Tell me, what is different about these rifle than any other rifle? They employ the use of lightwieght metals and polymer. They shoot the same ammunition. They are semi-automatic, but so are many hunting rifles. They can be fitted with long range scopes, but so can any old hunting rifle. What makes them "assault rifles"? The way they look? Because they shoot bullets? Because they can kill efficiently? So can all hunting rifles! You aren't gonna stop with these, Carol and you know it. You are just STARTING with these!
Don't lie to us! It ain't any of your business. The problem isn't the guns, but the nuts behind them and the most dangerous person with a firearm is a Progressive (Regressive) in a position of POWER! HITLER, STALIN, MAO, POL POT were ALL Progressives (Regressives) who enslaved people and then used the POWER of the GUN to ELIMINATE ALL those who stood as a threat to their POWER!!!
Rave this if you are for banning assault rifles.
Carol
2012/12/17 18:22:38
|
|
|||||
|
230 votes
|
|
37% | |||
|
333 votes
|
|
54% | |||
|
52 votes
|
|
8% | |||
Do you really need this gun for the shooting range?
The second amendment was about Americans being able to defend themselves against a tyrannical government. What the hell do you think we have now? And now the big push is to disarm us. How convenient.
I'm glad someone besides me understands that arms like the AR-15, which are particularly good for killing people, are also particularly good at killing people in self-defense - which is what they were designed for, and what our military uses them for.
Our government knowingly allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor. How many innocent people killed? Reason. To get Americans emotionally involved in going to war.
Gulf of Tonkin. Non event created to get America involved in the war against North Vietnam.
911. Planned and staged event to create the bogus war on terror. Reason. To get Americans emotionally involved in finding Osama Bin Laden and invading Afghanistan. Additional reason. To get Americans fearful and accepting of an erosion of our rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Mass shootings. Reason. To attack our second amendment and get Americans emotionally involved in gun control. The goal. To disarm us according to the UN and Globalist agenda so then we will be defenseless.
Do you want freedom or slavery? Think about that carefully.
Moreover, I will happily fight you to your death for my rights. I'm an Iraq/Afghanistan vet. I went to war to fight for the rights of Americans. I've fought people bigger, badder, and better armed than you. I stand before you, a free man.
We protect our money with guns. We protect our children with words on paper, words on signs, and good intentions. Professional tip: THE MONEY IS SAFE!
Having someone present, who is armed and trained, will make it possible for that person to stop an active shooter. Putting more words on paper won't do anything.
The "assault weapon ban" that is being discussed won't remove any guns from the hands of anyone, period. The only way to stop violence by removing arms from people's hands is to succeed in removing ALL of the arms that can possibly hurt people. This is not possible.
Guns will always be accessible by bad people.
If you are unarmed, and an armed, trained person picks a fight with you, he will win that fight 100% of the time.
Unless you protect yourself, or someone else is protecting you, you are a target for victimization.
In regards to the difference between hunting rifles and assault rifles, of course the basic principles apply, barrel, receiver and stock, but the way you reload seems to be an issue with the description. For a deer rifle, if you miss, the deer is likely gone, the need to reload forty rounds is not necessary. In assaulting a large number of people, some of whom might object, violently, high capacity and reloading quickly is a high priority. Anyone who does not understand that is either stupid or a liar.
Ever make a gun? It's not actually particularly difficult.
Knowing that crazy people can always get guns, why aren't you armed? If you're unarmed, and someone who is armed and trained picks a fight with you, they will win that fight 100% of the time.
The only way to stop someone with a gun from using it for bad things, is to have other good people with guns, ready to do bad things to bad people.
Laws can only be enforced after they are broken. Police will probably only show up after your encounter with an armed person as taken place.
You're right. Completely.
The only way to stop crime from happening, that involves removing guns, is to succeed in removing all of them, and THEN succeed in removing the means to import them into society or make them. This is impossible.
Our money is protected by armed guards. Our children are protected by words on paper (laws), words on signs (gun free zones), and good intentions. The money is pretty safe.
'before putting energy into a gun ban, let's be smart and ban gun images in all media - including video games.....and then ban psychiatric 'medicines' ...'
http://www.halfpasthuman.com/...
That is also unacceptable.
Even the military base that was attacked was unable to stop the murders with numerous armed military personel on base when the attacker opened fire. To think that any civilian could do any better is absolute stupidity.
You think our troops overseas should only carry 10 shot pump action or semi-automatic guns because they shouldn't be committing mass murder?
Hell no! I carried machine guns in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I never murdered anyone with those!
All ARMS, as protected by THE BILL OF RIGHTS, are for killing people. All other uses besides killing people are secondary, illegitimate, and only exploit a loophole in the bill of rights. This is not my opinion - this is fact.
ARMS are for KILLING PEOPLE. All other uses are secondary and illegitimate. This is not my opinion, this is FACT.