Rave this if You Do NOT Want Obamacare!

Good im glad there are lots of politicians I don't agree with or care for as well but to lower yourself to make debased and racialized jokes goes too far. This is why people accuse others of racism in the republican party it's giving us a bad name and more people ought to be in uproar.

lol it's just a gag

Go away.

I've been away for awhile. Whats with the "Rave This" nonsense. Get back to posting thought provoking topics and stop hawking the raves. Good Night Nurse. I think I'll go away some more. PS - You haven't earned a rave.

Go away for good.

Duh!

Do I want Obamacare ?

piss on obama and his obamacare

exactly,seems like everyone is pissing on him.

RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE - RAVE !

I DO NOT WANT OBAMACARE!!!

Pay for your own if you want it.

That's the problem, Hun.... NOTHING out there is AFFORDABLE!

We afford ours for our family of 4. Actually we can't afford not to have it.

hear ya

Raved. I want them to sit down, go back to the drawing board, and do it right. Read the bill before you push it through congress and the House.

Oh you like my questions now? You reported me for making questions you don't like but you'll rave the ones you do like? Figures.

You have your off days. I was surprised as well. If I can reply...I will. Loaded questions I report. I expect the liberals on this site to do the same thing to loaded conservative questions. Loaded questions are a plague here. Sorry.

If I didn't love Obamacare, I wouldn't have said so many nice things about it.
http://lostliberty1.wordpress...
http://lostliberty1.wordpress...
http://lostliberty1.wordpress...
http://lostliberty1.wordpress...
http://lostliberty1.wordpress...

Mitt Romney created "Obamacare" in Massachusetts and its working very well. When the suggestion was first posed, Democrats were very hesitant on the mandate, but Hilary Clinton saw the necessity of it, and Obama followed after he took office. Republicans have, since, took the stance against the mandate for the purposes of juxtaposing the two parties and taking advantage of the public's lack of understanding about the topic.

A health care system like this would be very successful, I think. While America has the newest and most advanced technology and medicine, as well as the highest standards for doctors, we rank 37th on "best medical systems." This means that, despite our innovations, they are not reflected in the citizens. This is because many people are uninsured or under-insured, and this reveals itself in our infant mortality rates and relatively low life expectancy.

On the other hand, France, with the #1 health care system in the world, provides care to all of its citizens. Approximately 80% buy additional insurance if they can afford it. Because it combines national health care with the free-market insurance most states have currently, everyone has basic health insurance, and companies also have the funding to provide high-quality services. The success is aesthetically obvious, but it can also be seen in how many doctors visits they generally have each year (6, compares to our 1) and their shorter waits and lines.

So... I'm pro-"Obamacare"

Mitt Romney is no good. He's owned and operated by the same globalist gangsters that own and operate Obama. Once again, the American people will have no choice in November with each candidate vying to be the one who drives the last nail in America's coffin.

W Bush was, undeniably, a puppet. Mitt Romney is, in fact, less so. He adjusts to what he thinks his state or his nation wants, and he has certainly tried forcing himself into the Republican mold, but I think he has some intelligence. Obama is not a puppet, though. As he has recently shown, he is willing to take a stance, even when it's risky, and he's made tough decisions.

I wouldn't believe any of this nonsense if I hadn't just seen that flock of pigs fly over.

OMG ?

America has the newest and most advanced technology and medicine because that's a good part of what the money that goes from the insurance company, and your premiums, pay for. So, how are France's hospitals and doctors? I know when my Italian uncle had his family visiting from Italy, the first thing they did was take a tour of our hospitals; he's a doctor. And they were amazed by them.

However, with Obamacare, the insurance companies will be forced to refund any money that is in excess, during successful months. That is a problem.

There's room for improvement everywhere, still our (French) hospitals and doctors seem to provide adequate service. Our vital statistics are not any worse than yours, like our life expectancy.

True, there is room for improvement, everywhere.

I don't personally have statistics measuring the hospitals or doctors of France, but I know that the citizens are considered the healthiest in the world. They go to the doctor more frequently for check-up, spend more time with the doctor so that they can be thorough, and spend less time waiting to be seen by a doctor in emergencies. I'm sorry I don't have more information on hand, but that would be a good thing to research later.

Research is always good.

The healthcare situation I have now is very successful for me and I don't need the government doing anything to mess it up.

The government will hardly effect your healthcare situation. Assuming you stay with your healthcare provider, I don't think anything will change other than a potential to save money, because practices will be less corrupted by the free market.

Up until the changes that Obamacare calls for run private insurance companies out of business, potentially.

Well said

Thank you.

Obamacare is going to be history just like Obama,

Is Romneycare history?

What they do on a state level is their problem.

Mitt Romney created "Obamacare" in Massachusetts and its working very well. When the suggestion was first posed, Democrats were very hesitant on the mandate, but Hilary Clinton saw the necessity of it, and Obama followed after he took office. Republicans have, since, took the stance against the mandate for the purposes of juxtaposing the two parties and taking advantage of the public's lack of understanding about the topic.

A health care system like this would be very successful, I think. While America has the newest and most advanced technology and medicine, as well as the highest standards for doctors, we rank 37th on "best medical systems." This means that, despite our innovations, they are not reflected in the citizens. This is because many people are uninsured or under-insured, and this reveals itself in our infant mortality rates and relatively low life expectancy.

On the other hand, France, with the #1 health care system in the world, provides care to all of its citizens. Approximately 80% buy additional insurance if they can afford it. Because it combines national health care with the free-market insurance most states have currently, everyone has basic health insurance, and companies also have the funding to provide high-quality services. The success is aesthetically obvious, but it can also be seen in how many doctors visits they generally have each year (6, compares to our 1) and their shorter waits and lines.

So... I'm pro-"Obamacare"