Bledsoe, president of the Texas State NAACP, told The Crisis magazine last year about this time. "The agenda being pushed and the ultimate impact intended is to make young people automatically identify with one political party."
A number of groups, including the NAACP, the Texas League of United Latin American Citizens and the Texas Association of Black Personnel in Higher Education have joined forces to beat back the measures, which they said would have a negative impact on minority children.
The groups sought a federal review of the state's public education and have raised claims that the Texas State Board of Education has violated federal civil rights laws. In a formal complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Education, the groups charge that the new curriculum was devised to "discriminate."
The measures went as far as to replace instances of the trans-Atlantic slave trade with "Atlantic triangular trade."
"It is going to be extremely psychologically harmful to African-American young people because they are marginalized in the curriculum," Bledsoe said. "It will require them to be taught things such as the benevolence of slavery and the problems with affirmative action rather than the good and the bad."
"They voted down a motion that requires students to be taught about the terrorism brought about by the Ku Klux Klan and what they did to ethnic and racial minorities, but they turn around and pass a provision that requires the teaching of the violence of the Black Panther Party."
Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/tea-party...
Top Opinion
-
Jester M.S. 2012/07/05 04:36:31Nah, I'm comfortable with the Tea Party changing history to suit their politi...+36I agree with some of their ideals and disagree with others, about like any other political movement. They get especially ostracized by the media for some reason, whereas equally aggressive grassroots movements on the opposite side of the political divide draw almost no notice.





















In other words, we thought & believed these things BEFORE Fox, & BEFORE Beck was a glimmer in his parent's eyes. We finally found people who were resonating with what we KNEW to be the truth, not the way the liberal media wanted us to believe. It is "adorable" that there are at least 4 times more left-wing media stations than there are right-wing, & yet libs continue to focus on the ONE. Poor little babies, wah wah wah . . . "I can't think of anything intelligent to say, so I'll throw out Fox & Beck & see what sticks! I sure hope they buy it, 'cause that's all I got."
Where I sit, progressives promote moral relativism, statism, socialism, entitlements, reparations, white guilt, open borders, de-militarizing, the US C...&&&
Where I sit, progressives promote moral relativism, statism, socialism, entitlements, reparations, white guilt, open borders, de-militarizing, the US Constitution & Bible are myths & old-fashioned, only for the weak & feeble-minded, and it is a travesty for anyone to be above poverty level, unless it's professional athletes or Hollywood stars. Is this seriously the third world country you envision for our us and our children? Serious?
Say more things, yer crackin' me up.
Also, you can save the pictures sir. I am much more engaged by conversation and I do not require a visual aid as a crutch.
Are you for equality here?
So long as they do not break the law, they are fine in my book.
That is what happens when organizations like them play with fire. They act shocked when they are closely monitored by law enforcement and claim harassment, but if they conducted themselves in a more professional manner they would not be on the radar to begin with.
They should be monitored very closely, they congregated in large patrols in FLA harrasing those who had "support neighborhood watch" signs in their windows. Rocks broke those windows.
It seems to me that the standards for probable cause and evidence are much higher when dealing with these types of organizations. The DOJ under the Obama administration has handed down numerous directives which makes the job of federal law enforcement much more challenging. This should come as no surprise beings that he comes from a town like Chicago, which is riddled with high rates of homicide and violent crime in general. Being soft on violent offenders and weak on giving investigators the tools to do their job is a recipe for disaster.
I think his generalized attitude towards federal law enforcement is a contributing factor in the so named "fast and furious" scandal.
I pray for all of our law enforcement and our military, their hands are tied by their own government.
I'm so sad the "rules of engagement" are being played against you.
Thanks :)
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire-Ce qui plaît aux dames
I get the impression you wish to silence those you disagree with? I think a marketplace of ideas where all are free to submit their thoughts is the best policy. Let people make up their own minds. Dogmatic views is what we can thank republicans and democrats for, and look how much division and turmoil that has created in our country. People who are unwilling to even consider the possibility that their viewpoints may be flawed are the true slaves of contemporary society.
" People who are unwilling to even consider the possibility that their viewpoints may be flawed are the true slaves of contemporary society".
Now where have i even shied away from a healthy debate, in fact i look up everything when some one makes a statement, so that little left over dribble is just that dribble.
Now if you want proof, i can show you proof all day, but you wont here me stretching out the truth like some on here.