Nope, I will not be participating. While I am in favor of gay marriage, I find the tactics of left politicians against free speech and free enterprise to be revolting beyond description, and I would never associate myself with such drivel.
Disagreeing with CFA is very American, as is dissent in general, but attempting to ban them from your city for their beliefs is fascism.






















you speak of intolerance from others who don't agree with them, how does it feel seeing it the other way around?
The individual boycotts are probably permanent. I for one will never again set foot in a Chick-fil-A. Let's see if your new fast-food lovers can match that.
This has nothing to do with the Democratic party, the German Workers Party––whatever that is––or anything else you mention. We recognize Dave Cathy's right to think as we chooses, and we are sure he gives us the same consideration. He has decided to come out against gay rights, and we have decided to boycott his business.
Now he is experiencing a business boomlet as fellow bigots come out to support him, and we resolve to avoid patronizing his business for the rest of our lives. We will see who can hold out the longest.
The Monmouth University Polling Institute of New Jersey said it tested the four scenarios in anticipation of a national push that, according to estimates from the Federal Aviation Administration, could see up to 30,000 drones patrolling U.S. skies within a decade.
The FAA, under orders from Congress in a bill signed into law Feb. 14 by President Barack Obama, is expediting the expansion of domestic drone use.
And that’s OK with most Americans, the poll found.
“Americans clearly support using drone technology in special circumstances, but they are a bit leery of more routine use by local law enforcement agencies,” Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, said in a statement. –– NBC News
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_ne...
Yes, GE is a minority owner of NBC. So what?
What does any of this have to do with NBC's report on the drones? I believe that is called attacking the messenger when the message itself is unassailable.
I thought you were a reasonable person to debate with. I was wrong.
Dribble? Do you mean drivel?
NBC didn't make the call on MSNBC, Microsoft did,
Microsoft pulls out of MSNBC.com, sells stake to NBC
http://www.usatoday.com/money...
Microsoft Plans to Pull Out of MSNBC
http://mashable.com/2012/07/1...
The move, which was reported earlier by Adweek and The Daily Beat, among others, comes after unnamed NBC executives cited in the reports have complained about the dissonance between the left-leaning MSNBC TV network and the MSNBC website. The latter attempts a more middle-of-the-road approach and aggregates content from other news outlets
http://news.yahoo.com/microso...
This is beside the point. You brought it up as a red herring to distract from the report about the 30,000 drones, which are to be used primarily to patrol the border from above.
Whether Microsoft wants to be part of MSNBC is entirely irrelevant, since NBC News did the report, not MSNBC. They do have separate news staffs, you know.
Funny, I never told you my age, and I never asked for yours.
You know the law? When will you show it?